Emergence of the rtA181T/sW172* mutant increased the risk of hepatoma occurrence in patients with lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B
© Yeh et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 19 July 2011
Accepted: 21 September 2011
Published: 21 September 2011
Development of the hepatitis B virus (HBV) rtA181T/sW172* mutant could occur during prolonged lamivudine (LAM) therapy, conferring cross resistance to adefovir. Recent studies demonstrated an increased oncogenic potential of this mutant in NIH3T3 cells. In this study, we aimed to investigate the clinical significance of this finding.
Serum samples from 123 LAM-resistant chronic hepatitis B patients were submitted for virological assays. A highly sensitive amplification created restriction enzyme site (ACRES) method was devised to detect small amounts of the rtA181T mutant in the serum. Virological factors including HBV-DNA level, genotype, precore G1896A, BCP A1762T/G1764A, rtM204I/V, rtA181T and pre-S internal deletion mutations as well as clinical variables including subsequent use of rescue drugs were submitted for outcome analysis.
By use of the highly sensitive ACRES method, the rtA181T mutant was detectable in 10 of the 123 LAM-resistant patients. During the mean follow-up period of 26.2 ± 16.4 months (range 2 to 108 months), 3 of the 10 (30.0%) rtA181T-positive patients and 2 of the 113 (1.8%) rtA181T-negative patients developed hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated that the presence of rtA181T mutation (P < 0.001), age > 50 years (P = 0.001), and liver cirrhosis (P < 0.001) were significantly associated with subsequent occurrence of HCC. All 5 HCC patients belonged to the older age and cirrhosis groups.
Emergence of the rtA181T/sW172* mutant in LAM-resistant patients increased the risk of HCC development in the subsequent courses of antiviral therapy.
In the past decade, much progress has been made in antiviral therapy for chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection [1–3]. Several approved therapeutic agents are now available, including regular or pegylated interferon and nucleoside/nucleotide analogues (NA) such as lamivudine (LAM), adefovir dipivoxial (ADV), entecavir (ETV), telbivudine and tenofovir [3–7]. Although NAs are very effective in inhibiting HBV reverse transcriptase, long-term usage of NAs is required to reduce the risk of hepatitis relapses on drug withdrawal. This strategy leads to development of drug resistance, a major challenge for hepatologists. The risk of developing LAM resistance is 14-32% in the first year and up to 70% by the fifth year . The most frequently encountered LAM-resistant mutant is rtM204V/I, which possesses a mutation located at the catalytic YMDD motif [8–11]. The rtL180M mutation usually occurs concurrently with the rtM204V mutation and serves as a compensatory mutation . The rtA181T mutation has also been reported in a substantial proportion of LAM-resistant patients, which has been shown to confer LAM-resistance in cell-based assays . Because of the overlap between the S and polymerase genes, a great proportion of patients carrying the rtA181T mutation also possessed the sW172* nonsense mutation, resulting in truncation of the pre-S/S reading frames .
The risk of developing ADV resistance was 2-3% and 28-29% by the second and fifth years of monotherapy in treatment naïve patients respectively [12–14]. The risk increased to 21% in LAM-resistant patients who were switched to ADV monotherapy after 1.5 years of ADV therapy [2, 3]. The major ADV resistant mutants were rtN236T and rtA181T/V . Resistance to ETV is rare for treatment naïve patients (1.5% by the fifth year) . However, in the presence of rtM204I/V mutations, ETV resistance can occur if the rtI169T, rtT184A/F/G/I/L/S, rtS202G/I, or rtM250V mutation coexists [15, 16]. The risk of developing telbivudine resistance was 2-3% and 21% after 1 and 2 years of therapy in treatment-naïve HBeAg-positive patients respectively. The major resistant mutant was rtM204I . Tenofovir has recently been found to be effective in suppressing HBV replication with a low risk of drug resistance and several reports have shown that this drug is effective against various NA resistant or cross-resistant mutants [18, 19].
