Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Expression of the phosphorylated MEK5 protein is associated with TNM staging of colorectal cancer

  • Bang Hu1,
  • Donglin Ren1,
  • Dan Su1,
  • Hongcheng Lin1,
  • Zhenyu Xian1,
  • Xingyang Wan1,
  • Junxiao Zhang1,
  • Xinhui Fu1,
  • Li Jiang2,
  • Dechan Diao3,
  • Xinjuan Fan1,
  • Lei Wang1Email author and
  • Jianping Wang1Email author
Contributed equally
BMC Cancer201212:127

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-12-127

Received: 5 December 2011

Accepted: 30 March 2012

Published: 30 March 2012

Abstract

Background

Activation of MEK5 in many cancers is associated with carcinogenesis through aberrant cell proliferation. In this study, we determined the level of phosphorylated MEK5 (pMEK5) expression in human colorectal cancer (CRC) tissues and correlated it with clinicopathologic data.

Methods

pMEK5 expression was examined by immunohistochemistry in a tissue microarray (TMA) containing 335 clinicopathologic characterized CRC cases and 80 cases of nontumor colorectal tissues. pMEK5 expression of 19 cases of primary CRC lesions and paired with normal mucosa was examined by Western blotting. The relationship between pMEK5 expression in CRC and clinicopathologic parameters, and the association of pMEK5 expression with CRC survival were analyzed respectively.

Results

pMEK5 expression was significantly higher in CRC tissues (185 out of 335, 55.2%) than in normal tissues (6 out of 80, 7.5%; P < 0.001). Western blotting demonstrated that pMEK5 expression was upregulated in 12 of 19 CRC tissues (62.1%) compared to the corresponding adjacent nontumor colorectal tissues. Overexpression of pMEK5 in CRC tissues was significantly correlated to the depth of invasion (P = 0.001), lymph node metastasis (P < 0.001), distant metastasis (P < 0.001) and high preoperative CEA level (P < 0.001). Consistently, the pMEK5 level in CRC tissues was increased following stage progression of the disease (P < 0.001). Analysis of the survival curves showed a significantly worse 5-year disease-free (P = 0.002) and 5-year overall survival rate (P < 0.001) for patients whose tumors overexpressed pMEK5. However, in multivariate analysis, pMEK5 was not an independent prognostic factor for CRC (DFS: P = 0.139; OS: P = 0.071).

Conclusions

pMEK5 expression is correlated with the staging of CRC and its expression might be helpful to the TNM staging system of CRC.

Background

CRC is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer in males and the second in females, with over 1.2 million new cancer cases and 608700 deaths estimated to have occurred in 2008 worldwide [1]. In China, CRC remains the fourth most common malignant tumor, the fifth leading cause of cancer-related death and the incidence continues to increase [2]. At current rates, approximately 5%-6% of individuals will develop cancer of the colon or rectum within their lifetime [3]. The survival of CRC patients is directly associated with the tumor stage at the time of diagnosis. Patients with distant metastasis have a poor 5-year survival (12%), while patients with a localized disease have good prognosis (90%) [4]. However, currently, few markers besides TNM stage have been validated as diagnosis criteria in the world wild. Molecules involved in CRC progression might allow more accurate diagnosis the stage of CRC, which would improve efficacy of multimodal therapy and sparing patients from unnecessary procedures [5].

Mitogen-activated protein kinase kinases (MEKs/MAPKKs) represent a family of protein kinases upstream of MAP kinases that play a critical role in regulating cell proliferation and apoptosis. Mitogen/extracellular signal regulated kinase kinase-5 (MEK5) encodes a 444-amino-acid protein with an overall 40% homology to the other MEK proteins [6, 7]. MEK5 is activated via the dual phosphorylation of its Serine 311 and Threonine 315 by MEKK2,3/Tpl2. Subsequently, activated MEK5 (pMEK5) specifically activates ERK5, and then the activated ERK5 phosphorylates substrates including MEF2, c-Fos, Fra 1, Sap-1, c-Myc and NF-κB, most of which are oncogene [8]. Currently, the MEK5 has been reported as an important protein for sustaining tumor growth, most likely due to its supportive role in vasculogenesis and blood vessel homeostasis [9, 10]. Moreover, MEK5 has been detected in several tumor cells or tissues, e.g. including prostate cancer [1115], breast cancer [1621], Hodgkin lymphoma [22, 23] and malignant mesotheliomas [24]. The expression of MEK5 is high in these cancers and is an indicator of poor prognosis and/or induction of metastasis. However, the prognostic power has typically been based on total MEK5 expression and does not consider pMEK5.

