Prognostic value of metabolic response in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy
- Maria D Cao†1, 8Email author,
- Guro F Giskeødegård†1,
- Tone F Bathen1, 2,
- Beathe Sitter1, 2,
- Anna Bofin3,
- Per E Lønning4, 5,
- Steinar Lundgren1, 6, 7 and
- Ingrid S Gribbestad1
© Cao et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 20 September 2011
Accepted: 25 January 2012
Published: 25 January 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|20 Sep 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|18 Nov 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kirstie Opstad|
|22 Nov 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Geoffrey Payne|
|25 Nov 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Mounia Beloueche-Babari|
|19 Dec 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Maria Dung Cao|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|19 Dec 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|4 Jan 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kirstie Opstad|
|11 Jan 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Mounia Beloueche-Babari|
|14 Jan 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Geoffrey Payne|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|25 Jan 2012||Editorially accepted|
|25 Jan 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-2407-12-39|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.