It has been demonstrated that in patients with compensated cirrhosis, LAM therapy significantly reduces the risk of liver failure and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) . However, in patients who developed LAM resistance, this beneficial effect was drastically compromised. Several strategies of therapy have been examined in LAM resistance patients, including withdrawal of LAM therapy, switching to ADV monotherapy, ADV add-on treatment, and switching to ETV monotherapy. The latter two strategies are accepted in several therapeutic guidelines . Despite various efforts to develop effective rescue therapy for LAM-resistant patients, severe consequences such as HCC and liver failure still occur in a small number of patients [22–24].
Previous studies have indicated that several virological factors including HBV-DNA level, HBV e antigen (HBeAg) status, genotype, pre-S internal deletion mutant and basal core promoter (BCP) A1762T/G1764A mutation are closely associated with development of HCC in treatment naïve, chronic hepatitis B patients . However, the associated virological factors for severe disease outcomes in patients with LAM-resistant chronic hepatitis B have not been clearly delineated. A major reason these patients are started on long-term LAM treatment early in the course of their disease is to prevent the occurrence of HCC. The development of LAM-resistance significantly compromises the effectiveness of this strategy. It is imperative that the clinical and virological factors associated with the development of HCC in this group of patients be delineated. In this study, we analyzed the clinical variables, virological parameters, and use of rescue agents to identify factors associated with severe disease outcomes.
This study was conducted under the approval of the institutional review board of Chang Gung Medical Center. The clinical records of 157 patients who received LAM and developed drug resistance from January 2002 to December 2007 were reviewed. Of these patients, 123 were included because they had serum samples stored in the Liver Research Center Serum Bank that could be retrieved for virological analysis. All patients were positive for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) but negative for antibody against hepatitis D virus or antibody against hepatitis C virus. All patients were also tested negative for human immunodeficiency virus infection. The following clinicopathological data were retrospectively reviewed: gender, age, presence of liver cirrhosis, HBeAg status, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), the duration of LAM use before inclusion, subsequent use of ADV or ETV, total duration of NA use, and development of HCC or liver failure. None of the patients had detectable liver tumors (except hemangiomas) during the 3 years period prior to entry into this study. Monitoring of HCC occurrence was performed by measurement of AFP levels and ultrasonography every 3 months in cirrhotic patients and every 6 months in non-cirrhotic patients. Diagnosis of HCC was made by either echo-guided liver biopsy, fine needle aspiration cytology, high AFP level (> 200 ng/mL) plus at least one dynamic imaging study (dynamic computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging), or one dynamic imaging study plus angiography (if alpha-fetoprotein < 200 ng/mL).
Serum hepatitis markers, including HBsAg, HBeAg, and antibody to hepatitis D virus were assayed by commercially available kits (Ausria-II and HBeAg-RIA, Abbott Laboratories, North Chicago, IL; and anti-HD; Formosa Biomedical Technology Corporation, Taiwan). Serum antibody to hepatitis C virus was assayed using a third-generation enzyme immunoassay kits (HCV EIA III; Abbott Laboratories).
The HBV-DNA concentration was quantified by use of Roche COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS Taqman HBV Test (Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland). The detection limit of this test was 69 copies/mL. In this test, 5.82 copies/mL was equivalent to 1 IU/mL. HBV genotypes were determined using the restriction fragment length polymorphism method or phylogenetic sequence analysis . The methods to detect HBV basal core promoter (BCP) A1762T/G1764A mutations, precore stop codon G1896A mutation, rtM204I mutation, rtM204V mutation, rtL180M mutation were described previously [10, 26]. To identify pre-S internal deletion mutations, the pre-S region flanked by P1, 5'-GCGGGTCACCATATTCTTGGGAAC-3' (nt. 2821 to 2844, sense) and P2, 5'-GAGCAGGGGTCCTAGGAATC-3' (nt. 196 to 177, antisense) was amplified by PCR. The expected size was 596 bp in length. These PCR products were subjected to Southern blot analysis to identify positively hybridized bands < 500 bp in length. PCR products 500 to 596 bp in length were gel-purified and subjected to direct sequencing to identify pre-S deletion mutants with small deleted regions (< 100 bp in length). If a mixture of wild type and deletion mutants was found by direct sequencing, the gel-purified PCR product was cloned to pCR2.1-TOPO vector (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and 10-15 clones were sequenced to identify the deletion mutants.