In the present study, we have examined the expression levels of pMEK5 in CRC tissues using immunohistochemistry and Western blot. We explored possible correlations between pMEK5 expression and tumor progression, to determine its role during tumor development.

Methods

Patients and tissue specimens

This study was approved by the Institute Research Medical Ethics Committee of Sun Yat-Sen University. Written informed consent for using tissue samples was obtained from all patients. For this study, we performed an immunohistochemical assay of 335 paraffin-embedded samples of CRC and 80 adjacent normal mucosa tissue samples collected from patients in the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery of the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University (Guangzhou, P. R. China), between January 2000 and November 2006. Only patients who did not receive preoperative anticancer treatment were enrolled. Colorectal tissues were surgically removed from CRC patient, normal colorectal mucosa was obtained from the distal edge of the resection at least 5 cm from the tumor. Histomorphology of all tumor specimens and adjacent normal mucosa were confirmed with hematoxylin-eosin (H&E) staining. In according with the International Union against Cancer TNM classification system, we divided all CRC specimens into four groups. Clinical parameters such as sex, age at surgery differentiation grade, lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis, TNM stage, preoperative CEA level and preoperative CA19-9 level were collected. All specimens were fixed in 10% formalin and embedded in paraffin. Enrolled patients were followed for at least 5 years for survival analysis. After a median follow-up of 62.4 months, 102 (30.4%) of all patients had died. In addition, for Western blot analysis, we randomly selected 19 paired samples of CRC and corresponding adjacent normal tissues from patents that underwent surgical tissue resection at the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University (Guangzhou, P. R. China) during 2011. Written informed consent was obtained from each patient before surgery. All excised samples were obtained within 1 h after the operation to remove tumor tissue, and were then immediately kept in liquid nitrogen until further analysis.

Tissue microarray and immunohistochemistry

After screening the H&E-stained slides for optimal tumor tissue and adjacent tissue at a distance of 5 cm from the tumor, we constructed TMA slides using the specimens from the 335 patients and the 80 specimens of primary CRC paired with normal mucosa in our Tissue Bank. For each specimen, two cores (1 mm diameter) were taken from histologically confirmed normal adjacent colorectal mucosa to construct the TMAs using Tissue Array (ALPHELYS, MINIPORE).

Immunohistochemistry was performed using the Envision System with diaminobenzidine (DAKO Cytomation, Glostrup, Denmark) according to the manufacture's protocol. In brief, antigen retrieval was performed with citrate buffer (pH 6.0) by heating in a microwave at a controlled final temperature of 121°C for 15 min. Sections were incubated overnight at 4°C with the primary antibody against pMEK5 (phosphor S311 + T315, Abcam, ab70608, diluted 1:800, HK, China), and then incubated with the secondary antibody (Envision System, Dako) for 30 min at room temperature. After rinsing with PBS three times each for 10 min, the sections were incubated with 3,3-diaminobenzidine (DAB) liquid for 1 min, counterstained with Mayer hematoxylin, dehydrated, and then mounted.

Staining evaluation

For pMEK5 staining, tissue specimens were examined separately by two independent and experienced pathologists (D. Su and X. J. Fan) under double-blinded conditions without prior clinicopathologic data. Expression of pMEK5 in CRC was evaluated by scanning the entire tissue specimen under low magnification (×40) and then confirmed by high magnification (×400). An immunoreactivity score (IRS) system was applied. The staining intensity for pMEK5 was scored as: 0, negative (colorless); 1, weak (pallide-flavens); 2, moderate (yellow), and 3 strong (brown). The proportion of stained cells was also recorded as: 0 (none); 1 (1-25%); 2 (26-50%); 3 (51-75%); or 4 (76-100%). The intensity and extent scores were summed to yield a composite score of 0 to 7 for each specimen[25]. Composite scores of 0-4 were defined as indicating normal pMEK5 protein expression, and scores of 5-7 were considered to indicate pMEK5 overexpression.

