Myeloid malignancies: mutations, models and management
© Murati et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 5 October 2011
Accepted: 30 June 2012
Published: 23 July 2012
Myeloid malignant diseases comprise chronic (including myelodysplastic syndromes, myeloproliferative neoplasms and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia) and acute (acute myeloid leukemia) stages. They are clonal diseases arising in hematopoietic stem or progenitor cells. Mutations responsible for these diseases occur in several genes whose encoded proteins belong principally to five classes: signaling pathways proteins (e.g. CBL, FLT3, JAK2, RAS), transcription factors (e.g. CEBPA, ETV6, RUNX1), epigenetic regulators (e.g. ASXL1, DNMT3A, EZH2, IDH1, IDH2, SUZ12, TET2, UTX), tumor suppressors (e.g. TP53), and components of the spliceosome (e.g. SF3B1, SRSF2). Large-scale sequencing efforts will soon lead to the establishment of a comprehensive repertoire of these mutations, allowing for a better definition and classification of myeloid malignancies, the identification of new prognostic markers and therapeutic targets, and the development of novel therapies. Given the importance of epigenetic deregulation in myeloid diseases, the use of drugs targeting epigenetic regulators appears as a most promising therapeutic approach.
Myeloid malignancies are clonal diseases of hematopoietic stem or progenitor cells. They result from genetic and epigenetic alterations that perturb key processes such as self-renewal, proliferation and differentiation. They comprise chronic stages such as myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN), myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) and acute stages, i.e acute myeloid leukemia (AML). AML can occur de novo (~80% of the cases) or follow a chronic stage (secondary AML). According to the karyotype, AMLs can be subdivided into AML with favorable, intermediate or unfavorable cytogenetic risk . MPNs comprise a variety of disorders such as chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and non-CML MPNs such as polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET) and primary myelofibrosis (PMF).
Molecular biology has always been important in hematology, especially myeloid malignant diseases. Currently however, except in some specific examples such as the BCR-ABL1 fusion in CML, and NPM1 or FLT3 mutations in de novo AML, molecular data are not associated with optimal clinical and therapeutic exploitation in the clinic. This may change with the flurry of new data that are being generated. It all started with the discovery of the JAK2V617F mutation in MPNs [2–5]. Like the characterization of the BCR-ABL1 fusion kinase, which has led to the development of an efficient targeted therapy , this breakthrough showed how much progress can be made by the identification of a single molecular event regarding disease definition, understanding and classification, prognosis assessment, clinical monitoring and treatment. Since then, many new mutated genes have been identified. They affect various cell processes such as signaling, regulation of gene transcription and epigenetics, mRNA splicing and others. The aim of this review is not to describe these results in detail; this has been done in several excellent recently-published reviews [7–16]. Without putting emphasis on a particular gene, disease or cell process, it is more to discuss how the new data may improve our global vision of leukemogenesis and may be used for progress in at least three directions.
Understanding molecular leukemogenesis
Identification of new mutations
The genetic events involved in leukemogenesis have been deciphered by using two approaches. First, genomic alterations have been identified by using karyotype analysis and DNA hybridization onto oligonucleotide arrays (SNP-arrays, array-CGH); several types of genomic profiles have been found: lack of detectable changes, uniparental disomies (UPD), losses of chromosomes or large chromosomal regions, trisomies, losses or gains of small regions or genes. Second, small gene mutations have been detected by classical Sanger sequencing [17–22] or, more recently, by the use of new technologies such as next generation sequencing (NGS) [23–31].
Mutations in leukemogenic genes have been described in detail in recent reviews [7, 9, 10, 12–16, 43]; and will not be reviewed here. We will rather delve on the questions aroused by these recent data.
Have we already identified the entire repertoire of mutated genes?
We may have identified (most of) the major culprits . First, there are hundreds of background mutations (i.e. that do not provide selective advantage) but only a limited number of driver mutations (i.e. that cause the disease) in each malignant disease. Second, many of the newly discovered mutated genes may affect the same pathways or networks as the major mutated genes. For example, deletions and mutations of NF1, which have been recently identified [17, 44, 45], or PTPN11 are thought to have the same effect as a RAS mutation; a mutation of the SHKBP1 gene  or a duplication of the SH3KBP1 gene , which both encode cytoplasmic regulators of the CBL pathway, may have the same effect as a CBL mutation [49, 50]. Because EZH2, EED and SUZ12 proteins all belong to the same polycomb complex 2 (PRC2) the rare deletions or mutations of the EED[23, 51] and SUZ12 genes [17, 51] could have the same effect as EZH2 mutations. Third, several genes (e.g. ETV6 or RUNX1) can be structurally altered by mechanisms other than mutation, such as deletions and breakages. Fourth, some important regulatory genes could be affected not by structural alteration but through other mechanisms such as abnormal DNA methylation (e.g. CDKN2A/B, TRIM33, CTNNA1, SOCS1[56, 57]), histone modifications, mRNA splicing, microRNA or long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) modulation, or product degradation. Fifth, when all known mutated genes are analyzed in a series of cases, the percentage of samples with at least one mutated candidate driver gene varies from 50%  to over 90% (in CMML; ; Gelsi-Boyer et al., submitted). Moreover, most samples studied by NGS were shown to harbor gene mutations [23, 26]. Thus, we are soon approaching the days where all cases can be defined by combination of several alterations. The practical definition of leukemogenesis will then be based on a specific and limited repertoire of alterations, including translocations, mutations and copy number changes, affecting a defined set of driver genes.
However, some issues still need be addressed. First, many genes may be mutated or deleted with a very low frequency (i.e. under 1%); their involvement and recurrence may be hard to demonstrate. Second, because NGS studies of several malignancies have shown that hundreds of genes can be mutated in a single tumor, background mutations should be discarded and driver genes validated. Third, we still miss information in some diseases such as essential thrombocythemia (ET), in which JAK2 mutations are found in only half the cases, and TET2 mutations in less than 10%. We also lack knowledge about the targeted genes of some frequent genomic alterations such as the 20q11-q13 deletion (ASXL1 and DNMT3B, more centromeric, are not involved). Fortunately, this lack of information is bound to disappear. The example of refractory anemia with ring sideroblasts (RARS) is instructive; in three-quarters of RARS, mutations have been recently found in SF3B1, a gene encoding a subunit of a splicing factor (U2 snRNP) and histone acetyltransferase (STAGA) complexes [27, 29, 31].
Is there some specificity in gene alterations?
Gene fusions (e.g. BCR-ABL1, PML-RARA, FGFR1-associated fusions…), 5q deletion and JAK2 mutations are specific of some forms of myeloid diseases, although JAK2 mutations occur in three distinct subtypes of MPN. RUNX1 mutations are frequent in MDSs, CMML and AML but rare in MPNs. Among splicing factor genes, mutations in SF3B1 are highly specific of MDS with ring sideroblasts and SRSF2 mutations are most frequent in CMML . In contrast, some mutated genes (e.g. ASXL1, DNMT3A, EZH2, TET2) occur in a wide range of myeloid diseases and with various frequencies. Future studies may identify mutations or combinations of mutations that drive a specific phenotype.
What are the functions of the mutated proteins ?
In chronic stages, alterations in signaling molecules can be grouped in two major categories, a first one that is found in MPNs and affects oncogenic tyrosine kinases (ABL1, JAK2, FGFR1, PDGFRs) and the downstream JAK-STAT and/or PI3-kinase pathways, and a second one that is mutated in CMML and affect the RAS-MAP kinase pathway (RAS, PTPN11, NF1). CBL alterations occur in a wide variety of myeloid diseases .
The recent reports of the interrelated functions of IDH1/2 and TET2 in DNA methylation represent a major breakthrough in our understanding of leukemogenesis . It was initially hard to associate mutations of IDH1 and IDH2, two metabolic enzymes, with mutations in TET2, an unknown gene product, and as hard to suspect their role on DNA methylation. A very rapid series of elegant studies have shown i) that IDH1/2 and TET2 mutations are mutually exclusive in myeloid malignancies , ii) that mutated IDH1 and IDH2 produce 2-hydroxyglutarate instead of alpha-ketoglutarate (αKG) [69, 70], iii) that TET2 encodes an αKG–dependent methyl cytosine dioxygenase whose mutation alters the conversion of 5-methylcytosine (5-mC) to 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5-hmC) [68, 71] and iv) that both IDH1/2 and TET2 mutations impact on DNA methylation and are involved in the same biochemical pathway . In addition, TET proteins can generate from 5-hmC 5-formylcytosine and 5-carboxylcytosine, but their roles are currently unknown . The recent studies on TET proteins suggest a role in removing aberrant DNA methylation to ensure DNA methylation fidelity . This has opened a new area of research since first, other factors involved in DNA demethylation may exist and second, several αKG–dependent enzymes, such as jumonji histone demethylases  are epigenetic regulators; therefore, some of these proteins could also be involved in malignancies. However, IDH1/2 and TET2 mutations, while mutually exclusive, are not equivalent because IDH1/2 mutations are more frequent in acute than in chronic myeloid diseases, whereas it is not the case for TET2 alterations, which are more evenly distributed between chronic and acute stages. Inactivation of TET2 increases self-renewal in hematopoietic stem cells and induces a disease resembling CMML in mouse models [76, 77]. Mutated IDH1/2 enzymes may impact on self-renewal but with a different strength. The likely explanation is that IDH1/2 and TET2 have other, non-overlapping functions on the regulation of DNA methylation and histone marks. Also, an IDH-mutated product may depend on another, rate-limiting factor to exert a leukemogenic effect. DNMT3A is a de novo DNA methyltransferase involved in the formation of 5-mC and has complex interactions with polycomb and HMT proteins . How DNMT3A mutations affect DNA methylation remains to be defined [24, 30, 79]; they probably do so in a different way from TET2 or IDH1/2 mutations since they may co-occur with either of them. A recent study showed that DNMT3A loss leads to upregulation of hematopoietic stem cell genes and downregulation of differentiation genes but is alone insufficient to induce a malignant disease in a mouse model .
