The role of versican G3 domain in regulating breast cancer cell motility including effects on osteoblast cell growth and differentiation in vitro– evaluation towards understanding breast cancer cell bone metastasis
© Du et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 24 April 2012
Accepted: 19 July 2012
Published: 3 August 2012
Versican is detected in the interstitial tissues at the invasive margins of breast carcinoma, is predictive of relapse, and negatively impacts overall survival rates. The versican G3 domain is important in breast cancer cell growth, migration and bone metastasis. However, mechanistic studies evaluating versican G3 enhanced breast cancer bone metastasis are limited.
A versican G3 construct was exogenously expressed in the 66c14 and the MC3T3-E1 cell line. Cells were observed through light microscopy and viability analyzed by Coulter Counter or determined with colorimetric proliferation assays. The Annexin V-FITC apoptosis detection kit was used to detect apoptotic activity. Modified Chemotactic Boyden chamber migration invasion assays were applied to observe tumor migration and invasion to bone stromal cells and MC3T3-E1 cells. Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) staining and ALP ELISA assays were performed to observe ALP activity in MC3T3-E1 cells.
In the four mouse breast cancer cell lines 67NR, 66c14, 4T07, and 4T1, 4T1 cells expressed higher levels of versican, and showed higher migration and invasion ability to MC3T3-E1 cells and primary bone stromal cells. 4T1 conditioned medium (CM) inhibited MC3T3-E1 cell growth, and even lead to apoptosis. Only 4T1 CM prevented MC3T3-E1 cell differentiation, noted by inhibition of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity. We exogenously expressed a versican G3 construct in a cell line that expresses low versican levels (66c14), and observed that the G3-expressing 66c14 cells showed enhanced cell migration and invasion to bone stromal and MC3T3-E1 cells. This observation was prevented by selective EGFR inhibitor AG1478, selective MEK inhibitor PD 98059, and selective AKT inhibitor Triciribine, but not by selective JNK inhibitor SP 600125. Versican G3 enhanced breast cancer cell invasion to bone stromal cells or osteoblast cells appears to occur through enhancing EGFR/ERK or AKT signaling. G3 expressing MC3T3-E1 cells showed inhibited cell growth and cell differentiation when cultured with TGF-β1 (1 ng/ml), and expressed enhanced cell apoptosis when cultured with TNF-α (2 ng/ml). Enhanced EGFR/JNK signaling appears to be responsible for G3 enhanced osteoblast apoptosis and inhibited osteoblast differentiation. Whereas repressed expression of GSK-3β (S9P) contributes to G3 inhibited osteoblast growth. Versican G3 functionality was dependent on its EGF-like motifs. Without the structure of EGF-like repeats, the G3 domain would not confer enhancement of tumor cell migration and invasion to bone with concordant inhibition of osteoblast differentiation and promotion of osteoblast apoptosis.
Versican enhances breast cancer bone metastasis not only through enhancing tumor cell mobility, invasion, and survival in bone tissues, but also by inhibiting pre-osteoblast cell growth, differentiation, which supply favorable microenvironments for tumor metastasis.
KeywordsMetastasis Cell differentiation Apoptosis Invasion Versican G3 domain
The predilection for breast cancer to metastasize to bone has been recognized for more than 50 years. However, the underlying mechanisms which regulate the haptotactic migration of breast cancer cells to bone have not been firmly established. Metastasis to bone occurs frequently in most advanced breast cancers, accompanied by complications in the form of skeletal related events (such as bone fracture), dramatically reducing the patient’s quality of life . As with many other metastatic cancers, breast cancer cells must take a series of steps to metastasize to bone. These include detaching from the primary tumor, invading the surrounding tumor stroma, intra-vasating into local blood vessels, surviving in the bloodstream, and colonizing the bony tissues, thereby forming metastatic tumors [2, 3]. The intrinsic metastatic propensity of breast cancer cells, such as loss of cell polarity, reduction of cell-cell and cell-matrix adhesion, which support detachment, migration and invasion of tumor cells, is a major determinant of metastatic efficiency . The importance of the bone microenvironment in determining tumor cell colonization and growth is also broadly accepted, commonly named the “seed and soil” theory [4–6]. Specific aspects of both breast cancer cells and the bone microenvironment are likely important contributors to the development of bone metastasis [5, 6].
Tumor cell-autonomous changes alone are not sufficient to allow tumor progression and metastasis to occur . It is well known that the supportive “stroma” around the solid tumor, consisting of specific extracellular matrix (ECM) components, plays an important role in activating the tumor microenvironment at the primary and second tumor sites [5, 8]. The interaction between tumor cells and the ECM, which is mediated by cell-cell contact, growth factor signaling and paracrine cytokine activity facilitates tumor cell outgrowth, invasion and metastasis [4, 9].