Western blot analysis

Nineteen pairs of randomly selected CRC patient tissue specimens and corresponding nontumor specimens were subjected to Western blot analysis. Total protein was extracted from frozen colorectal mucosa using the Whole Protein Extraction Kit (Fermentas, USA). Equal amounts of protein were separated by electrophoresis on a 12% SDS polyacrylamide gel and electrotransferred on a polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane (Pall, Port Washington, New York, USA). The membrane was blocked with 5% Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA) for 1 h. The tissues were incubated with primary rabbit polyclonal antibodies against human pMEK5 (1:1000 dilution; Abcam, HK, China). The immunoreactive signals were detected with an enhanced chemiluminescence kit (Amersham Biosciences, Uppsala, Sweden). The procedures were conducted in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. Levels of β-actin were used to normalize protein expression.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were carried out using the SPSS v.17.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL). The Chi-square and Fishers' exact tests (used when an expected value in one of the cells was less than 5) for proportionality were used to analyze the relationship between the expression of pMEK5 and the clinicopathologic variables. The survival rates were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and the differences between the survival curves were examined by the log-rank test. Univariate Cox proportional hazards regressions were applied to estimate the individual hazards ratio (HR) for the DFS and OS. The significant variables in the univariate analysis (P < 0.05) were then put into the multivariate analysis. The HR with 95% confidence interval was measured to estimate the hazard risk of individual factors. P values of less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

pMEK5 expression in CRC tissue and normal colorectal mucosa samples

Immunostaining of pMEK5 in CRC tissues and normal mucosae was detected as brown-yellow granules in the cytoplasm (Figure 1). Overexpression of pMEK5 protein was observed in 186 of the 335 CRC tissues (55.5%; Figure 1D1/2). In contrast, only 6 of the 80 normal colorectal samples were upregulated for pMEK5, 74 samples had negative or weakly positive pMEK5 expression (Figure 1B1/2). Statistical analysis indicated that the CRC tissue samples exhibited significantly elevated expression of pMEK5 relative to that observed in the normal colorectal tissues (P < 0.0001; Figure 1A1/2; Table 1).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2407-12-127/MediaObjects/12885_2011_Article_3104_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Immunohistochemical analysis of the expression of pMEK5 protein. pMEK5 expression was localized within the cytoplasm. A1 and A2, Elevated pMEK5 expression in the tumor cells of CRC tissue (T) compared with those of adjacent normal mucosa (N); B1 and B2, only weak staining of pMEK5 was detected in normal colorectal epithelial tissue; C1 and C2, moderately positive expression of pMEK5 in CRC without distant metastasis; D1 and D2, strongly positive expression of pMEK5 in CRC with distant metastasis (Left panels, ×100, right panels, ×400).

Table 1

pMEK5 expression in normal mucosa and CRC tissues

Tissue sample

All cases

pMEK5 protein

Pvalue

  

Normal expression

Overexpression

 

Normal mucosa

80

74(92.5%)

6(7.5%)

< 0.001

Carcinomas

335

149 (44.5%)

186 (55.5%)

 
To confirm the expression levels of pMEK5 seen by immunostaining in the specimens from our TMA, we examined the expression of pMEK5 protein by Western blot analysis in 19 randomly selected pairs of CRC tissues and their matched nontumor colorectal tissues. In 12 of 19 (62.1%) CRC patients, pMEK5 protein was upregulated in tumor tissues compared with their adjacent nontumor colorectal tissues (Figure 2).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2407-12-127/MediaObjects/12885_2011_Article_3104_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

Western blot analysis of pMEK5 protein expression. Western blot analysis of pMEK5 proteins expressed in eight pairs represents colorectal tumor tissues (T) and their matched adjacent nontumor tissues (N). Expression level was normalized with β-actin.

Correlation of pMEK5 protein expression and clinicopathologic parameters

The relationship between immunohistochemical pMEK5 expression in CRC tissues and various clinicopathologic characteristics is shown in Table 2. The expression (staining) of pMEK5 was highly correlated with depth of invasion (P = 0.001), lymph node metastasis (P < 0.001), distant metastasis (P < 0.001), preoperative CEA level (P < 0.001) and TNM stage (P < 0.001). However, pMEK5 expression was not significantly associated with age at surgery, sex, tumor location, differentiation grade or preoperative CA19-9 level (P > 0.05; Table 2).
Table 2

Correlation between pMEK5 expression and clinicopathologic characteristics

Variable

Cases

pMEK5 protein

Pvalue

  

Normal expression

Overexpression

 

Sex

   

0.055

   Female

158

79(50.0%)

79(50.0%)

 

   Male

177

70(39.5%)

107(60.5%)

 

Age at surgery, years

   

