Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Ki67, chemotherapy response, and prognosis in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant treatment

  • Peter A Fasching1Email author,
  • Katharina Heusinger2,
  • Lothar Haeberle2,
  • Melitta Niklos2,
  • Alexander Hein2,
  • Christian M Bayer2,
  • Claudia Rauh2,
  • Ruediger Schulz-Wendtland3,
  • Mayada R Bani2,
  • Michael Schrauder2,
  • Laura Kahmann2,
  • Michael P Lux2,
  • Johanna D Strehl4,
  • Arndt Hartmann4,
  • Arno Dimmler5,
  • Matthias W Beckmann2 and
  • David L Wachter4
Contributed equally
BMC Cancer201111:486

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-11-486

Received: 3 March 2011

Accepted: 14 November 2011

Published: 14 November 2011

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
3 Mar 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
3 Mar 2011 Author responded Author comments - David Lukas Wachter
Resubmission - Version 3
3 Mar 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
13 Apr 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jelle Wesseling
20 May 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Philippe Bedard
1 Jun 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Christine Simmons
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
15 Sep 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Philippe Bedard
23 Sep 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jelle Wesseling
13 Oct 2011 Author responded Author comments - David Lukas Wachter
Resubmission - Version 6
13 Oct 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 6
1 Nov 2011 Author responded Author comments - David Lukas Wachter
Resubmission - Version 7
1 Nov 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 7
4 Nov 2011 Author responded Author comments - David Lukas Wachter
Resubmission - Version 8
4 Nov 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 8
4 Nov 2011 Author responded Author comments - David Lukas Wachter
Resubmission - Version 9
4 Nov 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 9
Resubmission - Version 10
Submitted Manuscript version 10
7 Nov 2011 Author responded Author comments - David Lukas Wachter
Resubmission - Version 11
7 Nov 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 11
8 Nov 2011 Author responded Author comments - David Lukas Wachter
Resubmission - Version 12
8 Nov 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 12
Publishing
14 Nov 2011 Editorially accepted
14 Nov 2011 Article published 10.1186/1471-2407-11-486

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles
(2)
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital
(3)
Institute of Diagnostic Radiology, Erlangen University Hospital
(4)
Institute of Pathology, Erlangen University Hospital
(5)
Institute of Pathology, St Vincentius Hospital

Advertisement