Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Functional significance of erythropoietin in renal cell carcinoma

  • Christudas Morais1Email author,
  • David W Johnson1, 2,
  • David A Vesey1, 2 and
  • Glenda C Gobe1
BMC Cancer201313:14

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-13-14

Received: 9 August 2012

Accepted: 18 December 2012

Published: 10 January 2013

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
9 Aug 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
20 Sep 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jose Najera
6 Nov 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Charles Rosser
4 Dec 2012 Author responded Author comments - Christudas Morais
Resubmission - Version 3
4 Dec 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
18 Dec 2012 Editorially accepted
10 Jan 2013 Article published 10.1186/1471-2407-13-14

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Centre for Kidney Disease Research, School of Medicine, University of Queensland at Princess Alexandra Hospital
(2)
Department of Renal Medicine, The University of Queensland at Princess Alexandra Hospital

Advertisement