0.835

   < 65

189

85(45.0%)

104(55.0%)

 

   ≥ 65

146

64(43.8%)

82(56.2%)

 

Tumour location

   

0.440

   Right colon

57

21(36.8%)

36(63.2%)

 

   Left colon

99

45(44.5%)

54(54.5%)

 

   Rectum

179

83(46.4%)

96(53.6%)

 

pT (invasion depth)

   

0.001

   T1+ T2

62

39(62.9%)

23(37.1%)

 

   T3+ T4

273

110(40.3%)

163(59.7%)

 

pN (lymph node metastasis)

   

< 0.001

   N0

203

113(55.7%)

90(44.3%)

 

   N1-N2

132

36(27.3%)

96(72.7%)

 

pM (distant metastasis)

   

< 0.001

   M0

305

146(47.9%)

159(52.1%)

 

   M1

30

3(10.0%)

27(90.0%)

 

TNM stage

   

< 0.001

   I

49

35(71.4%)

14(28.6%)

 

   II

145

78(53.8%)

67(46.2%)

 

   III

111

33(29.7%)

78(70.3%)

 

   IV

30

3(10.0%)

27(90.0%)

 

Differentiation grade

   

0.074

   Well

29

17(58.6%)

12(41.4%)

 

   Moderate

278

124(44.6%)

154(55.4%)

 

   Poorly

28

8(28.6%)

20(71.4%)

 

Preoperative CEA level

   

< 0.001

   < 5 ng/ml

190

102(53.7%)

88(46.3%)

 

   ≥ 5 ng/ml

145

47(32.4%)

98(67.6%)

 

Preoperative CA19-9 level

   

0.251

   < 60 U/ml

296

135(45.6%)

161(54.4%)

 

   ≥ 60 U/ml

39

14(35.9%)

25(64.1%)

 

Survival analysis

The mean patient follow-up time was 71.5 months with a median value of 62.4 months. The 5-year OS rate of the 335 patients with primary colorectal cancer was 69.6%, with 102 deaths observed during the follow-up period. The 5-year DFS rate was 67.8%. During the time of follow-up, 82 patients (24.5%) developed distant metastasis or local recurrence. According to the univariate analyses, patients whose localized colorectal tumors overexpressed pMEK5 had a significantly lower 5-year DFS than patients with normal pMEK5 expression in their tumors (hazard ratio: 1.898; 95%CI: 1.264-2.850; P = 0.002; Figure 3A; Table 3). Similarly, the 5-year OS was also significantly lower in CRC patients with pMEK5 overexpression than CRC patients with normal pMEK5 expression in their tumors (HR: 2.107; 95%CI: 1.376-3.227; P < 0.001; Figure 3B; Table 4). In addition, tumor location (P = 0.018), lymph node metastasis (P < 0.001), distant metastasis (P < 0.001), TNM stage (P < 0.001), differentiation grade (P < 0.001), preoperative CEA level (P = 0.004) and preoperative CA19-9 level (P = 0.013) were statistically significantly associated with DFS and OS.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2407-12-127/MediaObjects/12885_2011_Article_3104_Fig3_HTML.jpg
Figure 3

Survival analysis of primary CRC patients (n = 335). Kaplan-Meier estimates of the DFS (A) and OS (B) according to pMEK5 expression in 335 patients. The DFS and OS were significantly lower in patients with pMEK5 overexpression when compared with patients who had normal pMEK5 expression. P values were calculated using the log-rank test.

Table 3

Cox proportional hazards model univariate and multivariate analyses of individual parameters for correlations with disease-free survival (DFS)

Variable

Univariate analysis

Multivariate analysis

 

HR

CI(95%)

Pvalue

HR

CI(95%)

Pvalue

Sex

      

   Female

1

     

   Male

0.966

0.662-1.409

0.856

   

Age at surgery, years

      

   < 65

1

     

   ≥ 65

1.228

0.841-1.794

0.287

   

Tumor location

      

   Colon

1

  

1

  

   Rectum

1.602

1.083-2.368

0.018

1.874

1.255-2.801

0.001

TNM stage

      

   I-II

1

  

1

  

   III-IV

2.851

1.933-4.204

< 0.001

2.383

1.572-3.614

< 0.001

pT (invasion depth)

      

   T1-T2

1

     

   T3-T4

1.398

0.822-2.379

0.216

   

pN (lymph node metastasis)

      

   N0

1

     