Versican is a member of the large aggregating chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans and belongs to the lectican family. To date, four isoforms of versican (V0, V1, V2 and V3) have been identified in various tissues. Structurally all versican isoforms include an N-terminal G1 domain, a glycosamingoglycan (GAG) attachment region, and a C-terminus containing a selectin-like (G3) domain. With exception is the V3 isoform, which has no GAG region . The G3 domain contains two epidermal growth factor (EGF)-like repeats, a lectin-like motif (carbohydrate recognition domain), and a complement binding protein (CBP)-motif. Given their ubiquitousness and high degree of conservation, it is likely that the G1 and G3 domains play a vital role in proteoglycan function . There is an increasing recognition of the importance of the G3 domain to tumor growth, motility, and metastasis [12–15].
Versican is detected in the interstitial tissues at the invasive margins of breast carcinoma and in the elastic tissues associated with tumor invasion . Immunolocalization of versican in breast tumors, including infiltrating ductal carcinoma, has been reported . The high expression of versican in human breast tumor appears prognostic, is predictive of relapse, and negatively impacts overall survival rates [17, 18]. Direct evidence of versican functions have been obtained by ectopic expression of full-length versican [19–21]. Previous studies shows that the activity of the versican G3 domain is important in breast cancer cell growth, migration and metastasis . Versican G3 domain enhanced breast cancer progression, metastasis, chemical reagent (i.e. chemotherapy) resistance, and tumor cell self-renewal is modulated by the up-regulation of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR)-mediated signaling [22–24].
In our previous work we characterized the expression of versican in murine mammary epithelial tumor cell lines 67NR, 66c14, 4T07, and 4T1 (which were derived from a single spontaneous arising mammary tumor from Balb/cfC3H mice) [25, 26]. Versican was highly expressed in the 4T1 cell line which is one of the very few cell lines of any origin that spontaneously metastasize to bone. This closely mimicks Stage IV human breast cancer which hematogeneously metastasizes to the lung, liver, bone, and brain . Most interestingly, exogenous expression of the versican G3 fragment in a mammary carcinoma 66 cl4 cell line (a cell line that expresses low levels of versican and normally metastasizes to the lung but not the bone) was sufficient not only to promote local tumor growth but also to enhance metastasis to bone from the mammary fat pad . In order to investigate the potential mechanisms through which versican expression promoted breast cancer cell bone metastasis, we exogeneously expressed a versican G3 domain in mouse breast cancer cell line 66c14 and mouse pre-osteoblast-like cell line MC3T3-E1. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of the versican G3 domain on breast cancer cell invasion and migration to primary bone stromal and pre-osteoblast MC3T3-E1 cells. The effects of G3 on bone stromal and pre-osteoblast cell growth, differentiation, and apoptosis would also be evaluated.
The polyclonal antibody against pEGFR was obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. The polyclonal antibodies against pSAPK/JNK and pAKT were obtained from Cell Signaling. The polyclonal antibodies against versican V1 isoform, Glycogen synthase kinase-3 β serine-9 phosphorylation (GSK-3β, S9P), were obtained from Abcam. EGF, selective EGFR inhibitor AG 1478, selective MEK inhibitor PD 98059, selective pSAPK/JNK inhibitor SP 600125, the monoclonal antibody against β-actin, and the Alkaline phosphatase kits used in the study were obtained from Sigma. Selective AKT inhibitor Triciribine was from Calbiochem. Horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG and horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG were obtained from Bio-Rad. Immunoblotting was performed using the ECL Western blot detection kit. Cell Proliferation Reagent WST-1 was obtained from Roche Applied Science.
The pre-osteoblast-like cell line - MC3T3-E1 was cultured in alpha modified Eagle’s medium (AMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum, penicillin (100 U/ml) and streptomycin (100 μg/ml) and maintained at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2. Mouse mammary tumor cell lines 67NR, 66c14, 4T07, 4T1 were cultured in DMEM media, which were supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum, penicillin (100 U/ml) and streptomycin (100 μg/ml) and maintained at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2. In selected experiments, cell suspensions were cultured with EGF (20 ng/ml), EGFR inhibitor AG 1478 (2 μM), selective MEK inhibitor PD 98059 (50 μM), selective SAPK/JNK inhibitor SP 600125 (100 nM), and selective AKT inhibitor Triciribine (2 μM).
Exogenous expression of versican G3 construct in MC3T3-E1 and 66 C14 cell lines
The pcDNA1 - G3 construct and pcDNA1 - G3 fragment lacking the EGF-like motifs (G3ΔEGF) construct were generated by our group . The mouse pre-osteoblast-like cell line MC3T3-E1 and mouse mammary tumor cell line 66c14, were transfected with pcDNA1-vector, G3 construct, and G3ΔEGF construct, or the control vector. Three days after transfection, Geneticin was added to the growth medium at a concentration of 1 mg/ml, and the cells were maintained in this medium until individual colonies were large enough for cloning. Chemically selected stable cell lines were maintained in culture medium containing 0.5 mg/ml Geneticin or stored in liquid nitrogen.
