Prognostic impact of mRNA levels of osteopontin splice variants in soft tissue sarcoma patients
- Antje Hahnel†1Email author,
- Henri Wichmann†1,
- Thomas Greither2,
- Matthias Kappler3,
- Peter Würl4,
- Matthias Kotzsch5,
- Helge Taubert3, 6, 7,
- Dirk Vordermark1 and
- Matthias Bache1
© Hahnel et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 19 December 2011
Accepted: 2 April 2012
Published: 2 April 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|19 Dec 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|3 Jan 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Franz Rödel|
|23 Jan 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - mariaserena benassi|
|9 Mar 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Antje Guettler|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|9 Mar 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|21 Mar 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - mariaserena benassi|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|2 Apr 2012||Editorially accepted|
|2 Apr 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-2407-12-131|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.