Skip to main content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

A randomized controlled trial on the effectiveness of strength training on clinical and muscle cellular outcomes in patients with prostate cancer during androgen deprivation therapy: rationale and design

  • Lene Thorsen1Email author,
  • Tormod S Nilsen2,
  • Truls Raastad2,
  • Kerry S Courneya3,
  • Eva Skovlund4, 5 and
  • Sophie D Fosså1
Contributed equally
BMC Cancer201212:123

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-12-123

Received: 29 February 2012

Accepted: 29 March 2012

Published: 29 March 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
29 Feb 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
5 Mar 2012 Author responded Author comments - Lene Thorsen
Resubmission - Version 3
5 Mar 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
29 Mar 2012 Editorially accepted
29 Mar 2012 Article published 10.1186/1471-2407-12-123

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of oncology, Oslo university hospital
Department of Physical Performance, Norwegian School of Sports Sciences
Faculty of Physical Education and Recreation, University of Alberta
School of Pharmacy, University of Oslo
Norwegian Institute of Public Health