Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Sentinel lymph node biopsy is unsuitable for routine practice in younger female patients with unilateral low-risk papillary thyroid carcinoma

  • Ou Huang1, 3,
  • WeiLi Wu2,
  • OuChen Wang3,
  • Jie You3,
  • Quan Li3,
  • DuPing Huang3,
  • XiaoQu Hu3,
  • JinMiao Qu3,
  • Cun Jin3,
  • YouQun Xiang3,
  • Kai Yang3,
  • ShuMei Zhou3,
  • XueMin Chen3,
  • YiFei Pan3,
  • GuiLong Guo3 and
  • XiaoHua Zhang3Email author
Contributed equally
BMC Cancer201111:386

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-11-386

Received: 17 September 2010

Accepted: 2 September 2011

Published: 2 September 2011



Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy has been used to assess patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). To achieve its full potential the rate of SLN identification must be as close to 100 percent as possible. In the present study we compared the combination of preoperative lymphoscintigraphy scanning by sulfur colloid labeled with 99 m Technetium, gamma-probe guided surgery, and methylene blue with methylene blue, alone, for sentinel node identification in younger women with unilateral low-risk PTC.


From January 2004 to January 2007, 90 female patients, ages 23 to 44 (mean = 35), with unilateral low-risk PTC (T1-2N0M0) were prospectively studied. Mean tumor size was 1.3 cm (range, 0.8-3.7 cm). All patients underwent unilateral modified neck dissection. Prior to surgery, patients had, by random assignment, identification and biopsy of SLNs by methylene blue, alone (Group 1), or by sulfur colloid labeled with 99 m Technetium, gamma-probe guided surgery and methylene blue (Group 2).


In the methylene blue group, SLNs were identified in 39 of 45 patients (86.7%). Of the 39 patients, 28 (71.8%) had positive cervical lymph nodes (pN+), and 21 patients (53.8%) had pSLN+. In 7 of the 28 pN+ patients (25%), metastases were also detected in non-SLN, thus giving a false-negative rate (FNR of 38.9% (7/18), a negative predictive value (NPV) of 61.1% (11/18), and an accuracy of 82.1% (32/39). In the combined technique group, the identification rate (IR) of SLN was 100% (45/45). Of the 45 patients, 27 (60.0%) had pN+, 24 (53.3%) had pSLN+. There was a FNR of 14.3% (3/21), a NPV of 85.7% (18/21), and an accuracy of 93.3% (42/45). The combined techniques group was significantly superior to the methylene blue group in IR (p = 0.035). There were no significant differences between two groups in sensitivity, specificity, NPV, or accuracy. Location of pN+ (55 patients) in 84 patients was: level I and V, no patients; level II, 1 patient (1.2%); level III, 6 patients (7.2%); level III and IV, 8 patients (9.5%); level IV, alone, 8 patients (9.5%); level VI, 32 patients (38.1%). In all 90 patients, IR of SLN was 93.3%, FNR, 25.6%, NPV, 74.4%, and accuracy rate, 88.1 percent.


Compared to a single technique, there was a significantly higher SLN identification rate for the combined technique in younger female with ipsilateral, low-risk PTC (T1-2N0M0). Thus, a combined SLN biopsy technique seems to more accurately stage lymph nodes, with better identification of SLN located out of the central compartment. Regardless of the procedure used, the high FNR renders the current SLN techniques unsuitable for routine practice. Based on these results, prophylactic node dissection of level VI might be considered because 38.1% of our patients had such node metastases.


Nodal metastases are a significant risk factor for survival in patients with papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) [1]. Recent studies have suggested the use of sentinel lymph node (SLN) detection as a less invasive method for studying lymphatic metastatic spread in patients with breast [2, 3], melanoma [4], cervical [5, 6], and thyroid cancers [7, 8]. SLN biopsy has potential advantages, for example, in reducing morbidity compared with elective lymph node dissection, and could offer a standardized technique of lymph node evaluation in PTC patients. Because of its high sensitivity, accuracy and low false-negative rate in predicting axillary lymph node (ALN) status, SLN biopsy has obtained widespread consensus and replaced routine ALN dissection as the standard for staging in breast cancer [9]. The success of SLN biopsy in breast cancer has set a good example for other types of solid tumors [3, 4, 6], including thyroid cancer [7, 8]. It has been demonstrated that SLN biopsy for thyroid cancer is both feasible and safe, using intraoperative isosulfan blue vital dye or preoperative lymphoscintigraphy scanning [7, 8]. However, there are differences between thyroid and breast cancer, so that questions need be answered before the utility of SLN biopsy becomes standard practice. For example, while lymphatic drainage is largely orderly progression in breast cancer, it is not as predictable in thyroid cancer, perhaps due to prior thyroid disease. Thus, it has been suggested that there be further investigation [7]. Whether SLN biopsy in thyroid cancer has a predictive value similar to that in breast cancer, thus replacing neck dissection, is needs to be confirmed.

