Why do results conflict regarding the prognostic value of the methylation status in colon cancers? the role of the preservation method
© Tournier et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 30 June 2011
Accepted: 13 January 2012
Published: 13 January 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|30 Jun 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|27 Jul 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Shuji Ogino|
|15 Aug 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - laura rozek|
|29 Sep 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Benjamin Tournier|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|29 Sep 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|6 Oct 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Shuji Ogino|
|12 Dec 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Benjamin Tournier|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|12 Dec 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|4 Jan 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Benjamin Tournier|
|Resubmission - Version 7|
|4 Jan 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 7|
|13 Jan 2012||Editorially accepted|
|13 Jan 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-2407-12-12|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.