Complement activation in astrocytomas: deposition of C4d and patient outcome
© Mäkelä et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 18 March 2012
Accepted: 28 November 2012
Published: 1 December 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|18 Mar 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|25 Mar 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Katri Mäkelä|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|25 Mar 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|15 May 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Craig Horbinski|
|20 Jun 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - S Ashraf Imam|
|26 Aug 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Katri Mäkelä|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|26 Aug 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|20 Sep 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Craig Horbinski|
|12 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - S Ashraf Imam|
|25 Nov 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Katri Mäkelä|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|25 Nov 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|28 Nov 2012||Editorially accepted|
|1 Dec 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-2407-12-565|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.