Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Prognostic role of CD133 expression in colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis

BMC Cancer201212:573

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-12-573

Received: 11 August 2012

Accepted: 27 November 2012

Published: 5 December 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
11 Aug 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
19 Aug 2012 Author responded Author comments - Junshu Zhang
Resubmission - Version 3
19 Aug 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
1 Oct 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Rosa Artells
5 Oct 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alex Sgambato
3 Nov 2012 Author responded Author comments - Junshu Zhang
Resubmission - Version 4
3 Nov 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
27 Nov 2012 Editorially accepted
5 Dec 2012 Article published 10.1186/1471-2407-12-573

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Cancer Institute (Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention & Intervention, National Ministry of Education; Provincial Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology in Medical Sciences), Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine
(2)
School of Finance, Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics
(3)
Department of Surgery, Linan People’s Hospital

Advertisement