Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Why do results conflict regarding the prognostic value of the methylation status in colon cancers? the role of the preservation method

  • Benjamin Tournier1, 2Email author,
  • Caroline Chapusot1, 2, 3,
  • Emilie Courcet1, 2,
  • Laurent Martin2, 4,
  • Côme Lepage1, 3,
  • Jean Faivre1, 3 and
  • Françoise Piard1, 2, 3, 4
BMC Cancer201212:12

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-12-12

Received: 30 June 2011

Accepted: 13 January 2012

Published: 13 January 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
30 Jun 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
27 Jul 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Shuji Ogino
15 Aug 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - laura rozek
29 Sep 2011 Author responded Author comments - Benjamin Tournier
Resubmission - Version 3
29 Sep 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
6 Oct 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Shuji Ogino
12 Dec 2011 Author responded Author comments - Benjamin Tournier
Resubmission - Version 4
12 Dec 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
4 Jan 2012 Author responded Author comments - Benjamin Tournier
Resubmission - Version 7
4 Jan 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
13 Jan 2012 Editorially accepted
13 Jan 2012 Article published 10.1186/1471-2407-12-12

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Médicale, Université de Bourgogne
(2)
Service de Pathologie, CHU
(3)
Registre Bourguignon des Cancers Digestifs, CHU
(4)
Centre de ressources biologiques Ferdinand Cabanne

Advertisement