Most studies concerning the SLN biopsy in thyroid cancer have been conducted in Western populations [7, 8, 1020], while similar data is not available for the Chinese population. Moreover, the means used to identify the SLN varies. Some rely on intraoperative of blue dye (isosulfan blue dye, Canada)[7], patent blue dye [Patent Blue-V, Hong Kong) [17], methylene blue [Japan 13]), radiotracer (99 mTc-colloid, Turkey) [21], 99 mTc sulfur colloid (Switzerland) [19], and 99 mTc nanocolloid (Italy) [19], to identify sentinel nodes. However, others rely on blue dye, alone. Furthermore, the risk of nodal metastases varies considerably between age and tumor size [22]. Age is the most important prognostic factor for thyroid cancer. According to the National Thyroid Cancer Treatment Cooperative Study (NTCTCS) staging classification registration, patients older than 45 with cervical lymph node metastases were classified as stage III (high risk), whereas those younger than 45 with such lymph node metastases were considered as stage I (low risk) [22]. The comparative analyses of SLN biopsy by methylene blue, only, or the combined technique have not been reported in younger-than-45 female patients with ipsilateral, low-risk PTC (T1-2N0M0) in either the Western or Chinese populations. Doing so could aid in determining the use of SLN biopsy in this PTC group.

For the above reasons, we hypothesized that SLN biopsy could provide accurate assessment of cervical lymph nodes, as it does in breast cancer, and initiated a clinical trial to define its role. By using intraoperative methylene blue, only, or the combined techniques (preoperative lymphoscintigraphy scanning by sulfur colloid labeled with 99 m Technetium, gamma-probe guided surgery, and intraoperative blue dye injection). Further, we sought to identify which technique might have a better predictive value.



The study was approved by the institutional review board of Wenzhou Medical College, and informed consent was obtained in writing from all patients after discussion of risks and benefits with the operating surgeon. From January 2004 to January 2007, all patients with a preoperative diagnosis of PTC by fine-needle aspiration, clinically node-negative detected by clinical examination and ultrasound were asked to participate in this study. All were female and had only one unilateral tumor site by ultrasound. Exclusion criteria were a previous history of neck operation, current pregnancy, and known hypersensitivity to ethylene blue, age younger than 15 years or older than 44 years at diagnosis, tumor more than 4 cm in greatest dimension and limited to the thyroid, or extending beyond the thyroid under ultrasound, or tumor in isthmus. Preoperative evaluation included history, complete physical examination, routine laboratory evaluation, including serum TSH measurement, ultrasound of thyroid and neck, including ipsilateral cervical lymph nodes, and chest x-ray. All patients underwent attempted SLN biopsy, followed by unilateral modified radical neck dissection.

SLN Biopsy

All surgeons had performed more than 20 SLN biopsies prior to the study, and had experience with thyroid SLN procedures. The day prior to the operation, lymphoscintigraphy was performed only for patients randomized to the combined procedure group. A single dose of 99 mTc sulfur colloid (~0.5 ml) was injected in the primary tumor for lymphoscintigraphy and intraoperative lymph node detection. Ten to 15 minutes after injection, dynamic images were detected by single photon emission computed tomography (PHILIPS Vertex V60, USA) to visualize lymphatic drainage. The position of the sentinel node was marked on the skin overlying the "hot spots" [23]. The operation was performed within 24 h after lymphoscintigraphy. After induction anesthesia, a standard transverse cervical incision was made, cutaneous flaps developed, and strap muscles retracted laterally. The thyroid lobe containing the tumor was exposed, dividing the medial thyroid vein and the upper pedicle. Both parathyroid glands were identified. Approximately 1.0 mL of 1% methylene blue was administered into the primary tumor with a 26-gauge needle. Care was taken not to stain surrounding tissue with blue dye. The thyroid gland was replaced in its normal position, and gentle massage was applied for 3 minutes. A combination of lymphoscintigraphy, blue lymph vessel and blue node identification, and a hand-held probe were used for tracing to the SLN. An SLN was defined as any blue node, or any node that could be identified as substantially radioactive above background activity. A specific SLN-to-background ratio was more than two for defining an SLN [24]. After the first radioactive SLN was removed, any node containing radioactive counts ≥ 10% of the ex vivo count of the most radioactive SLN was considered to be an additional SLN. The SLN was excised and radioactivity measured ex vivo to confirm nodal activity. After the SLN was removed, a central lymphadenectomy, unilateral total lobectomy and modified radical neck dissection were completed. Lymph nodes, including SLN, were sectioned along the long axis into two sections and then submitted for routine hematoxylin-eosin (H-E) staining. Each tissue block was sectioned serially. Location of positive lymph nodes (pN+) was recorded according to the Neck Dissection Classification update (revisions proposed by American Head and Neck Society and American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery [25]).