Parametrical data were expressed in mean ± standard deviation (SD) when assumed normal distribution but in median (range) when they were not. Student-t test or Mann-Whitney test was used when appropriate. Fisher's exact test was used for dichotomous data. Logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the association of the clinical and virological variables with occurrence of the rtA181T mutant. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the accumulative incidence of HCC and the log-rank test was used to compare between groups. The Cox proportional hazard model was used to identify independent clinical and virological factors associated with HCC occurrence. Alpha error was adjusted according to the method of Bonferroni correction in multiple comparisons. Statistical analysis was conducted by the use of SPSS (version 13.0).
Clinical and virological characteristics in LAM-resistant chronic hepatitis B patients
Number of patients
46.0 ± 10.7
48.3 ± 10.2
146.5 ± 211.8
140.3 ± 222.7
223.1 ± 341.3
181.1 ± 287.6
HBV-DNA (106 copies/mL)
BCP 1762/1764 mutations (%)
Precore stop codon mutation (%)
Pre-S internal deletions (%)
Duration of LAM treatment before inclusion (months)
Of the 123 LAM-resistant patients, 58 (47.2%) subsequently received ADV (switch or add-on) rescue therapy, 20 (16.3%) received ETV (switch) rescue therapy, and 24 (19.5%) received ETV and ADV therapy sequentially secondary to the emergence of additional drug resistant mutants during their treatment courses. The remaining 21 (17.1%) patients continued to receive LAM monotherapy either because they had only mild hepatitis activities or because of barriers to access of rescue therapy.
Clinical and virological factors associated with HCC occurrence
Kaplan-Meier analysis for the association between clinical features and occurrence of HCC or severe consequences of liver diseases in LAM-resistant chronic hepatitis B patients
Clinical and virological factors
No. of patients
Severe liver consequences
P (Log Rank test)a
P (Log Rank test)a
HBV-DNA (×106 copies/mL)
≦ 2 ×UNL
> 2 ×UNL
≦ 2 ×UNL
> 2 ×UNL
Precore stop codon mutation
Pre-S internal deletions
Duration of LAM treatment on entry (months)
Subsequent ADV treatment
Subsequent ETV treatment
Subsequent ETV and/or ADV treatment
Total duration of antiviral therapy (months)
Clinical and virological factors associated with severe liver consequences
Three patients developed acute liver failure during the follow-up periods. Of these 3 patients, 2 had severe hepatitis exacerbations at 2 and 2.5 months respectively after detection of LAM-resistance. These two patients died of hepatic decompensation. The third patient developed liver failure 3 months after detection of LAM-resistance, but he underwent liver transplantation within 1 m. Taken together, 8 patients (5 with HCC and 3 who progressed to liver failure) developed severe consequences of liver diseases. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to estimate the association between severe liver consequences and each of the clinical and virological variables (Table 2). It was found that age > 50 years (P = 0.001), the presence of rtA181T mutation (P < 0.001), BCP A1762T/G1764A mutations (P = 0.002) and liver cirrhosis (P < 0.001) were significantly associated with severe liver consequences. No statistically significant difference was found between those with and without pre-S internal deletions. Notably, no association was found between disease outcomes and HBV-DNA level or use of rescue drugs (Table 2). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis using the forward stepwise model showed rtA181T to be the only variable that remained in the equation as an independent predictor (Hazard Ratio, 13.091; 95% CI, 3.255 to 52.653; P < 0.001).
Factors associated with development of rtA181T mutant
Univariate logistic regression analysis for the association between clinical features and emergence of rtA181T mutation in LAM-resistant patients
Yes (n = 10)
No (n = 113)
> 106 (0-> 106)
58.5 ± 8.3
45.7 ± 10.1
HBV-DNA (106 copies/mL)
147.0 ± 220.2
114.1 ± 122.1
217.3 ± 335.9
124.7 ± 124.7
Precore stop codon mutation
Pre-S internal deletions
Duration of LAM treatment (months)
Multiple linear regression analysis using the forward stepwise method showed that age (OR, 1.126; 95% CI, 1.032 to 1.229; P = 0.008) and cirrhosis (OR, 5.671; 95% CI, 1.063 to 30.248; P = 0.042) remained in the equation as independent predictors.