Mutations in regulators of histone marks have become a major subject of research and the relationships between them are quickly unveiled. Central regulators of myelopoiesis and key players in leukemogenesis seem to be the polycomb regulatory complexes, especially PRC2, which, in addition to direct defects of its components (EED, EZH2, SUZ12), could be affected in its concerted action with several ERs, such as ASXL1, cohesins, DNMT3A, IDH1/2, MLL, TET2 and UTX. TET proteins could regulate pluripotency and self-renewal through interaction with PRC2 [74, 80, 81]. The cohesin complex is encoded by four genes (SMC1, SMC3, RAD21 and STAG2), which have been found mutated  and deleted . A major interactor of cohesin complex is CTCF. PRC2 is recruited to specific loci through interaction of SUZ12 with CTCF . Another main leukemogenic interactor of PRC2 components is ASXL1. A recent study showed that ASXL1 loss affects PRC2 complexes and H3K27me3 histone marks, and induces a strong hematopoietic phenotype consistent with an MDS in a conditional knock-out mouse model . ASXL1 would direct PRC2 to leukemogenic loci such as HOXA genes. Thus, through direct alterations of its components or of proteins or lncRNAs  that recruit the complex, PRC2 has emerged as a key node in a network regulating hematopoietic stem cell self-renewal and proliferation and as a major factor in myeloid leukemogenesis. This is also true for T-cell leukemogenesis . Correct functioning of polycomb repressive complex 1 (PRC1) seems also to be important for myeloid cells since the loss of BMI1 (a component of PRC1) in the mouse leads to a disease similar to PMF . Structural alterations of the BMI1 gene occur but are rare in human myeloid diseases .
Whether other chromatin-associated complexes play a role in leukemogenesis should soon be revealed. ASXL1 could play a role in a cross-talk between major chromatin silencing systems, PRC1/PRC2, HP1α/CBX5 heterochromatin repressive complex and polycomb repressive deubiquitinase (PR-DUB) complex. Mutations in BCOR and BCORL1 suggest that the RAF/BCOR complex [84, 88] might be involved in AML. The recent identification of a mutation in the DAXX gene in an AML case  further supports a wide participation of chromatin-regulatory complexes in leukemogenesis and cancer in general. DAXX and ATRX (which is mutated in X-linked α-thalassemia) are subunits of a chromatin remodeling complex and are both mutated in solid tumors [89, 90].
The importance of the fifth class of mutated genes was more unexpected. Mutations in components of the spliceosome, which are mutually exclusive, lead to splicing defects including exon skipping, intron retention and use of incorrect splice site . A recent study showed that a consequence of splicing gene mutations is accumulation of unspliced transcripts affecting a specific subset of mRNAs .
What are the effects of the gene mutations?
The dominant-positive effects of oncogenes such as BCR-ABL1, mutated FLT3, JAK2 or RAS, have been easy to apprehend. CBL and LNK mutations inactivate brakes on signaling pathways and may have a dominant-negative effect. TET2 is inactivated in the manner of a tumor suppressor. EZH2 is frequently associated with UPD and acts as a TSG. A frequent form of defect seems to be haplo-insufficiency , which could be associated with the (generally) heterozygous loss or mutation of ASXL1, NF1, NPM1, TP53, RUNX1 or TET2. Neo-functionalization results from IDH1/2 mutations, which are always mono-allelic. For genes altered through different mechanisms (mutations, deletions or translocations) such as RUNX1 or with different types of mutations (hotspot or dispersed) such as DNMT3A, the function might be variably affected and some mutants may have a dominant-negative effect. Mutations in spliceosome genes are mostly missense and could result in proteins with a modified but not inactivated function.
Mutations in signaling pathways, transcription networks and splicing machinery have many downstream consequences. Modifications in epigenetic regulation of DNA and histones may have a strong amplifying effect since they impact on the transcription of thousands of genes. This in turn impacts on the properties of hematopoietic stem cells, favoring self-renewal and proliferation over differentiation, thus promoting leukemogenesis . However, chimeric proteins involving TFs and ERs (e.g. MLL, MYST3, NSD1 …) may induce a stronger effect than mutations in other TFs and ERs (such as ASXL1, EZH2 or TET2), which may need to co-occur with several other alterations to trigger AML, often after a chronic phase. Perhaps like the difference between a water jet and a sprinkling rain, this difference may have to do with the specific functions of TFs and ERs . TF and ER fusion proteins assemble in complexes that are directly recruited to their target genes where they modify the local histone marks, drastically altering transcription. In contrast, mutated ERs may moderately perturb the epigenetic network, resulting in global gene deregulation.
Mutations in spliceosome components may lead to several types of deregulation, including alterations of the epigenetic control of differentiation and self-renewal; they may thus result in the same defects as TF and ER mutations. This may derive from splicing aberrations of leukemogenic genes (e.g. RUNX1)  or from other specific but indirect defects. SF3B1 for example interacts with components of the polycomb repressor complex 1 (PRC1) and SF3B1 mutations may compromise PRC1 regulation of leukemogenic loci . Reciprocally, the function of the pre-mRNA splicing machinery involves the reading of histone marks, and defective chromatin regulators may affect splicing . Directly or indirectly, SF3B1 mutations, which are associated with the presence of ring sideroblasts, are likely to affect genes involved in red cell biology and mitochondria function. Because mutations in splicing genes, in TFs and in ERs are not mutually exclusive it is probable that the three types of alterations have additive rather than interchangeable effects.
Modeling molecular leukemogenesis
Are there preferential combinations and mutual exclusions?
Two driver mutations may never occur together (mutual exclusion) in the same cell because of epistasis (two hits in the same pathway are not selected because they do not provide a growth advantage) or synthetic lethality (two hits are counter-selected because they compromise the life of the leukemic cell). Associations and cooperation can occur in all other cases.
Some chronic myeloid malignancies, such as CMML (myeloproliferative form, MP-CMML) and MPNs, have a proliferative component. This component is driven by alterations in signaling molecules, such as CBL, CBLB, FLT3, JAK2, LNK, MPL, NF1, PTPN11 or RAS. These mutations are generally mutually exclusive. However, JAK2 mutations can be found in patients with mutations of CBL LNK or MPL[95–97]. In most cases when two signaling mutations are found in the same patient they are not in the same cellular clone. Signaling mutations associate with mutations in genes from the other classes (TSGs, TFs, ERs). CBL and KIT mutations are more frequent in AML with t(8;21) and inv(16), i.e. with alterations of the core binding factor (CBF), a dimeric transcriptional factor containing the RUNX1 protein .
As already mentioned, IDH1 or IDH2 mutations are mutually exclusive with TET2 mutations. Except for this, TET2 mutations seem to be able to cooperate with either of the other recurrent alterations. ASXL1 mutations, which occur preferentially in secondary AML, are mutually exclusive with NPM1 mutations, which occur in de novo AML . Although ASXL1 interacts with PRC2 proteins ASXL1 and EZH2 mutations are not mutually exclusive . Mutations in EED and SUZ12 may even be found in the same AML case ; however, they may affect different clones. RUNX1 mutations are frequently associated with ASXL1 defects in MDSs . Mutations in ASXL1 and TET2 can be concomitant (Figure 1), and each can co-occur with mutations in signaling molecules [58, 100]. In MDSs, U2AF1 mutations are more frequent in ASXL1-mutated than in ASXL1-wildtype cases [38, 42]. TP53 mutations and losses, likely associated with genetic instability, are found in MDSs with karyotypic alterations but not in cases with normal karyotype . DNMT3A mutations are more frequent in AML with NPM1 and FLT3 mutations, infrequently found in ASXL1-mutated cases, and very rare in cases with translocations [24, 101]. Overall, while IDH1/2 and TET2 mutations are equally distributed, there seem to be two major associations in AMLs with intermediate cytogenetic risk, ASXL1/RUNX1 on the one hand (secondary, dysplastic AMLs), NPM1/FLT3/DNMT3A on the other hand (primary, non-dysplastic AMLs) . These and other associations and exclusions not described here or yet to be discovered will help understand the major leukemogenic pathways. An important issue is to demonstrate that mutations found in the same case are actually cooperating mutations that co-occur in the same cell progeny and not in different clones.
How many hits are necessary to trigger a malignant myeloid disease?
Early studies of chronic and acute hematopoietic malignant diseases have shown that some cases may display a single mutational event whereas others harbor several hits . This difference may just be due to the low mutational frequency of many driver genes (e.g. NF1A, EED)  and to our current ignorance of other targets. Actually, NGS studies have shown that the general rule is to find several altered genes in each case [23, 26, 59, 103] and murine models have shown that single alterations are, except in rare cases, not sufficient to cause AML [104, 105]. In the years to come mouse models will have to challenge many combinations of mutations.
The study of matched chronic and acute stages has shown that progression is associated with additional alterations. However, the chronic stages are already characterized by the presence of several mutations. We found that many cases of CMML have already four mutations , and this was without counting mutations in splicing factors. JAK2 and TET2 concomitant mutations are frequent in MPNs [16, 37]. Whether they are both necessary for the various phases of the disease and their order of appearance are a matter of debate . An NGS study indeed showed that the ten mutations identified in an MDS patient can be detected together in most studied single cells, suggesting a linear evolution of the disease and the existence of a dominant clone . Regarding evolution of AML after therapy, a recent NGS study has revealed two major patterns at relapse ; the first pattern is the persistence of a dominant clone and the second pattern is the selection and expansion of a minor clone; in both cases the relapse clone had gained additional mutations. Another recent NGS study showed that genetic evolution of secondary AML is a dynamic process shaped by multiple cycles of mutation acquisition and clonal selection. MDS are oligoclonal with founding clones; these clones persist in secondary AML, which shows at least an additional subclone with new “progression” mutations . Founding mutations may occur in various genes, such as U2AF1 or TET2. Many different genes may be involved in progression. Thus, several steps are necessary to trigger a myeloid disease, even a so-called chronic one, and progression involves additional hits.