   N1-N2

2.351

1.607-3.439

< 0.001

   

pM (distant metastasis)

      

   M0

1

     

   M1

7.250

4.619-11.38

< 0.001

   

Differentiation grade

      

   Well and Moderate

1

  

1

  

   Poorly

3.082

1.830-5.188

< 0.001

2.988

1.746-5.114

< 0.001

Preoperative CEA level

      

   < 5 ng/ml

1

  

1

  

   ≥ 5 ng/ml

1.748

1.196-2.556

0.004

1.192

0.789-1.801

0.405

Preoperative CA19-9 level

      

   < 60 U/ml

1

  

1

  

   ≥ 60 U/ml

1.926

1.146-3.236

0.013

1.779

1.035-3.056

0.037

Phospho-MEK5 protein

      

   Normal expression

1

  

1

  

   Overexpression

1.898

1.264-2.850

0.002

1.388

0.900-2.141

0.139

Table 4

Cox proportional hazards model univariate and multivariate analyses of individual parameters for correlations with overall survival (OS)

Variable

Univariate analysis

Multivariate analysis

 

HR

CI(95%)

Pvalue

HR

CI(95%)

Pvalue

Sex

      

   Female

1

     

   Male

1.008

0.683-1.488

0.967

   

Age at surgery, years

      

   < 65

1

     

   ≥ 65

1.201

0.813-1.773

0.357

   

Tumor location

      

   Colon

1

  

1

  

   Rectum

1.560

1.044-2.331

0.030

1.794

1.191-2.701

0.005

TNM stage

      

   I-II

1

  

1

  

   III-IV

2.884

1.932-4.306

< 0.001

2.287

1.490-3.510

< 0.001

pT (invasion depth)

      

   T1-T2

1

     

   T3-T4

1.373

0.794-2.376

0.257

   

pN (lymph node metastasis)

      

   N0

1

     

   N1-N2

2.346

1.586-3.469

< 0.001

   

pM (distant metastasis)

      

   M0

1

     

   M1

7.292

4.601-11.558

< 0.001

   

Differentiation grade

      

   Well and Moderate

1

  

1

  

   Poorly

3.206

1.900-5.409

< 0.001

2.853

1.658-4.907

< 0.001

Preoperative CEA level

      

   < 5 ng/ml

1

  

1

  

   ≥ 5 ng/ml

1.904

1.287-2.817

0.001

1.280

0.834-1.964

0.259

Preoperative CA19-9 level

      

   < 60 U/ml

1

  

1

  

   ≥ 60 U/ml

1.911

1.119-3.262

0.018

1.587

0.905-2.782

0.107

Phospho-MEK5 protein

      

   Normal expression

1

  

1

  

   Overexpression

2.107

1.376-3.227

< 0.001

1.518

0.964-2.388

0.071

Multivariate analysis was performed using the Cox proportional hazards model for all of the significant variables in the univariate analysis; however, T stage, lymph node metastasis, and distant metastasis were collinear with TNM stage, so we excluded lymph node metastasis and distant metastasis from the final model [26]. The results from the multivariate analyses for DFS and OS showed that the pMEK5 expression (P > 0.05) were not independent prognostic factors for overall survival (Table 4).

Discussion

Malignant growth is often described as increased cellular proliferation induced by uncontrolled activation of mitogenic signaling pathways [27]. The MEK5/ERK5 signaling pathway regulates a wide variety of cellular processes during development and also plays an important role in human malignant diseases[28]. The MEK5/ERK5 signaling pathway is upregulated in many types of cancer, including prostate cancer [1115], breast cancer [1621], and oral squamous cell carcinoma [29]. In metastatic prostate cancer, strong MEK5 expression is correlated with bony metastases, and less favorable prognosis is caused by upregulated BMK1-induced activator protein-1 (AP-1) activity, a consequent induction of a high level of matrix metallo-protease-9 (MMP-9) and augmented invasive potential [11]. In oral squamous cell carcinoma, Sticht and colleagues [29] found that the high pERK5 expression in oral squamous cell carcinoma was associated with an advanced tumor stage and the presentation of lymph node metastases. In breast cancer cells, the activated oncogene STAT3 binds to the promoter regions of MEK5 and induces transcription, conferring a critical survival signal [17]. Moreover, during chemotherapeutic-induced apoptosis, overexpression of MEK5 in breast cancer cells provides a key survival signal for chemoresistence [30]. These findings suggested that pMEK5 might be involved in tumor progression and metastatic events.

