Early versus deferred androgen suppression therapy for patients with lymph node-positive prostate cancer after local therapy with curative intent: a systematic review
© Kunath et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 1 June 2012
Accepted: 12 March 2013
Published: 19 March 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|1 Jun 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|27 Sep 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Philipp Dahm|
|27 Sep 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Steffen Krause|
|23 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Shiro Hinotsu|
|13 Dec 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Frank Kunath|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|13 Dec 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|12 Mar 2013||Editorially accepted|
|19 Mar 2013||Article published||10.1186/1471-2407-13-131|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.