How many of these steps are there?
A first step in the leukemogenic process is likely to be a mere clonal expansion. Several gene mutations may play a role at this stage. Their identity may depend on whether they target a hematopoietic stem cell or a progenitor. In the first case the initial hit should provide a proliferation boost, in the second the hit should bestow self-renewal on the proliferating progenitor . Mutations in a TSG, splicing gene, or in some ERs such as TET2, could occur at this initial step. It is also possible that, in a susceptible background, several clones emerge independently early on [12, 109].
Then, because of increasing proliferation and genetic instability, a cell from the affected clone (or clones) undergoes various additional mutations (including many background mutations), leading to an oligoclonal malignant tumor. Some of the early mutations may not be present in the clone that eventually becomes leukemic. Thus, for each case, only the determination of all potential mutations and the reconstitution of the mutation profile and clonal evolution will help understand the pathophysiology of the disease. This is now achievable by using NGS. How many steps can eventually be individualized may depend on how many clones are initially expanded, on the level of genetic instability that results from the initial hits, and on the impact of the mutations on self-renewal, differentiation and proliferation. Some mutations in epigenetic regulators may have a milder effect on genetic reprogramming than a gene fusion involving a master transcription factor, which will induce a strong block of differentiation in a hematopoietic precursor . The latter event is prominent in de novo AMLs, which accordingly display only few or none of the other recently-discovered mutated genes.
A previous scheme of leukemogenesis  was based on the minimal cooperation of two oncogene classes, proliferation-drivers (kinases, RAS) and differentiation-blockers (mostly transcription factors), to trigger AML. The ever-increasing molecular complexity of myeloid malignancies is now obvious and calls for an update of this model. First, it is now routinely possible to observe the cooperation, already at the chronic stage, of three, four or more mutated genes (to speak only of known or suspected drivers), whose products belong to at least five classes, class I signaling molecules class II TFs, class III ERs, class IV TSGs and class V splicing factors . Second, not all mutations of a class are equivalent; mutations in ASXL1, RUNX1 or TET2 occur almost as frequently at the chronic stages as in AML whereas mutations of IDH1/2 or DNMT3A are preferentially found at the acute stage. The reason for this remains obscure but may have to do with the different intensities in the differentiation block induced by the mutations. Third, the classes are not well individualized. For example, EZH2, RUNX1 and TET2 are both TSGs and TF/ERs. NF1 is both a TSG and a regulator of signaling pathways. Because it induces phosphorylation of histone H3 and PRMT5 arginine methyltransferase, JAK2V617F may also be an ER . Fourth, all classes may not be systematically affected in each case. Fifth, if classes I and V are relatively well individualized, with genes whose mutations are generally mutually exclusive, the definition of the other classes may evolve. However, despite all this, the initial schematic model might not be so far off. The two key processes of differentiation and self-renewal seem to be always altered and proliferation is frequently affected. It may just be that the oncogenic hits required to achieve each step might be more numerous than initially expected. This model will apply to cases with intermediate or normal cytogenetic risk; a different leukemogenesis pathway linked to genetic instability may be involved in cases with TP53 mutation and complex karyotype .
Utilizing molecular leukemogenesis
Understanding and modeling leukemogenesis will have a major impact on the management and treatment of hematopoietic malignancies. Molecular biology already helps establish the diagnosis (JAK2), classification (BCR-ABL1, FGFR1, PDGFRs), prognosis (FLT3, NPM1, CEBPA) and treatment (BCR-ABL, 5q-, JAK2) of myeloid diseases. Due to the increasing simplification and accessibility to clinical laboratories of NGS equipment, the repertoire of all genetic alterations will soon be determined for any new case as a routine practice.
The establishment of a precise taxonomy comprising homogeneous pathophysiological entities is a major goal in hematology. It relies heavily on molecular data. It started with the karyotype and has continued with gene expression profiles [115, 116]. Gene mutations will nicely complete the picture. Other factors such as microRNAs and long non-coding RNAs status , methylation profiles  and histone marks may have to be integrated too.
Several studies have shown that gene mutations have indeed a major impact on prognosis of myeloid diseases. This is the case in MDSs for mutations in five genes, ASXL1, ETV6, EZH2, TP53 and RUNX1. Mutations in ASXL1 seem to be associated with an aggressive phenotype in all myeloid malignancies : they are frequent in high-risk MDSs and correlate with poor prognosis in MDSs [118–120] and with acute progression in CMML , they are more frequent in myelofibrosis than in other MPNs [37, 121], and characterize secondary AML. DNMT3A mutations are frequent in younger patients with AML and are associated with an unfavorable prognosis in MDS and AML [15, 24, 30, 101]. Among splicing gene mutations, those in U2AF1 and SRSF2 seem to be associated with aggressive forms of myeloid diseases and those in SF3B1 with good prognosis [38, 39, 41, 42]. Molecular data will allow the establishment of an upgraded index of prognosis. For example, in MDSs, it is highly conceivable that the current prognostic index used for the evaluation of the disease (IPSS), which already includes karyotypic data, can be improved by a molecular index regrouping the mutations that impact on the patient’s outcome . Whether TET2 mutations are to be included is a matter of debate [122–124]. In AML, a thorough study of 18 genes, including ASXL1 and DNMT3A, proposed an updated and precise risk stratification based on gene mutations .
New therapeutic targets can be found in two of the five major classes of leukemogenic genes. Following the successful use of imatinib in CML, abnormal signaling pathways associated with myeloproliferation, be it the JAK-STAT pathway [126–128] or another pathway, represent appealing targets. Drugs targeting epigenetic modifications, i.e. epidrugs, such as histone deacetylase inhibitors and hypomethylating agents (DNMT inhibitors), are currently developed or used in clinics, and many new ones are studied in preclinical assays and clinical trials . Targeting histone methyltransferases (e.g. MLL) or lysine acetyltransferases (e.g. P300)  is also a promising area of development. The determination of gene mutations and their consequence on gene regulation and cell programming will help treat myeloid malignancies in providing a rationale for the use and development of new epidrugs, in directing the choice of the drug cocktails, and in allowing the design of drug delivery and the monitoring of drug response and disease progression. For example, agents directed against TET2-, IDH- and DNMT3A-associated methylation defects may represent a new area of development. To date, the use of TET2 mutations status to evaluate the response to DNMT inhibitors is still debated [130, 131]. Because many mutations compromise PRC2 function drugs antagonizing this defect hold great promise.
Proteins of two other leukemogenic classes may also serve as therapeutic targets. For example, the antitumor macrolide pladienolide targets SF3B1  opening new opportunities to develop treatments against RARS. Compounds aiming at restoring a normal P53 pathway are in development [133, 134].
The existence of concomitant mutations is an incentive for combinatorial therapies; for example, therapeutic synergy may be obtained by the combined use of signaling inhibitors and epidrugs.
Finally, the complete determination of the mutation repertoire will provide novel therapeutic targets. For some diseases, such as CMML, it is already possible to identify at least one target for nearly nine cases out of ten [33, 36]. However, the development of resistance, as observed with imatinib , is a critical issue. Hopefully, target identification will allow for the development of new combinatorial strategies, such as the one based on synthetic lethality [136, 137]. If two mutations never occur together it may mean that their combined effect is deleterious. Thus, opportunities for deriving synthetic lethality drugs could stem from the observation of exclusions in mutations patterns.
Thus, mutations and models (“M and Ms”) will help manage myeloid malignancies. The eventual comprehensive determination in any given case and at diagnosis, of the set of altered genes, underlying affected pathways and disease stage, will guide towards an optimal treatment based on an appropriate combination of drugs targeting the various affected processes of the disease. Clinically-oriented laboratories should already be preparing for that challenge. Meanwhile, there is much to mull over the “M and Ms” of myeloid malignancies.
All authors have contributed ideas, discussions, and have participated in the writing of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
We are grateful to O. Bernard for his critical reading of the manuscript. Work in our laboratory on this subject is supported by Inserm, Institut Paoli-Calmettes and grants from the Association pour la Recherche contre le Cancer (DB) and Association Laurette Fugain (MJM).