Our original studies find that activation of MEK5 (pMEK5) was increased in CRC cases. We examined the expression of pMEK5 by immunohistochemistry and western blot, and found that pMEK5 protein expression was increased in CRC compared with adjacent normal mucosa from the same individual. Furthermore, we find that the pMEK5 expression status was significantly correlated with progression of CRC.

In this study, we examined the expression of pMEK5 in 335 cases of CRC by immunohistochemistry. pMEK5 was highly expressed with depth of invasion, especially in T3, T4 carcinomas, but not in T1 and T2 carcinomas (P = 0.001). Therefore, the depth of invasion is a very important prognostic factor, suggesting that pMEK5 can be used as a biomarker to identify subsets of CRC patients with more aggressive feature.

Another interesting finding was that lymph node metastases were detected more frequently in CRC patients with pMEK5 overexpression, when compared with normal cases of pMEK5 expression (P < 0.001). The same tendency was observed in distant metastases (P < 0.001), suggesting that the pMEK5 protein may play a role in tumor metastasis, which is consistent with previous studies of prostate cancer [11]. Consistently, we found that pMEK5 expression in CRC was positive correlation with TNM stage, and pMEK5-overexpression was significantly higher in cases at advanced stage than those at early stage.

One of the greatest challenges in colorectal cancer management is to accurately diagnose the tumor stage and determine proper adjuvant therapy. In early CRC, surgery may be all that is required [31, 32]. In more advanced cancer, other treatments, such as chemotherapy or radiation therapy, may be required [33, 34]. So, detection of the tumor stage seemed to be very important. Currently, the TMN staging system of tumors continues to be the gold standard for clinical stages in world wild. However, identifying the lymph node metastasis and distant metastasis with TNM staging system is difficult. For the TNM staging system, the screening of distant metastasis is primarily determined by imaging studies (CT, MRI or PET-CT), ultrasound, and by direct visualization and palpation during operation. These common examination methods have poor detection of early distant metastasis, such as CRC patients with less than 1 cm liver metastasis [35]. Our study found that pMEK5 could be helpful in the pathological study of CRC, especially for the classification of different stages in CRC and early distant metastasis, which would improve efficacy of multimodal therapy and allocation of resources, sparing patients from unnecessary procedures.

Moreover, Kaplan-Meier analysis of the survival curves showed a significantly worse 5-year disease-free (log-rank test, P = 0.002) and 5-year overall survival rate (log-rank test, P < 0.001) for patients whose tumors overexpressed pMEK5. This suggests that pMEK5 protein is a biomarker identifying a poor prognosis for patients with colorectal cancer. However, multivariate analysis showed that pMEK5 expression is not a biomarker for a worse prognosis (DFS: P = 0.139; OS: P = 0.071). Our results demonstrate that pMEK5 expression was correlated with a worse prognosis, but that pMEK5 was not an independent prognostic factor for CRC. The key reason may be due to the lack of adequate cases.

However, this study is retrospective look at the expression of pMEK5 in the CRC tissue, it is not able to establish if the expression of the pMEK5 is after CRC has occurred. And the mechanism of actions for pMEK5 protein is not known and needs further investigation. Patients with colorectal cancer whose pMEK5 expression is elevated may require a more powerful adjunctive therapy and intensive follow-up. Whether pMEK5 has value clinically as a biomarker for therapeutic approaches in patients with colorectal cancer should be followed up with additional appropriately, designed studies.

Conclusions

In summary, we have provided original data to support an important role of pMEK5 overexpression in human CRC. Overexpression of the pMEK5 protein could be helpful in the classification of different stages in CRC, and it can be used as an adjunct to the TNM stage system to assess clinical stage.

Notes

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.30872488&81072042 to L. Wang; 81072042 to JP. Wang) and the Science foundation of Guangdong Province, China (2011BO31800177).