LAM is the first approved oral antiviral agent for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B and has been therefore widely used as the first line therapeutic agent in the past decades. Despite the availability of other NAs carrying lower risk of drug resistance (such as ADV and ETV), LAM remains to be a popular anti-HBV agent in many parts of the world because of its low cost, excellent safety profile in long term use, and absence of oncogenic potential in animal studies. However, because of widespread use, an increasing number of LAM-resistant patients have emerged.
Currently, the most widely accepted strategy for rescue therapy is ADV add-on treatment . The de novo development of the cross-resistant mutant, rtA181T, was about 4% in a 4-year period of combination treatment with LAM plus ADV . Previous studies also suggested effective viral suppression in LAM-resistant patients by adopting ADV or ETV monotherapy. However, it was found that the risk of developing ADV or ETV drug resistance was high with this strategy . Recently, it was shown that tenofovir is superior to ADV in treating LAM-resistant patients with a better viral suppression and no detectable genotypic resistance [18, 19].
Despite the availability of rescue therapy, severe disease outcomes still occurred in a substantial percentage of patients. Previous studies indicated that successful viral suppression in ADV add-on therapy did not prevent HCC occurrence in patients with liver cirrhosis [22, 24]. This study demonstrated that age > 50 years, cirrhosis, BCP mutation, and the presence of the rtA181T mutation, prior to initiation of rescue therapy were significantly associated with severe liver consequences. Interestingly, neither the choice of rescue drugs nor the duration of antiviral drug use seemed to affect the clinical outcomes of these patients. In fact of the 21 patients receiving LAM monotherapy, only 1 developed HCC. It is possible that rescue therapy was not initiated in these patients because they had mild hepatitis despite development of drug resistance. Notably, two important variables, HBV-DNA level and pre-S internal deletion mutants, which were frequently identified as prognostic indicators in treatment-naïve patients were not found to be associated with clinical outcomes in LAM-resistant patients. It is likely that during rescue therapy in these patients, HBV replication was suppressed to a low level, resulting in reduction in the development of the pre-S internal deletion mutations. In this view, the pre-S internal deletion mutants are unlikely to play an important role in hepatocarcinogenesis in this subset of patients.
The most striking finding in this study was that pre-existing rtA181T mutant in LAM-resistant patients was independently associated with severe liver consequences, especially occurrence of HCC. The rtA181T mutant has been shown to confer ADV-resistant [28–30]. In ADV add-on studies, it was found that rtA181T mutants could be either pre-existing in LAM-resistant patients or de novo-developed after ADV add-on therapy . Furthermore, because the reading frame of HBV polymerase overlaps with that of the S gene, some resistant mutations (such as rtA181T) in the polymerase gene coexist with S gene mutations, including stop codon mutations . In some patients with rtA181T mutants, a concomitant sW172* mutation was observed in the overlapping S reading frame, resulting in truncation of the pre-S/S proteins . Several previous studies have reported the transactivation activities of a truncated pre-S2 mutant isolated from the chromosomal integrated HBV genome of hepatoma cells. Such mutants were capable of transactivating several promoters including those of oncogenic proteins . Transactivation activity occurred only when the premature stop codons are located within a region of the S gene, named "transactivity-on-region" . The premature stop codon of the S gene in the rtA181T/sW172* mutant was located near the border of the transactivity-on-region and its transactivating activity was recently confirmed [35, 36]. Additionally, owing to secretory defect and a dominant negative effect on wild-type HBV virion secretion, emergence of rtA181T/sW172* largely reduced the typical extent of virological breakthrough in serum, resulting in difficulty to recognize drug resistance . In this study, a hypersensitive ACRES method was used to detect small percentages of the rtA181T mutants. Of the 10 rtA181T-positive patients, the mutants constituted < 5%, 10-30% and > 90% of the viral population in 6, 2, and 2 patients, respectively. We speculated that despite a small percentage of the mutants was detected in the serum, a larger percentage could exist in the liver, owing to the secretory defect of the sW172* mutant. Presumably, intrahepatic accumulation of this mutant partially contributed to its oncogenic effect.