- Chen J, Odenike O, Rowley JD: Leukaemogenesis: more than mutant genes. Nat Rev Cancer. 2010, 10: 23-36.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Baxter EJ, Scott LM, Campbell PJ, East C, Fourouclas N, Swanton S, Vassiliou GS, Bench AJ, Boyd EM, Curtin N, Scott MA, Erber WN, Green AR: Acquired mutation of the tyrosine kinase JAK2 in human myeloproliferative disorders. Lancet. 2005, 365: 1054-1061.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- James C, Ugo V, Le Couedic JP, Staerk J, Delhommeau F, Lacout C, Garcon L, Raslova H, Berger R, Bennaceur-Griscelli A, Villeval JL, Constantinescu SN, Casadevall N, Vainchenker W: A unique clonal JAK2 mutation leading to constitutive signalling causes polycythaemia vera. Nature. 2005, 434: 1144-1148.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kralovics R, Passamonti F, Buser AS, Teo SS, Tiedt R, Passweg JR, Tichelli A, Cazzola M, Skoda RC: A gain-of-function mutation of JAK2 in myeloproliferative disorders. N Engl J Med. 2005, 352: 1779-1790.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Levine RL, Wadleigh M, Cools J, Ebert BL, Wernig G, Huntly BJ, Boggon TJ, Wlodarska I, Clark JJ, Moore S, Adelsperger J, Koo S, Lee JC, Gabriel S, Mercher T, D'Andrea A, Frohling S, Dohner K, Marynen P, Vandenberghe P, Mesa RA, Tefferi A, Griffin JD, Eck MJ, Sellers WR, Meyerson M, Golub TR, Lee SJ, Gilliland DG: Activating mutation in the tyrosine kinase JAK2 in polycythemia vera, essential thrombocythemia, and myeloid metaplasia with myelofibrosis. Cancer Cell. 2005, 7: 387-397.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Druker BJ, Tamura S, Buchdunger E, Ohno S, Segal GM, Fanning S, Zimmermann J, Lydon NB: Effects of a selective inhibitor of the Abl tyrosine kinase on the growth of Bcr-Abl positive cells. Nat Med. 1996, 2: 561-566.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fathi AT, Abdel-Wahab O: Mutations in epigenetic modifiers in myeloid malignancies and the prospect of novel epigenetic-targeted therapy. Adv Hematol. 2012, 2012: 469592-PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gelsi-Boyer V, Brecqueville M, Devillier R, Murati A, Mozziconacci MJ, Birnbaum D: Mutations in ASXL1 are associated with poor prognosis across the spectrum of malignant myeloid diseases. J Hematol Oncol. 2012, 5: 12-PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Graubert TA, Walter MJ: Genetics of Myelodysplastic Syndromes: New Insights. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2011, 1: 543-549.Google Scholar
- Marcucci G, Haferlach T, Dohner H: Molecular genetics of adult acute myeloid leukemia: prognostic and therapeutic implications. J Clin Oncol. 2011, 29: 475-486.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mercher T, Quivoron C, Couronne L, Bastard C, Vainchenker W, Bernard OA: TET2, a tumor suppressor in hematological disorders. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012, 1825: 173-177.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schaub FX, Jager R, Looser R, Hao-Shen H, Hermouet S, Girodon F, Tichelli A, Gisslinger H, Kralovics R, Skoda RC: Clonal analysis of deletions on chromosome 20q and JAK2-V617F in MPD suggests that del20q acts independently and is not one of the predisposing mutations for JAK2-V617F. Blood. 2009, 113: 2022-2027.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Takahashi S: Current findings for recurring mutations in acute myeloid leukemia. J Hematol Oncol. 2011, 4: 36-PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Tefferi A: Mutations galore in myeloproliferative neoplasms: Would the real Spartacus please stand up?. Leukemia. 2011, 25: 1059-1063.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Thol F, Damm F, Ludeking A, Winschel C, Wagner K, Morgan M, Yun H, Gohring G, Schlegelberger B, Hoelzer D, Lubbert M, Kanz L, Fiedler W, Kirchner H, Heil G, Krauter J, Ganser A, Heuser M: Incidence and Prognostic Influence of DNMT3A Mutations in Acute Myeloid Leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2011, 29: 2889-2896.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vainchenker W, Delhommeau F, Constantinescu SN, Bernard OA: New mutations and pathogenesis of myeloproliferative neoplasms. Blood. 2011, 118: 1723-1735.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brecqueville M, Cervera N, Adélaide J, Rey J, Carbuccia N, Chaffanet M, Vey N, Birnbaum D, Murati A: Mutations and deletions of the SUZ12 polycomb gene in myeloproliferative neoplasms. Blood Cancer Journal. 2011, 1: e18-PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Delhommeau F, Dupont S, Della VV, James C, Trannoy S, Masse A, Kosmider O, Le Couedic JP, Robert F, Alberdi A, Lecluse Y, Plo I, Dreyfus FJ, Marzac C, Casadevall N, Lacombe C, Romana SP, Dessen P, Soulier J, Viguie F, Fontenay M, Vainchenker W, Bernard OA: Mutation in TET2 in myeloid cancers. N Engl J Med. 2009, 360: 2289-2301.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dunbar AJ, Gondek LP, O'Keefe CL, Makishima H, Rataul MS, Szpurka H, Sekeres MA, Wang XF, McDevitt MA, Maciejewski JP: 250 K single nucleotide polymorphism array karyotyping identifies acquired uniparental disomy and homozygous mutations, including novel missense substitutions of c-Cbl, in myeloid malignancies. Cancer Res. 2008, 68: 10349-10357.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Ernst T, Chase AJ, Score J, Hidalgo-Curtis CE, Bryant C, Jones AV, Waghorn K, Zoi K, Ross FM, Reiter A, Hochhaus A, Drexler HG, Duncombe A, Cervantes F, Oscier D, Boultwood J, Grand FH, Cross NC: Inactivating mutations of the histone methyltransferase gene EZH2 in myeloid disorders. Nat Genet. 2010, 42: 722-726.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gelsi-Boyer V, Trouplin V, Adélaide J, Bonansea J, Cervera N, Carbuccia N, Lagarde A, Prebet T, Nezri M, Sainty D, Olschwang S, Xerri L, Chaffanet M, Mozziconacci MJ, Vey N, Birnbaum D: Mutations of polycomb-associated gene ASXL1 in myelodysplastic syndromes and chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia. Br J Haematol. 2009, 145: 788-800.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nikoloski G, Langemeijer SM, Kuiper RP, Knops R, Massop M, Tonnissen ER, van der Heijden A, Scheele TN, Vandenberghe P: de WT, van der Reijden BA, Jansen JH: Somatic mutations of the histone methyltransferase gene EZH2 in myelodysplastic syndromes. Nat Genet. 2010, 42: 665-667.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ding L, Ley TJ, Larson DE, Miller CA, Koboldt DC, Welch JS, Ritchey JK, Young MA, Lamprecht T, McLellan MD, McMichael JF, Wallis JW, Lu C, Shen D, Harris CC, Dooling DJ, Fulton RS, Fulton LL, Chen K, Schmidt H, Kalicki-Veizer J, Magrini VJ, Cook L, McGrath SD, Vickery TL, Wendl MC, Heath S, Watson MA, Link DC, Tomasson MH, Shannon WD, Payton JE, Kulkarni S, Westervelt P, Walter MJ, Graubert TA, Mardis ER, Wilson RK, DiPersio JF: Clonal evolution in relapsed acute myeloid leukaemia revealed by whole-genome sequencing. Nature. 2012, 481: 506-510.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Ley TJ, Ding L, Walter MJ, McLellan MD, Lamprecht T, Larson DE, Kandoth C, Payton JE, Baty J, Welch J, Harris CC, Lichti CF, Townsend RR, Fulton RS, Dooling DJ, Koboldt DC, Schmidt H, Zhang Q, Osborne JR, Lin L, O'Laughlin M, McMichael JF, Delehaunty KD, McGrath SD, Fulton LA, Magrini VJ, Vickery TL, Hundal J, Cook LL, Conyers JJ, Swift GW, Reed JP, Alldredge PA, Wylie T, Walker J, Kalicki J, Watson MA, Heath S, Shannon WD, Varghese N, Nagarajan R, Westervelt P, Tomasson MH, Link DC, Graubert TA, DiPersio JF, Mardis ER, Wilson RK: DNMT3A mutations in acute myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2010, 363: 2424-2433.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Li M, Collins R, Jiao Y, Ouillette P, Bixby D, Erba H, Vogelstein B, Kinzler KW, Papadopoulos N, Malek SN: Somatic mutations in the transcriptional corepressor gene BCORL1 in adult acute myelogenous leukemia. Blood. 2011, 118: 5914-5917.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Mardis ER, Ding L, Dooling DJ, Larson DE, McLellan MD, Chen K, Koboldt DC, Fulton RS, Delehaunty KD, McGrath SD, Fulton LA, Locke DP, Magrini VJ, Abbott RM, Vickery TL, Reed JS, Robinson JS, Wylie T, Smith SM, Carmichael L, Eldred JM, Harris CC, Walker J, Peck JB, Du F, Dukes AF, Sanderson GE, Brummett AM, Clark E, McMichael JF, Meyer RJ, Schindler JK, Pohl CS, Wallis JW, Shi X, Lin L, Schmidt H, Tang Y, Haipek C, Wiechert ME, Ivy JV, Kalicki J, Elliott G, Ries RE, Payton JE, Westervelt P, Tomasson MH, Watson MA, Baty J, Heath S, Shannon WD, Nagarajan R, Link DC, Walter MJ, Graubert TA, DiPersio JF, Wilson RK, Ley TJ: Recurring mutations found by sequencing an acute myeloid leukemia genome. N Engl J Med. 2009, 361: 1058-1066.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Papaemmanuil E, Cazzola M, Boultwood J, Malcovati L, Vyas P, Bowen D, Pellagati A, Wainscoat JS, Hellstrom-Lindberg E, Gambacorti-Passerini C, Godfrey AL, Cross JR, Green AR, Futreal PA, Stratton MR, Campbell PJ: Somatic mutation of SF3B1 in myelodysplasia with ring sideroblasts and other cancers. N Engl J Med. 2011, 365: 1384-1395.