Diagnostic value of endobronchial and endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for accessible lung cancer lesions after non-diagnostic conventional techniques: a prospective study
© Bugalho et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 5 February 2012
Accepted: 12 March 2013
Published: 19 March 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|5 Feb 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|3 Jun 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sebastien Gilbert|
|25 Jun 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Takahiro Nakajima|
|2 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Matthew Conron|
|3 Aug 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Antonio Bugalho|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|3 Aug 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|29 Sep 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Takahiro Nakajima|
|4 Dec 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Antonio Bugalho|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|4 Dec 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|12 Mar 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sebastien Gilbert|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|12 Mar 2013||Editorially accepted|
|19 Mar 2013||Article published||10.1186/1471-2407-13-130|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.