Cell proliferation assays
Versican G3- and ×vector-transfected MC3T3-E1 cells (2 × 104 cells) were seeded onto 6-well dishes in 10% FBS/AMEM medium and maintained at 37°C overnight. Cells were harvested daily and cell number was counted under light microscope. Cell proliferation assays were also performed with a colorimetric proliferation assay (Cell Proliferation Reagent WST-1). Versican G3 and control vector transfected MC3T3-E1 (2 × 103 cells/well) cells were cultured in 100 μl FBS/AMEM medium in 96 wells tissue culture microplates. The absorbance of the samples against a background blank control was measured daily for 5 days by a microplate (ELISA) reader. In selected experiments, cell suspensions were cultured with TGF-β (1 ng/ml), selective SAPK/JNK inhibitor SP 600125 (100 nM).
Cell viability assays
G3 and vector-transfected MC3T3-E1 (2 × 105) were cultured in 10% FBS/DMEM medium in culture dishes and maintained at 37°C for 12 hours. After cell attachment, we changed the medium to serum free DMEM medium or 10% FBS/DMEM medium containing 2 ng/ml TNF-α. Cells were harvested daily and cell number was analyzed by Coulter Counter. Cell survival assays were also performed with colorimetric proliferation assays (Cell Proliferation Reagent WST-1). Versican G3 and control vector transfected MC3T3-E1 (1 × 104 cells/well) were inoculated and cultured in 10% FBS/DMEM medium in 96 well culture dishes for 12 hours. After cell attachment, we changed the medium into serum free DMEM medium or 10% FBS/DMEM medium containing 2 ng/ml TNF-α for 4 days and then cultured cells with 10 μl WST-1 reagents for 4 hours. The absorbance of the samples against a background blank control was measured by a microplate reader.
Annexin V assays
An Annexin V-FITC apoptosis detection kit (Biovision Inc, Mountain View, CA, USA) was used to detect apoptotic activity. Cells (1 × 106) were collected and resuspended in binding buffer. Annexin V-FITC and propidium iodide were added to each sample and incubated in the dark for 5 minutes. Annexin V-FITC binding was determined by flow cytometry (Ex = 488 nm; Em = 530 nm) using FITC signal detector (FL1) and propidium staining by the phycoerythrin emission signal detector (FL2).
Cell migration assays
Modified chemotactic Boyden chamber migration assays: This assay was performed using 24-well cell culture plates and a 3 μm cell culture insert. The tibias and femora were harvested from Balb/c mice, crushed and digested with a solution of DMEM containing collagenase type II (6 mg/ml) and dispase II (8 mg/ml) for 60 minutes. The cell suspension was filtered through a 70 μm nylon filter and washed three times by centrifugation in DMEM. The cell pellet was resuspended in DMEM, 10% FBS and maintained at 37°C overnight. After 12–16 h of culture, these cells were allowed to form a confluent monolayer in the bottom well of Transwell migration chambers (5 × 104). The medium was removed and washed with PBS, followed by culturing in 600 μl 10% DMEM with or without 2.0 μM AG 1478, 50 μM PD 98059 at 37°C for an additional incubation time of 2 hours. 1 × 105 cells were gently injected into each filter insert (upper chamber) and then incubated at 37°C for 4 h. The filter inserts were removed from the chambers, fixed with methanol for 5 minutes, and stained with Harris’ Haemotoxylin for 20 minutes. Migrating cells were stained blue. Migration experiments were performed in triplicate and were counted in three fields of views/membrane.
The cell migration assay was also performed with MC3T3-E1 cells (5 × 104) loaded in the bottom well of the Transwell migration chambers.
Cell invasion assays
Modified chemotactic Boyden chamber invasion assays: This assay was performed using 24-well cell culture plates and an 8 μm cell culture insert. After culturing the bone stromal cells or MC3T3-E1 cells (5 × 104) in the bottom well of Transwell migration chambers for 12 h, the medium was removed and the cultures were washed with PBS, followed by 100 μl diluted matrigel (1 mg/ml) filling in the upper chamber and 600 μl of 10% FBS/DMEM medium in lower chamber with the Transwell subsequently incubated at 37°C for 4 h. Cells (1 × 105) in 100 μl serum free DMEM medium with were gently injected into each filter insert (upper chamber) and then incubated at 37°C for 24 – 72 h. The filter inserts were removed from the chambers, fixed with methanol for 5 minutes, and stained with Harris’ Haemotoxylin for 20 minutes. Samples were subsequently washed, dried, and mounted onto slides for analysis using a light microscope. The invasive cells were stained blue and were counted in 6 fields of views/membrane.
Alkaline phosphatase staining
The MC3T3-E1 cells were seeded at a density of 8 × 104 cells/well on 6 well plates. Cells were maintained in 10% FBS/AMEM medium for 21 days. The medium was changed every 3 days. Before staining, the cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min at room temperature. After washing with PBS, the cells were incubated with a mixture of Naphthol AS-MX phosphate solution and diluted diazonium salt solution for 30 min. After washing, the plates were incubated in Mayer’s Hematoxylin solution for 10 min. The staining was evaluated under microscope.
Alkaline phosphatase ELISA assay
Cells were treated with 0.2% Triton X-100 and harvested. Lysates were centrifuged and supernatants (10 μg protein) were incubated with 150 μl pNPP for 5 hours at room temperature in the dark. Absorbance at 405 nm was measured using a microplate reader, and ALP activity was calculated according to manufacturer’s instructions (Sigma Aldrich).