We thank Sergei Ivanov (American) for his critical review and language editing of this manuscript as well as Dianke Chen for his technical support.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University
(2)
Shenzhen people's Hospital
(3)
Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine

References

  1. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D: Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011, 61 (2): 69-90. 10.3322/caac.20107.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Li S, Wang J, Lu Y, Fan D: Screening and early diagnosis of colorectal cancer in China: a 12 year retrospect (1994-2006). J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2007, 133 (10): 679-686. 10.1007/s00432-007-0231-z.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Chan AT, Giovannucci EL: Primary prevention of colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology. 2010, 138 (6): 2029-2043. 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.01.057. e2010View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Siegel R, Ward E, Brawley O, Jemal A: Cancer statistics, 2011: the impact of eliminating socioeconomic and racial disparities on premature cancer deaths. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011, 61 (4): 212-236. 10.3322/caac.20121.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. de Noo ME, Tollenaar RA, Deelder AM, Bouwman LH: Current status and prospects of clinical proteomics studies on detection of colorectal cancer: hopes and fears. World J Gastroenterol. 2006, 12 (41): 6594-6601.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Zhou G, Bao ZQ, Dixon JE: Components of a new human protein kinase signal transduction pathway. J Biol Chem. 1995, 270 (21): 12665-12669.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. English JM, Vanderbilt CA, Xu S, Marcus S, Cobb MH: Isolation of MEK5 and differential expression of alternatively spliced forms. J Biol Chem. 1995, 270 (48): 28897-28902. 10.1074/jbc.270.48.28897.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Wang X, Tournier C: Regulation of cellular functions by the ERK5 signalling pathway. Cell Signal. 2006, 18 (6): 753-760. 10.1016/j.cellsig.2005.11.003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Hayashi M, Kim SW, Imanaka-Yoshida K, Yoshida T, Abel ED, Eliceiri B, Yang Y, Ulevitch RJ, Lee JD: Targeted deletion of BMK1/ERK5 in adult mice perturbs vascular integrity and leads to endothelial failure. J Clin Invest. 2004, 113 (8): 1138-1148.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Hayashi M, Fearns C, Eliceiri B, Yang Y, Lee JD: Big mitogen-activated protein kinase 1/extracellular signal-regulated kinase 5 signaling pathway is essential for tumor-associated angiogenesis. Cancer Res. 2005, 65 (17): 7699-7706.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Mehta PB, Jenkins BL, McCarthy L, Thilak L, Robson CN, Neal DE, Leung HY: MEK5 overexpression is associated with metastatic prostate cancer, and stimulates proliferation, MMP-9 expression and invasion. Oncogene. 2003, 22 (9): 1381-1389. 10.1038/sj.onc.1206154.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. McCracken SR, Ramsay A, Heer R, Mathers ME, Jenkins BL, Edwards J, Robson CN, Marquez R, Cohen P, Leung HY: Aberrant expression of extracellular signal-regulated kinase 5 in human prostate cancer. Oncogene. 2008, 27 (21): 2978-2988. 10.1038/sj.onc.1210963.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Dudderidge TJ, McCracken SR, Loddo M, Fanshawe TR, Kelly JD, Neal DE, Leung HY, Williams GH, Stoeber K: Mitogenic growth signalling, DNA replication licensing, and survival are linked in prostate cancer. Br J Cancer. 2007, 96 (9): 1384-1393.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Ramsay AK, McCracken SR, Soofi M, Fleming J, Yu AX, Ahmad I, Morland R, Machesky L, Nixon C, Edwards DR, et al: ERK5 signalling in prostate cancer promotes an invasive phenotype. Br J Cancer. 2011, 104 (4): 664-672. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6606062.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Ghosh AK, Steele R, Ray RB: c-myc Promoter-binding protein 1 (MBP-1) regulates prostate cancer cell growth by inhibiting MAPK pathway. J Biol Chem. 2005, 280 (14): 14325-14330. 10.1074/jbc.M413313200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Esparis-Ogando A, Diaz-Rodriguez E, Montero JC, Yuste L, Crespo P, Pandiella A: Erk5 participates in neuregulin signal transduction and is constitutively active in breast cancer cells overexpressing ErbB2. Mol Cell Biol. 2002, 22 (1): 270-285. 10.1128/MCB.22.1.270-285.2002.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Song H, Jin X, Lin J: Stat3 upregulates MEK5 expression in human breast cancer cells. Oncogene. 2004, 23 (50): 8301-8309. 10.1038/sj.onc.1208026.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Ostrander JH, Daniel AR, Lofgren K, Kleer CG, Lange CA: Breast tumor kinase (protein tyrosine kinase 6) regulates heregulin-induced activation of ERK5 and p38 MAP kinases in breast cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2007, 67 (9): 4199-4209. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-3409.