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Van Haaften G, Dalgliesh GL, Davies H, Chen L, Bignell G, Greenman C, Edkins S, Hardy C, O'Meara S, Teague J, Butler A, Hinton J, Latimer C, Andrews J, Barthorpe S, Beare D, Buck G, Campbell PJ, Cole J, Forbes S, Jia M, Jones D, Kok CY, Leroy C, Lin ML, McBride DJ, Maddison M, Maquire S, McLay K, Menzies A, Mironenko T, Mulderrig L, Mudie L, Pleasance E, Shepherd R, Smith R, Stebbings L, Stephens P, Tang G, Tarpey PS, Turner R, Turrell K, Varian J, West S, Widaa S, Wray P, Collins VP, Ichimura K, Law S, Wong J, Yuen ST, Leung SY, Tonon G, DePinho RA, Tai YT, Anderson KC, Kahnoski RJ, Massie A, Khoo SK, Teh BT, Stratton MR, Futreal PA: Somatic mutations of the histone H3K27 demethylase gene UTX in human cancer. Nat Genet. 2009, 41: 521-523.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Visconte V, Makishima H, Jankowska A, Szpurka H, Traina F, Jerez A, O'Keefe C, Rogers HJ, Sekeres MA, Maciejewski JP, Tiu RV: SF3B1, a splicing factor is frequently mutated in refractory anemia with ring sideroblasts. Leukemia. 2011, 26: 542-545.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yan XJ, Xu J, Gu ZH, Pan CM, Lu G, Shen Y, Shi JY, Zhu YM, Tang L, Zhang XW, Liang WX, Mi JQ, Song HD, Li KQ, Chen Z, Chen SJ: Exome sequencing identifies somatic mutations of DNA methyltransferase gene DNMT3A in acute monocytic leukemia. Nat Genet. 2011, 43: 309-315.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yoshida K, Sanada M, Shiraishi Y, Nowak D, Nagata Y, Yamamoto R, Sato Y, Sato-Otsubo A, Kon A, Nagasaki M, Chalkidis G, Suzuki Y, Shiosaka M, Kawahata R, Yamaguchi T, Otsu M, Obara N, Sakata-Yanagimoto M, Ishiyama K, Mori H, Nolte F, Hofmann WK, Miyawaki S, Sugano S, Haferlach C, Koeffler HP, Shih LY, Haferlach T, Chiba S, Nakauchi H, Miyano S, Ogawa S: Frequent pathway mutations of splicing machinery in myelodysplasia. Nature. 2011, 478: 64-69.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yamashita Y, Yuan J, Suetake I, Suzuki H, Ishikawa Y, Choi YL, Ueno T, Soda M, Hamada T, Haruta H, Takada S, Miyazaki Y, Kiyoi H, Ito E, Naoe T, Tomonaga M, Toyota M, Tajima S, Iwama A, Mano H: Array-based genomic resequencing of human leukemia. Oncogene. 2010, 29: 3723-3731.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jankowska AM, Makishima H, Tiu RV, Szpurka H, Huang Y, Traina F, Visconte V, Sugimoto Y, Prince C, O'Keefe C, Hsi ED, List A, Sekeres MA, Rao A, McDevitt MA, Maciejewski JP: Mutational spectrum analysis of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia includes genes associated with epigenetic regulation: UTX, EZH2 and DNMT3A. Blood. 2011, 118: 3932-3941.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Levine RL, Belisle C, Wadleigh M, Zahrieh D, Lee S, Chagnon P, Gilliland DG, Busque L: X-inactivation-based clonality analysis and quantitative JAK2V617F assessment reveal a strong association between clonality and JAK2V617F in PV but not ET/MMM, and identifies a subset of JAK2V617F-negative ET and MMM patients with clonal hematopoiesis. Blood. 2006, 107: 4139-4141.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Lippert E, Boissinot M, Kralovics R, Girodon F, Dobo I, Praloran V, Boiret-Dupre N, Skoda RC, Hermouet S: The JAK2-V617F mutation is frequently present at diagnosis in patients with essential thrombocythemia and polycythemia vera. Blood. 2006, 108: 1865-1867.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gelsi-Boyer V, Trouplin V, Roquain J, Adélaide J, Carbuccia N, Esterni B, Finetti P, Murati A, Arnoulet C, Zerazhi H, Fezoui H, Tadrist Z, Nezri M, Chaffanet M, Mozziconacci MJ, Vey N, Birnbaum D: ASXL1 mutation is associated with poor prognosis and acute transformation in chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia. Br J Haematol. 2010, 151: 365-375.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brecqueville M, Rey J, Bertucci F, Coppin E, Finetti P, Carbuccia N, Cervera N, Gelsi-Boyer V, Arnoulet C, Gisserot O, Verrot D, Slama B, Vey N, Mozziconacci MJ, Birnbaum D, Murati A: Mutation analysis of ASXL1, CBL, DNMT3A, IDH1, IDH2, JAK2, MPL, NF1, SF3B1, SUZ12, and TET2 in myeloproliferative neoplasms. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2012, 51: 743-755.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Damm F, Kosmider O, Gelsi-Boyer V, Renneville A, Carbuccia N, Curtis CH, Della-Valle V, Couronne L, Scourzic L, Chesnais V, Guerci-Bresler A, Slama B, Beyne-Rauzy O, Schmidt-Tanguy A, Stamatoullas-Bastard A, Dreyfus F, Prebet T, De Botton S, Vey N, Morgan M, Cross JR, Preudhomme C, Birnbaum D, Bernard O, Fontenay M: Mutations affecting mRNA splicing define distinct clinical phenotypes and correlate with patient outcome in myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood. 2012, 119: 3211-3218.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Graubert TA, Shen D, Ding L, Okeyo-Owuor T, Lunn CL, Shao J, Krysiak K, Harris CC, Koboldt DC, Larson DE, McLellan MD, Dooling DJ, Abbott RM, Fulton RS, Schmidt H, Kalicki-Veizer J, O'Laughlin M, Grillot M, Baty J, Heath S, Frater JL, Nasim T, Link DC, Tomasson MH, Westervelt P, DiPersio JF, Mardis ER, Ley TJ, Wilson RK, Walter MJ: Recurrent mutations in the U2AF1 splicing factor in myelodysplastic syndromes. Nat Genet. 2011, 44: 53-57.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Lasho TL, Finke CM, Hanson CA, Jimma T, Knudson RA, Ketterling RP, Pardanani A, Tefferi A: SF3B1 mutations in primary myelofibrosis: clinical, histopathology and genetic correlates among 155 patients. Leukemia. 2011, 26: 1135-1137.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Makishima H, Visconte V, Sakaguchi H, Jankowska AM, Abu KS, Jerez A, Przychodzen B, Bupathi M, Guinta K, Afable MG, Sekeres MA, Padgett RA, Tiu RV, Maciejewski JP: Mutations in the spliceosome machinery, a novel and ubiquitous pathway in leukemogenesis. Blood. 2012, 119: 3203-3210.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Thol F, Kade S, Schlarmann C, Loffeld P, Morgan M, Krauter J, Wlodarski MW, Kolking B, Wichmann M, Gorlich K, Gohring G, Bug G, Ottmann O, Niemeyer CM, Hofmann WK, Schlegelberger B, Ganser A, Heuser M: Frequency and prognostic impact of mutations in SRSF2, U2AF1, and ZRSR2 in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood. 2012, 119: 3578-3584.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jankowska AM, Szpurka H: Mutational determinants of epigenetic instability in myeloid malignancies. Semin Oncol. 2012, 39: 80-96.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Haferlach C, Grossmann V, Kohlmann A, Schindela S, Kern W, Schnittger S, Haferlach T: Deletion of the tumor-suppressor gene NF1 occurs in 5 % of myeloid malignancies and is accompanied by a mutation in the remaining allele in half of the cases. Leukemia. 2011, 26: 834-839.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Parkin B, Ouillette P, Wang Y, Liu Y, Wright W, Roulston D, Purkayastha A, Dressel A, Karp J, Bockenstedt P, Al-Zoubi A, Talpaz M, Kujawski L, Liu Y, Shedden K, Shakhan S, Li C, Erba H, Malek SN: NF1 inactivation in adult acute myelogenous leukemia. Clin Cancer Res. 2010, 16: 4135-4147.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Gelsi-Boyer V, Trouplin V, Adélaide J, Aceto N, Remy V, Pinson S, Houdayer C, Arnoulet C, Sainty D, Bentires-Alj M, Olschwang S, Vey N, Mozziconacci MJ, Birnbaum D, Chaffanet M: Genome profiling of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia: frequent alterations of RAS and RUNX1 genes. BMC Cancer. 2008, 8: 299-314.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Greif PA, Eck SH, Konstandin NP, Benet-Pages A, Ksienzyk B, Dufour A, Vetter AT, Popp HD, Lorenz-Depiereux B, Meitinger T, Bohlander SK, Strom TM: Identification of recurring tumor-specific somatic mutations in acute myeloid leukemia by transcriptome sequencing. Leukemia. 2011, 25: 821-827.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Adélaide J, Gelsi-Boyer V, Rocquain J, Carbuccia N, Birnbaum DJ, Finetti P, Bertucci F, Mozziconacci MJ, Vey N, Birnbaum D, Chaffanet M: Gain of CBL-interacting protein, a possible alternative to CBL mutations in myeloid malignancies. Leukemia. 2010, 24: 1539-1541.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Grand FH, Hidalgo-Curtis CE, Ernst T, Zoi K, Zoi C, McGuire C, Kreil S, Jones A, Score J, Metzgeroth G, Oscier D, Hall A, Brandts C, Serve H, Reiter A, Chase AJ, Cross NC: Frequent CBL mutations associated with 11q acquired uniparental disomy in myeloproliferative neoplasms. Blood. 2009, 113: 6182-6192.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Makishima H, Cazzolli H, Szpurka H, Dunbar A, Tiu R, Huh J, Muramatsu H, O'Keefe C, Hsi E, Paquette RL, Kojima S, List AF, Sekeres MA, McDevitt MA, Maciejewski JP: Mutations of e3 ubiquitin ligase cbl family members constitute a novel common pathogenic lesion in myeloid malignancies. J Clin Oncol. 2009, 27: 6109-6116.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Score J, Hidalgo-Curtis C, Jones AV, Winkelmann N, Skinner A, Ward D, Zoi K, Ernst T, Stegelmann F, Dohner K, Chase A, Cross NC: Inactivation of polycomb repressive complex 2 components in myeloproliferative and myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms. Blood. 2011, 119: 1208-1213.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Haferlach C, Bacher U, Schnittger S, Alpermann T, Zenger M, Kern W, Haferlach T: ETV6 rearrangements are recurrent in myeloid malignancies and are frequently associated with other genetic events. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2012, 51: 328-337.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cechova H, Lassuthova P, Novakova L, Belickova M, Stemberkova R, Jencik J, Stankova M, Hrabakova P, Pegova K, Zizkova H, Cermak J: Monitoring of methylation changes in 9p21 region in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myeloid leukemia. Neoplasma. 2012, 59: 168-174.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Aucagne R, Droin N, Paggetti J, Lagrange B, Largeot A, Hammann A, Bataille A, Martin L, Yan KP, Fenaux P, Losson R, Solary E, Bastie JN, Delva L: Transcription intermediary factor 1gamma is a tumor suppressor in mouse and human chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. J Clin Invest. 2011, 121: 2361-2370.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Liu TX, Becker MW, Jelinek J, Wu WS, Deng M, Mikhalkevich N, Hsu K, Bloomfield CD, Stone RM, DeAngelo DJ, Galinsky IA, Issa JP, Clarke MF, Look AT: Chromosome 5q deletion and epigenetic suppression of the gene encoding alpha-catenin (CTNNA1) in myeloid cell transformation. Nat Med. 2007, 13: 78-83.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brakensiek K, Langer F, Schlegelberger B, Kreipe H, Lehmann U: Hypermethylation of the suppressor of cytokine signalling-1 (SOCS-1) in myelodysplastic syndrome. Br J Haematol. 2005, 130: 209-217.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- McDevitt MA: Clinical applications of epigenetic markers and epigenetic profiling in myeloid malignancies. Semin Oncol. 2012, 39: 109-122.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bejar R, Stevenson K, Abdel-Wahab O, Galili N, Nilsson B, Garcia-Manero G, Kantarjian H, Raza A, Levine RL, Neuberg D, Ebert BL: Clinical effect of point mutations in myelodysplastic syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2011, 364: 2496-2506.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Ley TJ, Mardis ER, Ding L, Fulton B, McLellan MD, Chen K, Dooling D, Dunford-Shore BH, McGrath S, Hickenbotham M, Cook L, Abbott R, Larson DE, Koboldt DC, Pohl C, Smith S, Hawkins A, Abbott S, Locke D, Hillier LW, Miner T, Fulton L, Magrini V, Wylie T, Glasscock J, Conyers J, Sander N, Shi X, Osborne JR, Minx P, Gordon D, Chinwalla A, Zhao Y, Ries RE, Payton JE, Westervelt P, Tomasson MH, Watson M, Baty J, Ivanovich J, Heath S, Shannon WD, Nagarajan R, Walter MJ, Link DC, Graubert TA, DiPersio JF, Wilson RK: DNA sequencing of a cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukaemia genome. Nature. 2008, 456: 66-72.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Klampfl T, Harutyunyan A, Berg T, Gisslinger B, Schalling M, Bagienski K, Olcaydu D, Passamonti F, Rumi E, Pietra D, Jager R, Pieri L, Guglielmelli P, Iacobucci I, Martinelli G, Cazzola M, Vannucchi AM, Gisslinger H, Kralovics R: Genome integrity of myeloproliferative neoplasms in chronic phase and during disease progression. Blood. 2011, 118: 167-176.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Van Vlierberghe P, Patel J, Abdel-Wahab O, Lobry C, Hedvat CV, Balbin M, Nicolas C, Payer AR, Fernandez HF, Tallman MS, Paietta E, Melnick A, Vandenberghe P, Speleman F, Aifantis I, Cools J, Levine R, Ferrando A: PHF6 mutations in adult acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia. 2011, 25: 130-134.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Damm F, Bunke T, Thol F, Markus B, Wagner K, Gohring G, Schlegelberger B, Heil G, Reuter CW, Pullmann K, Schlenk RF, Dohner K, Heuser M, Krauter J, Dohner H, Ganser A, Morgan MA: Prognostic implications and molecular associations of NADH dehydrogenase subunit 4 (ND4) mutations in acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia. 2012, 26: 289-295.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rocquain J, Gelsi-Boyer V, Adélaide J, Murati A, Carbuccia N, Vey N, Birnbaum D, Mozziconacci MJ, Chaffanet M: Alteration of cohesin genes in myeloid diseases. Am J Hematol. 2010, 85: 717-719.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cheung N, So CW: Transcriptional and epigenetic networks in haematological malignancy. FEBS Lett. 2011, 585: 2100-2111.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Peters AH, Schwaller J: Epigenetic mechanisms in acute myeloid leukemia. Prog Drug Res. 2011, 67: 197-219.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dalgliesh GL, Furge K, Greenman C, Chen L, Bignell G, Butler A, Davies H, Edkins S, Hardy C, Latimer C, Teague J, Andrews J, Barthorpe S, Beare D, Buck G, Campbell PJ, Forbes S, Jia M, Jones D, Knott H, Kok CY, Lau KW, Leroy C, Lin ML, McBride DJ, Maddison M, Maguire S, McLay K, Menzies A, Mironenko T, Mulderrig L, Mudie L, O'Meara S, Pleasance E, Rajasingham A, Shepherd R, Smith R, Stebbings L, Stephens P, Tang G, Tarpey PS, Turrell K, Dykema KJ, Khoo SK, Petillo D, Wondergem B, Anema J, Kahnoski RJ, Teh BT, Stratton MR, Futreal PA: Systematic sequencing of renal carcinoma reveals inactivation of histone modifying genes. Nature. 2010, 463: 360-363.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Varela I, Tarpey P, Raine K, Huang D, Ong CK, Stephens P, Davies H, Jones D, Lin ML, Teague J, Bignell G, Butler A, Cho J, Dalgliesh GL, Galappaththige D, Greenman C, Hardy C, Jia M, Latimer C, Lau KW, Marshall J, McLaren S, Menzies A, Mudie L, Stebbings L, Largaespada DA, Wessels LF, Richard S, Kahnoski RJ, Anema J, Tuveson DA, Perez-Mancera PA, Mustonen V, Fischer A, Adams DJ, Rust A, Chan-on W, Subimerb C, Dykema K, Furge K, Campbell PJ, Teh BT, Stratton MR, Futreal PA: Exome sequencing identifies frequent mutation of the SWI/SNF complex gene PBRM1 in renal carcinoma. Nature. 2011, 469: 539-542.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Figueroa ME, Abdel-Wahab O, Lu C, Ward PS, Patel J, Shih A, Li Y, Bhagwat N, Vasanthakumar A, Fernandez HF, Tallman MS, Sun Z, Wolniak K, Peeters JK, Liu W, Choe SE, Fantin VR, Paietta E, Lowenberg B, Licht JD, Godley LA, Delwel R, Valk PJ, Thompson CB, Levine RL, Melnick A: Leukemic IDH1 and IDH2 mutations result in a hypermethylation phenotype, disrupt TET2 function, and impair hematopoietic differentiation. Cancer Cell. 2010, 18: 553-567.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Dang L, White DW, Gross S, Bennett BD, Bittinger MA, Driggers EM, Fantin VR, Jang HG, Jin S, Keenan MC, Marks KM, Prins RM, Ward PS, Yen KE, Liau LM, Rabinowitz JD, Cantley LC, Thompson CB: Vander Heiden MG, Su SM: Cancer-associated IDH1 mutations produce 2-hydroxyglutarate. Nature. 2010, 465: 966-PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Ward PS, Patel J, Wise DR, Abdel-Wahab O, Bennett BD, Coller HA, Cross JR, Fantin VR, Hedvat CV, Perl AE, Rabinowitz JD, Carroll M, Su SM, Sharp KA, Levine RL, Thompson CB: The common feature of leukemia-associated IDH1 and IDH2 mutations is a neomorphic enzyme activity converting alpha-ketoglutarate to 2-hydroxyglutarate. Cancer Cell. 2010, 17: 225-234.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Tahiliani M, Koh KP, Shen Y, Pastor WA, Bandukwala H, Brudno Y, Agarwal S, Iyer LM, Liu DR, Aravind L, Rao A: Conversion of 5-methylcytosine to 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in mammalian DNA by MLL partner TET1. Science. 2009, 324: 930-935.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Cimmino L, Abdel-Wahab O, Levine RL, Aifantis I: TET family proteins and their role in stem cell differentiation and transformation. Cell Stem Cell. 2011, 9: 193-204.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Ito S, Shen L, Dai Q, Wu SC, Collins LB, Swenberg JA, He C, Zhang Y: Tet Proteins Can Convert 5-Methylcytosine to 5-Formylcytosine and 5-Carboxylcytosine. Science. 2011, 233: 1300-1303.Google Scholar
- Williams K, Christensen J, Pedersen MT, Johansen JV, Cloos PA, Rappsilber J, Helin K: TET1 and hydroxymethylcytosine in transcription and DNA methylation fidelity. Nature. 2011, 473: 343-348.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Tsukada Y, Fang J, Erdjument-Bromage H, Warren ME, Borchers CH, Tempst P, Zhang Y: Histone demethylation by a family of JmjC domain-containing proteins. Nature. 2006, 439: 811-816.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Moran-Crusio K, Reavie L, Shih A, Abdel-Wahab O, Ndiaye-Lobry D, Lobry C, Figueroa ME, Vasanthakumar A, Patel J, Zhao X, Perna F, Pandey S, Madzo J, Song C, Dai Q, He C, Ibrahim S, Beran M, Zavadil J, Nimer SD, Melnick A, Godley LA, Aifantis I, Levine RL: Tet2 loss leads to increased hematopoietic stem cell self-renewal and myeloid transformation. Cancer Cell. 2011, 20: 11-24.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Quivoron C, Couronne L, Della VV, Lopez CK, Plo I, Wagner-Ballon O, Do CM, Delhommeau F, Arnulf B, Stern MH, Godley L, Opolon P, Tilly H, Solary E, Duffourd Y, Dessen P, Merle-Beral H, Nguyen-Khac F, Fontenay M, Vainchenker W, Bastard C, Mercher T, Bernard OA: TET2 Inactivation Results in Pleiotropic Hematopoietic Abnormalities in Mouse and Is a Recurrent Event during Human Lymphomagenesis. Cancer Cell. 2011, 20: 25-38.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vire E, Brenner C, Deplus R, Blanchon L, Fraga M, Didelot C, Morey L, Van EA, Bernard D, Vanderwinden JM, Bollen M, Esteller M, Di CL: de LY, Fuks F: The Polycomb group protein EZH2 directly controls DNA methylation. Nature. 2006, 439: 871-874.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Challen GA, Sun D, Jeong M, Luo M, Jelinek J, Berg JS, Bock C, Vasanthakumar A, Gu H, Xi Y, Liang S, Lu Y, Darlington GJ, Meissner A, Issa JP, Godley LA, Li W, Goodell MA: Dnmt3a is essential for hematopoietic stem cell differentiation. Nat Genet. 2012, 44: 23-31.Google Scholar