Western blot analysis
Protein samples were subjected to sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) on separating gel containing 7–10% acrylamide. Separated proteins were transblotted onto a nitrocellulose membrane in 1 × Tris/glycine buffer containing 20% methanol at 60 V for 2 hours in a cold room. The membrane was blocked in TBST (10 mM Tris-Cl, pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 0.05% Tween 20) containing 5% non-fat dry milk powder (TBSTM) for 1 hour at room temperature, and then incubated with primary antibodies at 4°C overnight. The membranes were washed with TBST (3 × 30 minutes) and then incubated with appropriate horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies in TBSTM for 1 hour. After washing as above, the bound antibodies were visualized with an ECL detection kit.
Results and discussion
Effects of conditioned medium of mouse mammary tumor cells on MC3T3-E1 cell growth and differentiation
Breast cancer frequently metastasizes to bone, resulting in osteolytic lesions. These lesions, formed by increased osteoclastic activity and reduced osteoblastic activity, are reflected by decreases in both osteoid volume and osteoblastic surface [29, 30]. It has been known that breast cancer cells communicate with osteoblasts and subsequently activate osteoclast activity. It has also been reported that breast cancer cells can induce apoptosis of osteoblast cells and bone marrow stromal cells [31, 32]. Breast cancer cells also inhibit osteoblast cell differentiation in vitro. Conditioned medium (CM) of human breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-231 showed inhibitive effects on MC3T3-E1 mouse pre-osteoblast cell differentiation. TGF-β in the medium was identified as the main factor that caused the inhibition of MC3T3-E1 differentiation, motivating further evaluation in the present study .
Increased expression of the versican V0 and V1 isoforms have been reported in breast cancer and other malignant tumors, generally conferring poor prognosis [34, 35]. The four mouse mammary tumor cell lines 67NR, 66c14, 4T07, and 4T1 were derived from a single spontaneous arising mammary tumor from Balb/cfC3H mice, whose tumorigenic and metastatic potential has been characterized [25–27]. Although they share a common origin, these cell lines are phenotypically heterogeneous in their metastatic behavior. The 4T1 cell line is one of the very few cell lines of any origin that spontaneously metastasizes to bone. This closely mimics Stage IV human breast cancer, which hematogeneously metastasizes to the lung, liver, bone, and brain. 66c14 cells appear to metastasize to the lung and liver via the lymphatic system . 67NR cells fail to leave the primary site, while 4T07 cells are highly tumorigenic locally but fail to metastasize . Cancer cell invasiveness towards bone stroma and the inhibitory effects observed in both pre-osteoblast cell growth and differentiation appear influenced by versican. Our in vitro study complements this understanding. Greater versican expression in 4T1 cells compared to other breast cancer cell lines may be associated with the predilection towards bone metastasis.
Expression of versican G3 domain enhanced breast cancer cell migration and invasion
Versican interacts with its binding partners through its N- and C-terminal globular regions as well as its central GAG-binding region . It is known to associate with a number of molecules in the extracellular matrix (ECM) including hyaluronan  fibronectin , P- and L-selectin, and various chemokines . Versican also binds to the cell surface proteins epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) , P-selectin , CD44  and integrin β1 . Increasingly, experimental evidence and clinical data support the understanding that versican participates in cell adhesion, proliferation, migration, and angiogenesis. It plays a central role in normal tissue morphogenesis and maintenance, while contributing to the process of tumorigenesis [11, 41]. Versican G3 enhances local breast cancer progression, systemic metastases, and influences chemotherapy effects on cancer cells. Cell stromal interactions involve VEGF and fibronectin . We have also previously demonstrated the importance of EGF-like motifs to G3 functionality. However, the mechanisms by which G3 influence bone activity is poorly understood and results of the present study bridges that knowledge gap [22–24].
Expression of versican G3 domain regulated MC3T3-E1 cell differentiation, growth and apoptosis
Although tumors are typically defined by their uncontrolled and invasive growth, some are supported by the surrounding stroma when metastasizing to distant organs. Tumor phenotype considers both local and systemic immune factors [42, 43]. Specific cytokines and growth factors, such as transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), have been implicated in influencing tumor-stromal connectivity both locally and from a systemic perspective [42, 43].
In breast cancer, TGF-β signaling has been shown to reduce growth of the primary tumor but also to promote metastasis, indicating that the apparent effect of TGF-β depends on its cellular context . It was reported to have a dual role in breast cancer progression. During the early stages of tumorigenesis, TGF-β inhibits tumor growth, but in advanced cancer it loses its growth inhibitive function, and continues to stimulate tumor cell metastasis . Elevated plasma TGF-β was reported in advanced breast cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, lung and prostate cancer patients and correlated with poor outcome . Systemic TGFβ1 levels have been used as a surrogate of tumor load and/or response to therapy . TGF-β is also abundant in bone matrix. It is released from bone matrix and is activated by osteoclastic re-absorption. TGF-β stimulates breast cancer cell to secrete other growth factors including Parathyroid Hormone related protein, contributing to breast cancer bone metastasis .