Finally, in our study, 23 patients had two unfavorable conditions: liver cirrhosis and older than 50 years of age. During the follow-ups, 5 of the 23 patients (21.7%) developed HCC and 7 of the 23 (30.4%) patients developed severe liver consequences. The present data indicated that in this special subgroup of patients, careful selection of antiviral agent and closely monitoring for viral mutants (including BCP and rtA181T mutations) are mandatory.
By analyzing the clinical variables, virological parameters, and clinical use of rescue agents in LAM-resistant mutants, we found older age, cirrhosis, and rtA181T mutation are significantly associated with occurrence of HCC in the subsequent courses of antiviral therapy.
We are indebted to numerous members of the Liver Research Unit of Chang Gung Memorial Hospital for their help and encouragement. This study is supported by grants from Chang Gung Medical Research Council (CMRPG 380332), National Science Council, Taiwan (99-3112-B-182-009), and Department of Health, Taiwan (PMRPG390071).
- Wright TL: Introduction to chronic hepatitis B infection. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006, 101 (Suppl 1): S1-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zoulim F: Antiviral therapy of chronic hepatitis B. Antiviral Res. 2006, 71: 206-15. 10.1016/j.antiviral.2006.04.003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Keeffe EB, Marcellin P: New and Emerging Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007, 5: 285-94. 10.1016/j.cgh.2006.09.036.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lok AS, Lai CL, Leung N, Yao GB, Cui ZY, Schiff ER, Dienstag JL, Heathcote EJ, Little NR, Griffiths DA, Gardner SD, Castiglia M: Long-term safety of lamivudine treatment in patients with chronic hepatitis B. Gastroenterol. 2003, 125: 1714-22. 10.1053/j.gastro.2003.09.033.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Marcellin P, Chang TT, Lim SG, Tong MJ, Sievert W, Shiffman ML, Jeffers L, Goodman Z, Wulfsohn MS, Xiong S, Fry J, Brosgart CL, Adefovir Dipivoxil 437 Study Group: Adefovir dipivoxil for the treatment of hepatitis B e antigen-positive chronic hepatitis B. N Engl J Med. 2003, 348: 808-16. 10.1056/NEJMoa020681.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chang TT, Gish RG, de Man R, Gadano A, Sollano J, Chao YC, Lok AS, Han KH, Goodman Z, Zhu J, Cross A, DeHertogh D, Wilber R, Colonno R, Apelian D, BEHoLD AI463022 Study Group: A comparison of entecavir and lamivudine for HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B. N Engl J Med. 2006, 354: 1001-10. 10.1056/NEJMoa051285.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Peters MG, Andersen J, Lynch P, Liu T, Alston-Smith B, Brosgart CL, Jacobson JM, Johnson VA, Pollard RB, Rooney JF, Sherman KE, Swindells S, Polsky B, ACTG Protocol A5127 Team: Randomized controlled study of tenofovir and adefovir in chronic hepatitis B virus and HIV infection: ACTG A5127. Hepatol. 2006, 44: 1110-6. 10.1002/hep.21388.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Liaw YF, Chien RN, Yeh CT, Tsai SL, Chu CM: Acute exacerbation and hepatitis B virus clearance after emergence of YMDD motif mutation during lamivudine therapy. Hepatol. 1999, 30: 567-72. 10.1002/hep.510300221.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lai CL, Dienstag J, Schiff E, Leung NWY, Atkins M, Hunt C, Brown N, Woessner M, Boehme R, Condreay L: Prevalence and clinical correlates of YMDD variants during lamivudine therapy for patients with chronic hepatitis B. Clin Infect Dis. 2003, 36: 687-96. 10.1086/368083.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yeh CT, Chien RN, Chu CM, Liaw YF: Clearance of the original hepatitis B virus YMDD-motif mutants with emergence of distinct lamivudine-resistant mutants during prolonged lamivudine therapy. Hepatol. 2000, 31: 1318-26. 10.1053/jhep.2000.7296.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ono SK, Kato N, Shiratori Y, Kato J, Goto T, Schinazi RF, Carrilho FJ, Omata M: The polymerase L528M mutation cooperates with nucleotide binding-site mutations, increasing hepatitis B virus replication and drug resistance. J Clin Invest. 