- Ficz G, Branco MR, Seisenberger S, Santos F, Krueger F, Hore TA, Marques CJ, Andrews S, Reik W: Dynamic regulation of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in mouse ES cells and during differentiation. Nature. 2011, 473: 398-402.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wu H, D'Alessio AC, Ito S, Xia K, Wang Z, Cui K, Zhao K, Sun YE, Zhang Y: Dual functions of Tet1 in transcriptional regulation in mouse embryonic stem cells. Nature. 2011, 473: 389-393.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Li T, Hu JF, Qiu X, Ling J, Chen H, Wang S, Hou A, Vu TH, Hoffman AR: CTCF regulates allelic expression of Igf2 by orchestrating a promoter-polycomb repressive complex 2 intrachromosomal loop. Mol Cell Biol. 2008, 28: 6473-6482.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Abdel-Wahab O, Adli M, Saunders L, Gao J, Shih A, Pandey S, Jaffe J, Zhao X, Perna F, Caroll M, Melnick A, Nimer SD, Aifantis I, Bernstein B, Levine R: ASXL1 Mutations Promote Myeloid Transformation Through Inhibition of PRC2-Mediated Gene Repression. ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts. 2011, 118: 405-Google Scholar
- Beisel C, Paro R: Silencing chromatin: comparing modes and mechanisms. Nat Rev Genet. 2011, 12: 123-135.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ntziachristos P, Tsirigos A, Vlierberghe PV, Nedjic J, Trimarchi T, Flaherty MS, Ferres-Marco D: da RV, Tang Z, Siegle J, Asp P, Hadler M, Rigo I, Keersmaecker KD, Patel J, Huynh T, Utro F, Poglio S, Samon JB, Paietta E, Racevskis J, Rowe JM, Rabadan R, Levine RL, Brown S, Pflumio F, Dominguez M, Ferrando A, Aifantis I: Genetic inactivation of the polycomb repressive complex 2 in T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Nat Med. 2012, 18: 298-303.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Oguro H, Yuan J, Tanaka S, Miyagi S, Mochizuki-Kashio M, Ichikawa H, Yamazaki S, Koseki H, Nakauchi H, Iwama A: Lethal myelofibrosis induced by Bmi1-deficient hematopoietic cells unveils a tumor suppressor function of the polycomb group genes. J Exp Med. 2012, 209: 445-454.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Brecqueville M, Adélaide J, Bertucci F, Finetti P, Chaffanet M, Birnbaum D, Murati A: Alterations of polycomb gene BMI1 in human myeloproliferative neoplasms. Cell Cycle. 2012, in press: in press-in pressGoogle Scholar
- Simon JA, Kingston RE: Mechanisms of polycomb gene silencing: knowns and unknowns. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2009, 10: 697-708.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jiao Y, Shi C, Edil BH, de Wilde RF, Klimstra DS, Maitra A, Schulick RD, Tang LH, Wolfgang CL, Choti MA, Velculescu VE, Diaz LA: Vogelstein B, Kinzler KW, Hruban RH, Papadopoulos N: DAXX/ATRX, MEN1, and mTOR pathway genes are frequently altered in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Science. 2011, 331: 1199-1203.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Schwartzentruber J, Korshunov A, Liu XY, Jones DT, Pfaff E, Jacob K, Sturm D, Fontebasso AM, Quang DA, Tonjes M, Hovestadt V, Albrecht S, Kool M, Nantel A, Konermann C, Lindroth A, Jager N, Rausch T, Ryzhova M, Korbel JO, Hielscher T, Hauser P, Garami M, Klekner A, Bognar L, Ebinger M, Schuhmann MU, Scheurlen W, Pekrun A, Fruhwald MC, Roggendorf W, Kramm C, Durken M, Atkinson J, Lepage P, Montpetit A, Zakrzewska M, Zakrzewski K, Liberski PP, Dong Z, Siegel P, Kulozik AE, Zapatka M, Guha A, Malkin D, Felsberg J, Reifenberger G: von DA, Ichimura K, Collins VP, Witt H, Milde T, Witt O, Zhang C, Castelo-Branco P, Lichter P, Faury D, Tabori U, Plass C, Majewski J, Pfister SM, Jabado N: Driver mutations in histone H3.3 and chromatin remodelling genes in paediatric glioblastoma. Nature. 2012, 482: 226-231.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Berger AH, Pandolfi PP: Haplo-insufficiency: a driving force in cancer. J Pathol. 2011, 223: 137-146.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Acquaviva C, Gelsi-Boyer V, Birnbaum D: Myelodysplastic syndromes: lost between two states?. Leukemia. 2010, 24: 1-5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Isono K, Mizutani-Koseki Y, Komori T, Schmidt-Zachmann MS, Koseki H: Mammalian polycomb-mediated repression of Hox genes requires the essential spliceosomal protein Sf3b1. Genes Dev. 2005, 19: 536-541.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Luco RF, Pan Q, Tominaga K, Blencowe BJ, Pereira-Smith OM, Misteli T: Regulation of alternative splicing by histone modifications. Science. 2010, 327: 996-1000.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Kralovics R: Genetic complexity of myeloproliferative neoplasms. Leukemia. 2008, 22: 1841-1848.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pardanani A, Lasho T, Finke C, Oh ST, Gotlib J, Tefferi A: LNK mutation studies in blast-phase myeloproliferative neoplasms, and in chronic-phase disease with TET2, IDH, JAK2 or MPL mutations. Leukemia. 2010, 24: 1713-1718.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pardanani AD, Levine RL, Lasho T, Pikman Y, Mesa RA, Wadleigh M, Steensma DP, Elliott MA, Wolanskyj AP, Hogan WJ, McClure RF, Litzow MR, Gilliland DG, Tefferi A: MPL515 mutations in myeloproliferative and other myeloid disorders: a study of 1182 patients. Blood. 2006, 108: 3472-3476.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Abbas S, Rotmans G, Lowenberg B, Valk PJ: Exon 8 splice site mutations in the gene encoding the E3-ligase CBL are associated with core binding factor acute myeloid leukemias. Haematologica. 2008, 93: 1595-1597.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Carbuccia N, Trouplin V, Gelsi-Boyer V, Murati A, Rocquain J, Adélaide J, Olschwang S, Xerri L, Vey N, Chaffanet M, Birnbaum D, Mozziconacci MJ: Mutual exclusion of ASXL1 and NPM1 mutations in a series of acute myeloid leukemias. Leukemia. 2010, 24: 469-473.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rocquain J, Carbuccia N, Trouplin V, Raynaud S, Murati A, Nezri M, Tadrist Z, Olschwang S, Vey N, Birnbaum D, Gelsi-Boyer V, Mozziconacci MJ: Combined mutations of ASXL1, CBL, FLT3, IDH1, IDH2, JAK2, KRAS, NPM1, NRAS, RUNX1, TET2 and WT1 genes in myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myeloid leukemias. BMC Cancer. 2010, 10: 401-405.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Shen Y, Zhu YM, Fan X, Shi JY, Wang QR, Yan XJ, Gu ZH, Wang YY, Chen B, Jiang CL, Yan H, Chen FF, Chen HM, Chen Z, Jin J, Chen SJ: Gene mutation patterns and their prognostic impact in a cohort of 1,185 patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2011, 118: 5593-5603.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bernard F, Gelsi-Boyer V, Murati A, Giraudier S, Trouplin V, Adélaide J, Rey J, Olschwang S, Vainchenker W, Chaffanet M, Vey N, Mozziconacci MJ, Birnbaum D: Alterations of NFIA in chronic malignant myeloid diseases. Leukemia. 2009, 23: 583-585.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Damm F, Fontenay M, Bernard OA: Point mutations in myelodysplastic syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2011, 365: 1154-1155.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fortier JM, Graubert TA: Murine models of human acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer Treat Res. 2010, 145: 183-196.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- McCormack E, Bruserud O, Gjertsen BT: Animal models of acute myelogenous leukaemia - development, application and future perspectives. Leukemia. 2005, 19: 687-706.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pronier E, Quivoron C, Bernard OA, Villeval JL: JAK2V(1)F/TET2 mutations: does the order matter?. Haematologica. 2011, 96: 638-640.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Walter MJ, Shen D, Ding L, Shao J, Koboldt DC, Chen K, Larson DE, McLellan MD, Dooling D, Abbott R, Fulton R, Magrini V, Schmidt H, Kalicki-Veizer J, O'Laughlin M, Fan X, Grillot M, Witowski S, Heath S, Frater JL, Eades W, Tomasson M, Westervelt P, DiPersio JF, Link DC, Mardis ER, Ley TJ, Wilson RK, Graubert TA: Clonal architecture of secondary acute myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2012, 366: 1090-1098.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Passegue E, Jamieson CH, Ailles LE, Weissman IL: Normal and leukemic hematopoiesis: are leukemias a stem cell disorder or a reacquisition of stem cell characteristics?. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003, 100 (Suppl 1): 11842-11849.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Lambert JR, Everington T, Linch DC, Gale RE: In essential thrombocythemia, multiple JAK2-V617F clones are present in most mutant-positive patients: a new disease paradigm. Blood. 2009, 114: 3018-3023.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gilliland DG: Molecular genetics of human leukemias: new insights into therapy. Semin Hematol. 2002, 39: 6-11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dawson MA, Bannister AJ, Gottgens B, Foster SD, Bartke T, Green AR, Kouzarides T: JAK2 phosphorylates histone H3Y41 and excludes HP1alpha from chromatin. Nature. 