Versican G3 domain promotes cell proliferation in breast cancer and many other carcinoma cells in vitro and in vivo. G3-expressing breast cancer cells showed drug resistance to Doxorubicin and Epirubicin, but expressed enhanced apoptosis when cultured in C2-ceramide and Docetaxel [23, 24]. Versican and its G3 domain inhibited mesenchymal chondrogensis through mechanisms involving its EGF-like motifs . The present research shows that G3 inhibits osteoblast cell growth and differentiation in TGF-β1 conditioned medium and promotes cell apoptosis induced by TGF-α. Versican is highly expressed in advanced breast cancer patients, as is TGF-β and TGF-α, indicating that the interaction of these molecules may facilitate tumor cell haptotactic migration towards bony tissues.
Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) is a pleiotropic cytokine that plays an important role in immunity and inflammation as well as in the control of cell proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis . TNF-α is produced mainly by macrophages and enhances tumor regression mediated by cytotoxic T cells. TNF-α has been implicated to play a role in advanced breast cancer and some other metastatic tumors. It induces tumor necrosis by initiating apoptotic cell or death affecting tumor vascularization . Paradoxically however, it can also promote tumor cell proliferation and progression [50, 51].
Versican G3 domain modulated MC3T3-E1 cell differentiation, growth and apoptosis through epidermal growth factor-like motifs
In our experiments, we also stably transfected MC3T3-E1 cells with a G3 construct, G3ΔEGF, and vector. We found that G3ΔEGF-expressing MC3T3-E1 cells did not show enhanced cell growth inhibition induced by TGF-β1 when compared to the G3 transfected cell group (Figure 6b, 6c). The EGF like motifs of G3 domain did not appear to be one of the main participants in the TGF-β-induced growth inhibition of MC3T3E1 cells. However the EGF repeats were demonstrated to play an important role in TGF-β-induced inhibition of cell differentiation. G3ΔEGF-expressing MC3T3-E1 cells did show enhanced cell differentiation in TGF-β1 medium when compared with the G3 transfected cell group in 21 days (Figure 6c). Immunoblotting experiments showed that G3ΔEGF expressing cells did not show enhanced pEGFR and pSAPK/JNK as compared to G3 transfected cells but did express decreased levels of GSK-3β (S9P), as G3 transfected cells did in TGF-β CM (Figure 6d). G3ΔEGF-expressing MC3T3-E1 cells did not show enhanced cell growth apoptosis induced by TNF-α when compared to the G3 transfected cell group (Figure 6e). Immunoblotting showed that G3ΔEGF expressing cells did not show enhanced pEGFR and pSAPK/JNK expression as G3 transfected cells did in serum free AMEM medium containing TNF-α (Figure 6f).
In summary, dependency on EGF-like motifs in versican G3 was observed in G3’s ability to enhance inhibition of MC3T3-E1 cell differentiation induced by TGF-β and cell apoptosis induced by TNF-α. Without the structure of its EGF-like repeats, G3 domain lost its function in activating the EGFR/JNK signaling pathway, and thus did not confer its previously observed ability to inhibit MC3T3-E1 cell differentiation and promote MC3T3-E1 cell apoptosis.
The potential mechanisms by which versican enhances breast cancer cell metastasis to bone
Specific aspects of breast cancer cells, tumor stroma, and the bone microenvironment contribute to the development of bone metastasis. Breast cancer preferentially spreads to bone . Tumor cells can produce or stimulate tumor stromal cells to secrete a variety of cytokines, ECM components (such as versican), and other bioactive factors that act on cells in the tumor, stroma and bone. Given an appropriate environment, tumor cells become more invasive, stromal tissues support tumor outgrowth, and metastasis occurs. The bone microenvironment favors tumor cell colonization for cancers such as breast, prostate, lung, renal, and colon . Breast cancer metastasis is historically bone destructive and osteolytic in nature, although recent systemic advances in therapy including bisphosphonates that potently inhibit osteoclastic activity has resulted in more mixed osteolytic/osteoblastic disease. Thus, the specific molecular interactions between the breast cancer cells, stromal tissues and the bone microenvironment drive the development of bone metastasis. A mechanistic understanding of the molecular factors associated with poor prognosis is important in developing new therapies and molecular targets .
Local and systemic immune modulators influence the tumor phenotype [42, 43]. Several cytokines and growth factors participate in tumor-stroma connectivity, in particular transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α). These factors are initially stimulated by the immune system in response to tumor cells, playing an important role in both immunity and inflammation. These factors have also been shown to regulate tumor/stromal cell proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis . During the early stages of tumorigenesis, TGF-β inhibits tumor growth, and TNF-α induces tumor necrosis by initiating apoptotic cell or death affecting tumor vascularization. Paradoxically however, they can also promote tumor cell proliferation, progression and metastasis in advanced breast cancer . Thus, both TNF-α and TGF-β display a dual role in breast cancer tumorigenesis – both as tumor promoters and as tumor suppressors .