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Montero JC, Ocana A, Abad M, Ortiz-Ruiz MJ, Pandiella A, Esparis-Ogando A: Expression of Erk5 in early stage breast cancer and association with disease free survival identifies this kinase as a potential therapeutic target. PLoS One. 2009, 4 (5): e5565-10.1371/journal.pone.0005565.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Whyte J, Bergin O, Bianchi A, McNally S, Martin F: Key signalling nodes in mammary gland development and cancer. Mitogen-activated protein kinase signalling in experimental models of breast cancer progression and in mammary gland development. Breast Cancer Res. 2009, 11 (5): 209-10.1186/bcr2361.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Castro NE, Lange CA: Breast tumor kinase and extracellular signal-regulated kinase 5 mediate Met receptor signaling to cell migration in breast cancer cells. Breast Cancer Res. 2010, 12 (4): R60-10.1186/bcr2622.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Nagel S, Burek C, Venturini L, Scherr M, Quentmeier H, Meyer C, Rosenwald A, Drexler HG, MacLeod RA: Comprehensive analysis of homeobox genes in Hodgkin lymphoma cell lines identifies dysregulated expression of HOXB9 mediated via ERK5 signaling and BMI1. Blood. 2007, 109 (7): 3015-3023.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Garaude J, Cherni S, Kaminski S, Delepine E, Chable-Bessia C, Benkirane M, Borges J, Pandiella A, Iniguez MA, Fresno M, et al: ERK5 activates NF-kappaB in leukemic T cells and is essential for their growth in vivo. J Immunol. 2006, 177 (11): 7607-7617.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Ramos-Nino ME, Blumen SR, Sabo-Attwood T, Pass H, Carbone M, Testa JR, Altomare DA, Mossman BT: HGF mediates cell proliferation of human mesothelioma cells through a PI3K/MEK5/Fra-1 pathway. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2008, 38 (2): 209-217.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Rhodes A, Jasani B, Barnes DM, Bobrow LG, Miller KD: Reliability of immunohistochemical demonstration of oestrogen receptors in routine practice: interlaboratory variance in the sensitivity of detection and evaluation of scoring systems. J Clin Pathol. 2000, 53 (2): 125-130. 10.1136/jcp.53.2.125.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Dawood S, Broglio K, Gonzalez-Angulo AM, Kau SW, Islam R, Hortobagyi GN, Cristofanilli M: Prognostic value of body mass index in locally advanced breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2008, 14 (6): 1718-1725. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-1479.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Eggstein S, Franke M, Kutschka I, Manthey G, von Specht BU, Ruf G, Farthmann EH: Expression and activity of mitogen activated protein kinases in human colorectal carcinoma. Gut. 1999, 44 (6): 834-838. 10.1136/gut.44.6.834.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Yang Q, Lee JD: Targeting the BMK1 MAP kinase pathway in cancer therapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2011, 17 (11): 3527-3532. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-2504.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Sticht C, Freier K, Knopfle K, Flechtenmacher C, Pungs S, Hofele C, Hahn M, Joos S, Lichter P: Activation of MAP kinase signaling through ERK5 but not ERK1 expression is associated with lymph node metastases in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). Neoplasia. 2008, 10 (5): 462-470.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Weldon CB, Scandurro AB, Rolfe KW, Clayton JL, Elliott S, Butler NN, Melnik LI, Alam J, McLachlan JA, Jaffe BM, et al: Identification of mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase as a chemoresistant pathway in MCF-7 cells by using gene expression microarray. Surgery. 2002, 132 (2): 293-301. 10.1067/msy.2002.125389.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Booth RA: Minimally invasive biomarkers for detection and staging of colorectal cancer. Cancer Lett. 2007, 249 (1): 87-96. 10.1016/j.canlet.2006.12.021.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Karantanas AH, Yarmenitis S, Papanikolaou N, Gourtsoyiannis N: Preoperative imaging staging of rectal cancer. Dig Dis. 2007, 25 (1): 20-32. 10.1159/000099167.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Komatsu Y: Adjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal cancer in Japan-current state and problem areas. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2007, 34 (5): 799-807.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Daniels IR, Fisher SE, Heald RJ, Moran BJ: Accurate staging, selective preoperative therapy and optimal surgery improves outcome in rectal cancer: a review of the recent evidence. Colorectal Dis. 2007, 9 (4): 290-301. 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2006.01116.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Paschos KA, Bird N: Current diagnostic and therapeutic approaches for colorectal cancer liver metastasis. Hippokratia. 2008, 12 (3): 132-138.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/12/127/prepub

Copyright

© Hu et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement