Has the time to come leave the “watch-and-wait” strategy in newly diagnosed asymptomatic follicular lymphoma patients?
© Rueda et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 5 December 2011
Accepted: 14 May 2012
Published: 31 May 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|5 Dec 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|8 Mar 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Thomas Witzig|
|26 Mar 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Armando López-Guillermo|
|15 Apr 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Elisabeth Pérez-Ruiz|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|15 Apr 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|24 Apr 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Thomas Witzig|
|25 Apr 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Armando López-Guillermo|
|4 May 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Elisabeth Pérez-Ruiz|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|4 May 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|14 May 2012||Editorially accepted|
|31 May 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-2407-12-210|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.