2001, 107: 449-455. 10.1172/JCI11100.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Angus P, Vaughan R, Xiong S, Yang H, Delaney W, Gibbs C, Brosgart C, Colledge D, Edwards R, Ayres A, Bartholomeusz A, Locarnini S: Resistance to adefovir dipivoxil therapy associated with the selection of a novel mutation in the HBV polymerase. Gastroenterology. 2003, 125: 292-297. 10.1016/S0016-5085(03)00939-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hadziyannis SJ, Tassopoulos NC, Heathcote EJ, Chang TT, Kitis G, Rizzetto M, Marcellin P, Lim SG, Goodman Z, Ma J, Brosgart CL, Borroto-Esoda K, Arterburn S, Chuck SL, Adefovir Dipivoxil 438 Study Group: Long-term therapy with adefovir dipivoxil for HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B for up to 5 years. Gastroenterology. 2006, 131: 1743-51. 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.09.020.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Delaney WE: Progress in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B: long-term experience with adefovir dipivoxil. J Antimicrob Chemotherapy. 2007, 59: 827-32. 10.1093/jac/dkl551.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Colonno RJ, Rose R, Baldick CJ, Levine S, Pokornowski K, Yu CF, Walsh A, Fang J, Hsu M, Mazzucco C, Eggers B, Zhang S, Plym M, Klesczewski K, Tenney DJ: Entecavir resistance is rare in nucleoside naive patients with hepatitis B. Hepatology. 2006, 44: 1656-65. 10.1002/hep.21422.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sherman M, Yurdaydin C, Sollano J, Silva M, Liaw YF, Cianciara J, Boron-Kaczmarska A, Martin P, Goodman Z, Colonno R, Cross A, Denisky G, Kreter B, Hindes R, AI463026 BEHoLD Study Group: Entecavir for treatment of lamivudine-refractory, HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B. Gastroenterology. 2006, 130: 2039-49. 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.04.007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lai CL, Gane E, Liaw YF, Hsu CW, Thongsawat S, Wang Y, Chen Y, Heathcote EJ, Rasenack J, Bzowej N, Naoumov NV, Di Bisceglie AM, Zeuzem S, Moon YM, Goodman Z, Chao G, Constance BF, Brown NA, Globe Study Group: Telbivudine versus lamivudine in patients with chronic hepatitis B. N Engl J Med. 2007, 357: 2576-88. 10.1056/NEJMoa066422.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schmutz G, Nelson M, Lutz T, Sheldon J, Bruno R, von Boemmel F, Hoffmann C, Rockstroh J, Stoehr A, Wolf E, Soriano V, Berger F, Berg T, Carlebach A, Schwarze-Zander C, Schürmann D, Jaeger H, Mauss S: Combination of tenofovir and lamivudine versus tenofovir after lamivudine failure for therapy of hepatitis B in HIV-coinfection. AIDS. 2006, 20: 1951-4. 10.1097/01.aids.0000247116.89455.5d.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lacombe K, Ollivet A, Gozlan J, Durantel S, Tran N, Girard PM, Zoulim F: A novel hepatitis B virus mutation with resistance to adefovir but not to tenofovir in an HIV-hepatitis B virus-co-infected patient. AIDS. 2006, 20: 2229-31. 10.1097/01.aids.0000252061.35422.84.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Liaw YF, Sung JJ, Chow WC, Farrell G, Lee CZ, Yuen H, Tanwandee T, Tao QM, Shue K, Keene ON, Dixon JS, Gray DF, Sabbat J, Cirrhosis Asian Lamivudine Multicentre Study Group: Lamivudine for patients with chronic hepatitis B and advanced liver disease. N Engl J Med. 2004, 351: 1521-31. 10.1056/NEJMoa033364.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Choi MS, Yoo BC: Management of chronic hepatitis B with nucleoside or nucleotide analogues: a review of current guidelines. Gut Liver. 2010, 4: 15-24. 10.5009/gnl.2010.4.1.15.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Elefsiniotis I, Buti M, Jardi R, Vezali E, Esteban R: Clinical outcome of lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B patients with compensated cirrhosis under adefovir salvage treatment. Importance of HCC surveillance. Eur J Intern Med. 2009, 20: 478-81. 10.1016/j.ejim.2008.12.013.