A nationwide study on reproductive function, ovarian reserve, and risk of premature menopause in female survivors of childhood cancer: design and methodological challenges
- Annelies Overbeek†1, 2, 13,
- Marleen H van den Berg†1Email author,
- Leontien CM Kremer3,
- Marry M van den Heuvel-Eibrink4,
- Wim JE Tissing5,
- Jacqueline J Loonen6,
- Birgitta Versluys7,
- Dorine Bresters8,
- Gertjan JL Kaspers1,
- Cornelis B Lambalk2,
- Flora E van Leeuwen9 and
- Eline van Dulmen-den Broeder1
© Overbeek et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 18 July 2012
Accepted: 16 August 2012
Published: 23 August 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|18 Jul 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|7 Aug 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Marleen van den Berg|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|7 Aug 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|16 Aug 2012||Editorially accepted|
|23 Aug 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-2407-12-363|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.