In summary, the results of this in-vitro study demonstrate that versican enhances tumor cell mobility, invasion, and survival in bone tissues. It also acts as an inhibitor of bone stromal and pre-osteoblast MC3T3-E1 cell growth. This may explain in part, why the bone acts as a favorable microenvironment for breast cancer cell metastasis. Versican and its related G3 domain with its EGF-like motifs influence downstream EGFR and AKT signaling, influencing bone stromal and pre-osteoblast cells. It also appears to modulate TGF-β-1 and TNF-α bone related activity.
The authors wish to thank Ms. Gisele Knowles (Cytometry and Microscopy Core Facility of Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre) for her assistance with the cell apoptosis assays, and Miss Sarah Davies (Division of Orthopaedics, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre) for her assistance with the manuscript. This work was supported by a grant from CIHR China-Canada Joint Health Research Initiative Grant (CCI 102929) to BBY and YZ. Support for this study to AJY was also provided from the Holland Musculoskeletal Program, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre. This work was supported by a grant from National Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (227937–12) to BBY who is the recipient of a Career Investigator Award (CI 7418) from the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario.
- Felding-Habermann B, O’Toole TE, Smith JW, Fransvea E, Ruggeri ZM, Ginsberg MH, Hughes PE, Pampori N, Shattil SJ, Saven A, et al: Integrin activation controls metastasis in human breast cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001, 98 (4): 1853-1858. 10.1073/pnas.98.4.1853.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Couzin J: Medicine. Tracing the steps of metastasis, cancer’s menacing ballet. Science. 2003, 299 (5609): 1002-1006. 10.1126/science.299.5609.1002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Valentiner U, Brooks SA, Schumacher U: In vivo xenograft models of breast cancer metastasis. Methods Mol Med. 2006, 120: 479-488.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fidler IJ: The pathogenesis of cancer metastasis: the ’seed and soil’ hypothesis revisited. Nat Rev Cancer. 2003, 3 (6): 453-458. 10.1038/nrc1098.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fidler IJ: Seed and soil revisited: contribution of the organ microenvironment to cancer metastasis. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2001, 10 (2): 257-269. vii-viiiiPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mendoza M, Khanna C: Revisiting the seed and soil in cancer metastasis. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2009, 41 (7): 1452-1462. 10.1016/j.biocel.2009.01.015.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yoneda T, Hiraga T: Crosstalk between cancer cells and bone microenvironment in bone metastasis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005, 328 (3): 679-687. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.11.070.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Siclari VA, Guise TA, Chirgwin JM: Molecular interactions between breast cancer cells and the bone microenvironment drive skeletal metastases. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2006, 25 (4): 621-633.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Guise TA, Mohammad KS, Clines G, Stebbins EG, Wong DH, Higgins LS, Vessella R, Corey E, Padalecki S, Suva L, et al: Basic mechanisms responsible for osteolytic and osteoblastic bone metastases. Clin Cancer Res. 2006, 12 (20 Pt 2): 6213s-6216s.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yamaguchi Y: Lecticans: organizers of the brain extracellular matrix. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2000, 57 (2): 276-289. 10.1007/PL00000690.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Theocharis AD: Versican in health and disease. Connect Tissue Res. 2008, 49 (3): 230-234. 10.1080/03008200802147571.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yee AJ, Akens M, Yang BL, Finkelstein J, Zheng PS, Deng Z, Yang B: The effect of versican G3 domain on local breast cancer invasiveness and bony metastasis. Breast Cancer Res. 2007, 9 (4): R47-10.1186/bcr1751.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Wu Y, Chen L, Cao L, Sheng W, Yang BB: Overexpression of the C-terminal PG-M/versican domain impairs growth of tumor cells by intervening in the interaction between epidermal growth factor receptor and beta1-integrin. J Cell Sci. 2004, 117 (Pt 11): 2227-2237.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zheng PS, Vais D, Lapierre D, Liang YY, Lee V, Yang BL, Yang BB: PG-M/versican binds to P-selectin glycoprotein ligand-1 and mediates leukocyte aggregation. J Cell Sci. 2004, 117 (Pt 24): 5887-5895.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Xiang YY, Dong H, Wan Y, Li J, Yee A, Yang BB, Lu WY: Versican G3 domain regulates neurite growth and synaptic transmission of hippocampal neurons by activation of epidermal growth factor receptor. J Biol Chem. 2006, 281 (28): 19358-19368. 10.1074/jbc.M512980200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nara Y, Kato Y, Torii Y, Tsuji Y, Nakagaki S, Goto S, Isobe H, Nakashima N, Takeuchi J: Immunohistochemical localization of extracellular matrix components in human breast tumours with special reference to PG-M/versican. Histochem J. 1997, 29 (1): 21-30. 10.1023/A:1026460700592.