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Akuta N, Suzuki F, Kawamura Y, Yatsuji H, Sezaki H, Suzuki Y, Hosaka T, Kobayashi M, Kobayashi M, Arase Y, Ikeda K, Kumada H: Virological response and hepatocarcinogenesis in lamivudine-resistant hepatitis B virus genotype C patients treated with lamivudine plus adefovir dipivoxil. Intervirology. 2008, 51: 385-93. 10.1159/000203283.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hosaka T, Suzuki F, Kobayashi M, Hirakawa M, Kawamura Y, Yastuji H, Sezaki H, Akuta N, Suzuki Y, Saitoh S, Arase Y, Ikeda K, Miyakawa Y, Kumada H: Development of HCC in patients receiving adefovir dipivoxil for lamivudine-resistant hepatitis B virus mutants. Hepatol Res. 2010, 40: 145-52. 10.1111/j.1872-034X.2009.00582.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Liu S, Zhang H, Gu C, Yin J, He Y, Xie J, Cao G: Associations between hepatitis B virus mutations and the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009, 101: 1066-82. 10.1093/jnci/djp180.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Hsu CW, Yeh CT, Chang ML, Liaw YF: Identification of a hepatitis B virus S gene mutant in lamivudine-treated patients experiencing HBsAg seroclearance. Gastroenterology. 2007, 132: 543-50. 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.12.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lampertico P, Viganò M, Manenti E, Iavarone M, Sablon E, Colombo M: Low resistance to adefovir combined with lamivudine: a 3-year study of 145 lamivudine-resistant hepatitis B patients. Gastroenterology. 2007, 133: 1445-51. 10.1053/j.gastro.2007.08.079.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Villet S, Pichoud C, Billioud G, Barraud L, Durantel S, Trépo C, Zoulim F: Impact of hepatitis B virus rtA181V/T mutants on hepatitis B treatment failure. J Hepatol. 2008, 48: 747-55. 10.1016/j.jhep.2008.01.027.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Karatayli E, Karayalçin S, Karaaslan H, Kayhan H, Türkyilmaz AR, Sahin F, Yurdaydin C, Bozdayi AM: A novel mutation pattern emerging during lamivudine treatment shows cross-resistance to adefovir dipivoxil treatment. Antivir Ther. 2007, 12: 761-8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gerolami R, Bourliere M, Colson P, Halfon P, Borentain P, Henry M, Botta D, Thibault V, Khiri H, Tamalet C: Unusual selection of rtA181V HBV mutants cross-resistant to adefovir following prolonged lamivudine monotherapy: report of two cases. Antivir Ther. 2006, 11: 1103-6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yeh CT: Development of HBV S gene mutants in chronic hepatitis B patients receiving nucleotide/nucleoside analogue therapy. Antivir Ther. 2010, 15 (3 PtB): 471-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Warner N, Locarnini S: The antiviral drug selected hepatitis B virus rtA181T/sW172* mutant has a dominant negative secretion defect and alters the typical profile of viral rebound. Hepatology. 2008, 48: 88-98. 10.1002/hep.22295.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kekule AS, Lauer U, Meyer M, Caselmann WH, Hofschneider PH, Koshy R: The preS2/S region of integrated hepatitis B virus DNA encodes a transcriptional transactivator. Nature. 1990, 343: 457-61. 10.1038/343457a0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lauer U, Weiss L, Hofschneider PH, Kekule AS: The hepatitis B virus pre-S/S(t) transactivator is generated by 3' truncations within a defined region of the S gene. J Virol. 1992, 66: 5284-9.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Lai MW, Huang SF, Hsu CW, Chang MH, Liaw YF, Yeh CT: Identification of nonsense mutations in hepatitis B virus S gene in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma developed after lamivudine therapy. Antivir Ther. 2009, 14: 249-61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lai MW, Yeh CT: The oncogenic potential of hepatitis B virus rtA181T/surface truncation mutant. Antivir Ther. 2008, 13: 875-9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/11/398/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.