Junction region of EWS-FLI1 fusion protein has a dominant negative effect in Ewing’s Sarcoma in vitro
- Babu Jully1,
- Ramshankar Vijayalakshmi†1,
- Gopisetty Gopal†1,
- Kesavan Sabitha1 and
- Thangarajan Rajkumar1Email author
© Jully et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 24 November 2011
Accepted: 30 October 2012
Published: 12 November 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|24 Nov 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|19 Mar 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Uta Dirksen|
|11 Apr 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Maria Cristina Manara|
|8 Aug 2012||Author responded||Author comments - THANGARAJAN RAJKUMAR|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|8 Aug 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|31 Aug 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Uta Dirksen|
|18 Sep 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Maria Cristina Manara|
|18 Oct 2012||Author responded||Author comments - THANGARAJAN RAJKUMAR|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|18 Oct 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|30 Oct 2012||Editorially accepted|
|12 Nov 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-2407-12-513|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.