Measuring the quality of MDT working: an observational approach
© Taylor et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 27 October 2011
Accepted: 29 May 2012
Published: 29 May 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|27 Oct 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|28 Jan 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Josep Borras|
|2 Feb 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - christobel saunders|
|8 Feb 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Linda Mileshkin|
|14 Feb 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Frances Wright|
|24 Mar 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Cath Taylor|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|24 Mar 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|13 Apr 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Josep Borras|
|14 Apr 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Frances Wright|
|18 Apr 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - christobel saunders|
|19 Apr 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Linda Mileshkin|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|29 May 2012||Editorially accepted|
|29 May 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-2407-12-202|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.