Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

A retrospective study investigating the rate of HER2 discordance between primary breast carcinoma and locoregional or metastatic disease

  • Arlene Chan1Email author,
  • Adrienne Morey2,
  • Belinda Brown2,
  • Diana Hastrich1,
  • Peter Willsher1 and
  • David Ingram1
BMC Cancer201212:555

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-12-555

Received: 19 June 2012

Accepted: 16 November 2012

Published: 24 November 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
19 Jun 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
24 Jul 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Michael Bilous
17 Aug 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lukas Bubendorf
2 Sep 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Tanja Fehm
16 Oct 2012 Author responded Author comments - Arlene Chan
Resubmission - Version 3
16 Oct 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
29 Oct 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lukas Bubendorf
3 Nov 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Tanja Fehm
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
16 Nov 2012 Editorially accepted
24 Nov 2012 Article published 10.1186/1471-2407-12-555

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Mount Hospital
(2)
Sydpath, St Vincent’s Hospital

Advertisement