2009, 461: 819-822.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Bejar R, Levine R, Ebert BL: Unraveling the molecular pathophysiology of myelodysplastic syndromes. J Clin Oncol. 2011, 29: 504-515.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Makishima H, Jankowska AM, McDevitt MA, O'Keefe C, Dujardin S, Cazzolli H, Przychodzen B, Prince C, Nicoll J, Siddaiah H, Shaik M, Szpurka H, Hsi E, Advani A, Paquette R, Maciejewski JP: CBL, CBLB, TET2, ASXL1, and IDH1/2 mutations and additional chromosomal aberrations constitute molecular events in chronic myelogenous leukemia. Blood. 2011, 117: e198-e206.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Roche-Lestienne C, Marceau A, Labis E, Nibourel O, Coiteux V, Guilhot J, Legros L, Nicolini F, Rousselot P, Gardembas M, Helevaut N, Frimat C, Mahon FX, Guilhot F, Preudhomme C: Mutation analysis of TET2, IDH1, IDH2 and ASXL1 in chronic myeloid leukemia. Leukemia. 2011, 25: 1661-1664.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Haferlach T, Kohlmann A, Wieczorek L, Basso G, Kronnie GT, Bene MC, De VJ, Hernandez JM, Hofmann WK, Mills KI, Gilkes A, Chiaretti S, Shurtleff SA, Kipps TJ, Rassenti LZ, Yeoh AE, Papenhausen PR, Liu WM, Williams PM, Foa R: Clinical utility of microarray-based gene expression profiling in the diagnosis and subclassification of leukemia: report from the International Microarray Innovations in Leukemia Study Group. J Clin Oncol. 2010, 28: 2529-2537.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vey N, Mozziconacci MJ, Groulet-Martinec A, Debono S, Finetti P, Carbuccia N, Beillard E, Devilard E, Arnoulet C, Coso D, Sainty D, Xerri L, Stoppa AM, Lafage-Pochitaloff M, Nguyen C, Houlgatte R, Blaise D, Maraninchi D, Birg F, Birnbaum D, Bertucci F: Identification of new classes among acute myelogenous leukaemias with normal karyotype using gene expression profiling. Oncogene. 2004, 23: 9381-9391.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Figueroa ME, Lugthart S, Li Y, Erpelinck-Verschueren C, Deng X, Christos PJ, Schifano E, Booth J: van PW, Skrabanek L, Campagne F, Mazumdar M, Greally JM, Valk PJ, Lowenberg B, Delwel R, Melnick A: DNA methylation signatures identify biologically distinct subtypes in acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer Cell. 2010, 17: 13-27.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Boultwood J, Perry J, Zaman R, Fernandez-Santamaria C, Littlewood T, Kusec R, Pellagatti A, Wang L, Clark RE, Wainscoat JS: High-density single nucleotide polymorphism array analysis and ASXL1 gene mutation screening in chronic myeloid leukemia during disease progression. Leukemia. 2010, 24: 1139-1145.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chou WC, Huang HH, Hou HA, Chen CY, Tang JL, Yao M, Tsay W, Ko BS, Wu SJ, Huang SY, Hsu SC, Chen YC, Huang YN, Chang YC, Lee FY, Liu MC, Liu CW, Tseng MH, Huang CF, Tien HF: Distinct clinical and biological features of de novo acute myeloid leukemia with additional sex comb-like 1 (ASXL1) mutations. Blood. 2010, 116: 4086-4094.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Thol F, Friesen I, Damm F, Yun H, Weissinger EM, Krauter J, Wagner K, Chaturvedi A, Sharma A, Wichmann M, Gohring G, Schumann C, Bug G, Ottmann O, Hofmann WK, Schlegelberger B, Heuser M, Ganser A: Prognostic Significance of ASXL1 Mutations in Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndromes. J Clin Oncol. 2011, 29: 2499-2506.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stein BL, Williams DM, O'Keefe C, Rogers O, Ingersoll RG, Spivak JL, Verma A, Maciejewski JP, McDevitt MA, Moliterno AR: Disruption of the ASXL1 gene is frequent in primary, post-essential thrombocytosis and post-polycythemia vera myelofibrosis, but not essential thrombocytosis or polycythemia vera: analysis of molecular genetics and clinical phenotypes. Haematologica. 2011, 96: 1462-1469.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Kosmider O, Gelsi-Boyer V, Cheok M, Grabar S, Della-Valle V, Picard F, Viguie F, Quesnel B, Beyne-Rauzy O, Solary E, Vey N, Hunault-Berger M, Fenaux P, Mansat-De MV, Delabesse E, Guardiola P, Lacombe C, Vainchenker W, Preudhomme C, Dreyfus F, Bernard OA, Birnbaum D, Fontenay M: TET2 mutation is an independent favorable prognostic factor in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs). Blood. 2009, 114: 3285-3291.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Metzeler KH, Maharry K, Radmacher MD, Mrozek K, Margeson D, Becker H, Curfman J, Holland KB, Schwind S, Whitman SP, Wu YZ, Blum W, Powell BL, Carter TH, Wetzler M, Moore JO, Kolitz JE, Baer MR, Carroll AJ, Larson RA, Caligiuri MA, Marcucci G, Bloomfield CD: TET2 mutations improve the new European LeukemiaNet risk classification of acute myeloid leukemia: a Cancer and Leukemia Group B study. J Clin Oncol. 2011, 29: 1373-1381.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Nibourel O, Kosmider O, Cheok M, Boissel N, Renneville A, Philippe N, Dombret H, Dreyfus F, Quesnel B, Geffroy S, Quentin S, Roche-Lestienne C, Cayuela JM, Roumier C, Fenaux P, Vainchenker W, Bernard OA, Soulier J, Fontenay M, Preudhomme C: Incidence and prognostic value of TET2 alterations in de novo acute myeloid leukemia achieving complete remission. Blood. 2010, 116: 1132-1135.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Patel JP, Gonen M, Figueroa ME, Fernandez H, Sun Z, Racevskis J, Van VP, Dolgalev I, Thomas S, Aminova O, Huberman K, Cheng J, Viale A, Socci ND, Heguy A, Cherry A, Vance G, Higgins RR, Ketterling RP, Gallagher RE, Litzow M, van den Brink MR, Lazarus HM, Rowe JM, Luger S, Ferrando A, Paietta E, Tallman MS, Melnick A, Abdel-Wahab O, Levine RL: Prognostic relevance of integrated genetic profiling in acute myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2012, 366: 1079-1089.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Harrison C, Kiladjian JJ, Al-Ali HK, Gisslinger H, Waltzman R, Stalbovskaya V, McQuitty M, Hunter DS, Levy R, Knoops L, Cervantes F, Vannucchi AM, Barbui T, Barosi G: JAK inhibition with ruxolitinib versus best available therapy for myelofibrosis. N Engl J Med. 2012, 366: 787-798.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pardanani A, Tefferi A: Targeting myeloproliferative neoplasms with JAK inhibitors. Curr Opin Hematol. 2011, 18: 105-110.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Verstovsek S, Mesa RA, Gotlib J, Levy RS, Gupta V, DiPersio JF, Catalano JV, Deininger M, Miller C, Silver RT, Talpaz M, Winton EF, Harvey JH: Arcasoy MO, Hexner E, Lyons RM, Paquette R, Raza A, Vaddi K, Erickson-Viitanen S, Koumenis IL, Sun W, Sandor V, Kantarjian HM: A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of ruxolitinib for myelofibrosis. N Engl J Med. 2012, 366: 799-807.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Wang L, Gural A, Sun XJ, Zhao X, Perna F, Huang G, Hatlen MA, Vu L, Liu F, Xu H, Asai T, Xu H, Deblasio T, Menendez S, Voza F, Jiang Y, Cole PA, Zhang J, Melnick A, Roeder RG, Nimer SD: The Leukemogenicity of AML1-ETO Is Dependent on Site-Specific Lysine Acetylation. Science. 2011, 333: 765-769.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Itzykson R, Kosmider O, Cluzeau T, Mansat-De MV, Dreyfus F, Beyne-Rauzy O, Quesnel B, Vey N, Gelsi-Boyer V, Raynaud S, Preudhomme C, Ades L, Fenaux P, Fontenay M: Impact of TET2 mutations on response rate to azacitidine in myelodysplastic syndromes and low blast count acute myeloid leukemias. Leukemia. 2011, 25: 1147-1152.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pollyea DA, Raval A, Kusler B, Gotlib JR, Alizadeh AA, Mitchell BS: Impact of TET2 mutations on mRNA expression and clinical outcomes in MDS patients treated with DNA methyltransferase inhibitors. Hematol Oncol. 2010, 29: 157-160.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yokoi A, Kotake Y, Takahashi K, Kadowaki T, Matsumoto Y, Minoshima Y, Sugi NH, Sagane K, Hamaguchi M, Iwata M, Mizui Y: Biological validation that SF3b is a target of the antitumor macrolide pladienolide. FEBS J. 2011, 278: 4870-4880.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Amson R, Pece S, Lespagnol A, Vyas R, Mazzarol G, Tosoni D, Colaluca I, Viale G, Rodrigues-Ferreira S, Wynendaele J, Chaloin O, Hoebeke J, Marine JC, Di Fiore PP, Telerman A: Reciprocal repression between P53 and TCTP. Nat Med. 2012, 18: 91-99.Google Scholar
- Bykov VJ, Issaeva N, Shilov A, Hultcrantz M, Pugacheva E, Chumakov P, Bergman J, Wiman KG, Selivanova G: Restoration of the tumor suppressor function to mutant p53 by a low-molecular-weight compound. Nat Med. 2002, 8: 282-288.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Roychowdhury S, Talpaz M: Managing resistance in chronic myeloid leukemia. Blood Rev. 2011, 25: 279-290.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chan DA, Giaccia AJ: Harnessing synthetic lethal interactions in anticancer drug discovery. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2011, 10: 351-364.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Eisinger F, Sobol H, Birnbaum D: Hypothesis: more mutations to cure cancer?. Oncol Rep. 1999, 6: 1189-1190.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/12/304/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.