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ricciardelli C, Brooks JH, Suwiwat S, Sakko AJ, Mayne K, Raymond WA, Seshadri R, LeBaron RG, Horsfall DJ: Regulation of stromal versican expression by breast cancer cells and importance to relapse-free survival in patients with node-negative primary breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2002, 8 (4): 1054-1060.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Suwiwat S, Ricciardelli C, Tammi R, Tammi M, Auvinen P, Kosma VM, LeBaron RG, Raymond WA, Tilley WD, Horsfall DJ: Expression of extracellular matrix components versican, chondroitin sulfate, tenascin, and hyaluronan, and their association with disease outcome in node-negative breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2004, 10 (7): 2491-2498. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-03-0146.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- LaPierre DP, Lee DY, Li SZ, Xie YZ, Zhong L, Sheng W, Deng Z, Yang BB: The ability of versican to simultaneously cause apoptotic resistance and sensitivity. Cancer Res. 2007, 67 (10): 4742-4750. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-3610.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sheng W, Wang G, La Pierre DP, Wen J, Deng Z, Wong CK, Lee DY, Yang BB: Versican mediates mesenchymal-epithelial transition. Mol Biol Cell. 2006, 17 (4): 2009-2020. 10.1091/mbc.E05-10-0951.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Sheng W, Wang G, Wang Y, Liang J, Wen J, Zheng PS, Wu Y, Lee V, Slingerland J, Dumont D, et al: The roles of versican V1 and V2 isoforms in cell proliferation and apoptosis. Mol Biol Cell. 2005, 16 (3): 1330-1340. 10.1091/mbc.E04-04-0295.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Du WW, Yang BB, Shatseva TA, Yang BL, Deng Z, Shan SW, Lee DY, Seth A, Yee AJ: Versican G3 promotes mouse mammary tumor cell growth, migration, and metastasis by influencing EGF receptor signaling. PLoS One. 2010, 5 (11): e13828-10.1371/journal.pone.0013828.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Du WW, Yang BB, Yang BL, Deng Z, Fang L, Shan SW, Jeyapalan Z, Zhang Y, Seth A, Yee AJ: Versican G3 Domain Modulates Breast Cancer Cell Apoptosis: a Mechanism for Breast Cancer Cell Response to Chemotherapy and EGFR Therapy. PLoS One. 6 (11): e26396-Google Scholar
- Du WW, Seth A, Yang BB, Yee AJ: The role of versican in modulating breast cancer cell self-renewal.The 65 Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society, 2012 Feb 4-7. 2012, San Franciso, California, 182-Google Scholar
- Lelekakis M, Moseley JM, Martin TJ, Hards D, Williams E, Ho P, Lowen D, Javni J, Miller FR, Slavin J, et al: A novel orthotopic model of breast cancer metastasis to bone. Clin Exp Metastasis. 1999, 17 (2): 163-170. 10.1023/A:1006689719505.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tao K, Li J, Warner J, MacLeod K, Miller FR, Sahagian GG: Multiple lysosomal trafficking phenotypes in metastatic mouse mammary tumor cell lines. Int J Oncol. 2001, 19 (6): 1333-1339.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mi Z, Guo H, Wai PY, Gao C, Kuo PC: Integrin-linked kinase regulates osteopontin-dependent MMP-2 and uPA expression to convey metastatic function in murine mammary epithelial cancer cells. Carcinogenesis. 2006, 27 (6): 1134-1145. 10.1093/carcin/bgi352.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhang Y, Wu Y, Cao L, Lee V, Chen L, Lin Z, Kiani C, Adams ME, Yang BB: Versican modulates embryonic chondrocyte morphology via the epidermal growth factor-like motifs in G3. Exp Cell Res. 2001, 263 (1): 33-42. 10.1006/excr.2000.5095.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cicek M, Oursler MJ: Breast cancer bone metastasis and current small therapeutics. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2006, 25 (4): 635-644.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zheng Y, Zhou H, Fong-Yee C, Modzelewski JR, Seibel MJ, Dunstan CR: Bone resorption increases tumour growth in a mouse model of osteosclerotic breast cancer metastasis. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2008, 25 (5): 559-567. 10.1007/s10585-008-9172-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mastro AM, Gay CV, Welch DR, Donahue HJ, Jewell J, Mercer R, DiGirolamo D, Chislock EM, Guttridge K: Breast cancer cells induce osteoblast apoptosis: a possible contributor to bone degradation. J Cell Biochem. 2004, 91 (2): 265-276. 10.1002/jcb.10746.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fromigue O, Kheddoumi N, Lomri A, Marie PJ, Body JJ: Breast cancer cells release factors that induced apoptosis in human bone marrow stromal cells. J Bone Miner Res. 2001, 16 (9): 1600-1610. 10.1359/jbmr.2001.16.9.1600.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mercer RR, Miyasaka C, Mastro AM: Metastatic breast cancer cells suppress osteoblast adhesion and differentiation. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2004, 21 (5): 427-435. 10.1007/s10585-004-1867-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gorter A, Zijlmans HJ, van Gent H, Trimbos JB, Fleuren GJ, Jordanova ES: Versican expression is associated with tumor-infiltrating CD8-positive T cells and infiltration depth in cervical cancer. Mod Pathol. 2010, 23 (12)): 1605-1615.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kischel P, Waltregny D, Dumont B, Turtoi A, Greffe Y, Kirsch S, De Pauw E, Castronovo V: Versican overexpression in human breast cancer lesions: known and new isoforms for stromal tumor targeting. Int J Cancer. 2010, 126 (3): 640-650. 10.1002/ijc.24812.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wu YJ, La Pierre DP, Wu J, Yee AJ, Yang BB: The interaction of versican with its binding partners. Cell Res. 2005, 15 (7): 483-494. 10.1038/sj.cr.7290318.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- LeBaron RG, Zimmermann DR, Ruoslahti E: Hyaluronate binding properties of versican. J Biol Chem. 1992, 267 (14): 10003-10010.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yamagata M, Yamada KM, Yoneda M, Suzuki S, Kimata K: Chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan (PG-M-like proteoglycan) is involved in the binding of hyaluronic acid to cellular fibronectin. J Biol Chem. 1986, 261 (29): 13526-13535.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kawashima H, Hirose M, Hirose J, Nagakubo D, Plaas AH, Miyasaka M: Binding of a large chondroitin sulfate/dermatan sulfate proteoglycan, versican, to L-selectin, P-selectin, and CD44. J Biol Chem. 2000, 275 (45): 35448-35456. 10.1074/jbc.M003387200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wu Y, Chen L, Zheng PS, Yang BB: beta 1-Integrin-mediated glioma cell adhesion and free radical-induced apoptosis are regulated by binding to a C-terminal domain of PG-M/versican. J Biol Chem. 2002, 277 (14): 12294-12301. 10.1074/jbc.M110748200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rahmani M, Wong BW, Ang L, Cheung CC, Carthy JM, Walinski H, McManus BM: Versican: signaling to transcriptional control pathways. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 2006, 84 (1): 77-92. 10.1139/y05-154.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Faccio R: Immune regulation of the tumor/bone vicious cycle. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2011, 1237 (1): 71-78. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06244.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Patel SA, Dave MA, Murthy RG, Helmy KY, Rameshwar P: Metastatic breast cancer cells in the bone marrow microenvironment: novel insights into oncoprotection. Oncol Rev. 2011, 5 (2): 93-102. 10.1007/s12156-010-0071-y.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Teicher BA: Malignant cells, directors of the malignant process: role of transforming growth factor-beta. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2001, 20 (1–2): 133-143.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ruppender NS, Merkel AR, Martin TJ, Mundy GR, Sterling JA, Guelcher SA: Matrix rigidity induces osteolytic gene expression of metastatic breast cancer cells. PLoS One. 2010, 5 (11): e15451-10.1371/journal.pone.0015451.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Kong FM, Anscher MS, Murase T, Abbott BD, Iglehart JD, Jirtle RL: Elevated plasma transforming growth factor-beta 1 levels in breast cancer patients decrease after surgical removal of the tumor. Ann Surg. 1995, 222 (2): 155-162. 10.1097/00000658-199508000-00007.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Drabsch Y, ten Dijke P: TGF-beta signaling in breast cancer cell invasion and bone metastasis. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia. 2011, 16 (2): 97-108. 10.1007/s10911-011-9217-1.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Zhang Y, Cao L, Kiani CG, Yang BL, Yang BB: The G3 domain of versican inhibits mesenchymal chondrogenesis via the epidermal growth factor-like motifs. J Biol Chem. 1998, 273 (49): 33054-33063. 10.1074/jbc.273.49.33054.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tumber A, Morgan HM, Meikle MC, Hill PA: Human breast-cancer cells stimulate the fusion, migration and resorptive activity of osteoclasts in bone explants. Int J Cancer. 2001, 91 (5): 665-672. 10.1002/1097-0215(200002)9999:9999<::AID-IJC1100>3.0.CO;2-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Idriss HT, Naismith JH: TNF alpha and the TNF receptor superfamily: structure-function relationship(s). Microsc Res Tech. 2000, 50 (3): 184-195. 10.1002/1097-0029(20000801)50:3<184::AID-JEMT2>3.0.CO;2-H.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Szlosarek PW, Balkwill FR: Tumour necrosis factor alpha: a potential target for the therapy of solid tumours. Lancet Oncol. 2003, 4 (9): 565-573. 10.1016/S1470-2045(03)01196-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wu Y, Zhang Y, Cao L, Chen L, Lee V, Zheng PS, Kiani C, Adams ME, Ang LC, Paiwand F, et al: Identification of the motif in versican G3 domain that plays a dominant-negative effect on astrocytoma cell proliferation through inhibiting versican secretion and binding. J Biol Chem. 2001, 276 (17): 14178-14186.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Previdi S, Maroni P, Matteucci E, Broggini M, Bendinelli P, Desiderio MA: Interaction between human-breast cancer metastasis and bone microenvironment through activated hepatocyte growth factor/Met and beta-catenin/Wnt pathways. Eur J Cancer. 2010, 46 (9): 1679-1691. 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.02.036.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Guelcher SA, Sterling JA: Contribution of Bone Tissue Modulus to Breast Cancer Metastasis to Bone. Cancer Microenviron. 2011, 4 (3): 247-259. 10.1007/s12307-011-0078-3.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Welch DR: Microarrays bring new insights into understanding of breast cancer metastasis to bone. Breast Cancer Res. 2004, 6 (2): 61-64.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/12/341/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.