Statistical Analysis

Results of SLN biopsy were quantified using the following definitions: accuracy = (true positive + true negative)/(total patients); sensitivity = (true positive)/(true positive + false negative); and specificity = (true negative)/(true negative + false positive). All data were statistically analyzed using chi-squared test. Fisher's exact test was used for comparison, if necessary. All statistical tests were two-sided and P < 0.05 was considered significant. All statistical analyses were performed with SPSS statistical software package 15.0.


Between January 2004 to January 2007, 90 patients were enrolled and randomly divided into two groups. Mean age was 35.1 years (range, 23-44 years). Mean tumor size was 1.3 cm (range, 0.8-3.7 cm). Fifty-two percent of tumors were localized to the right lobe, 48% to the left. The incidence of positive lymph nodes was 65.5%, successful identification of SLN 93.3%, false-negative rate 25.6%, and accuracy 88.1% (Table 1). SLN biopsy was performed using single-agent injection (methylene blue dye) in 45 and dual-agent injection (blue dye plus radioactive colloid) in 45 patients, respectively.
Table 1

Sentinel lymph node biopsy results


Number of patients (%)


methylene blue (n = 45)

dual-agent (n = 45)

In total (n = 84)

Overall success in identification of SLN

39 (86.7%)

45 (100%)

84 (93.3%)

Mean No. of SLN in identified (range)

2.7 (1-7)

5.4 (3-10)


No. of patients with positive SLN

21 (53.8%)

24 (53.3%)

45 (53.6%)

No. of patients with negative SLN

18 (46.2%)

21 (46.7%)

39 (46.4%)

Mean No. of lymph nodes examined




No. of patients with positive lymph nodes



55 (65.5%)

Positive lymph nodes only in NSLN



10 (20.0%)

False negative rate








Comparison of the results using single- or dual-agent injection is listed in Table 1. In the methylene blue group, SLNs were identified in 39 of 45 patients (success rate = 86.7%). Of the 39, 28 patients (71.8%) had positive cervical lymph nodes (pN+). Of the 28 with positive cervical nodes, 7(25%) had metastases detected only in non-positive SLNs, thus giving a false-negative rate of 38.9%, a negative predictive value of 61.1% (11/18), and an accuracy rate of 82.1% (32/39).

In the combined technique group, SLN detection rate was 100% (45/45), with 27 of 45 patients (60.0%) having pN+, thus giving a false-negative rate of 14.3%, a negative predictive value of 85.7% (18/21), and an accuracy of 93.3% (42/45) [Table 1].

No positive lymph nodes in levels I or V were identified in the 84 patients. In one patient (1.2%), the pN was located in level II, in 6 patients (7.2%) in level III, in 8 patients (9.5%) in levels III and IV, in 8 patients (9.5%) in level IV, and in 32 patients (38.1%) in level VI.


Recent developments in SLN concept and technology have resulted in the application of this approach to define the first draining site or SLN to which a cancer may have metastasized [26, 27]. The underlying thesis in solid tumor biology is that metastasis generally begins with an orderly progression, spreading through the lymphatic channels to the SLN that should be reflected in the pathological status of the subsequent lymph nodes. Thus, the purpose of a SLN biopsy is not to improve survival, since that has not been clearly demonstrated, but to obtain diagnostic and prognostic information in order to help select systemic therapy. With the possibility of systemic disease, prognosis can only be improved by the addition of adjuvant therapy. To some extent the degree of possibility is determined by the presence or absence of regional nodal involvement.

The SLN technique is currently mainly used in surgery for breast cancer and melanoma, although its use is increasing in other solid tumors [3, 4, 6], including PTC [7, 8]. The SLN procedure has proven to be a valuable surgical adjunct and has become the standard for the surgical approach in the axillary staging of early-stage breast cancer, helping avoid unnecessary dissection in up to 75% of early-stage breast cancers [9]. Adjuvant chemotherapy regimen and whether adjuvant radiotherapy should or should not be given are related to the number of ALN involved [28]. Thus, accurate assessment of ALN status by ALN dissection is important, not only for staging and prognosis, but also for guiding treatment selection, when SLN biopsy is positive [29].

Different types of solid tumors have different patterns and biology of lymph node metastases [30]. In most other solid tumors, if the recurrence risk is high, more aggressive treatment may be warranted because the absolute reduction in the risk of recurrence is larger, thus offsetting disadvantages related to more aggressive treatment and improving the benefit-risk ratio. However, in the case of PTC, the generally favorable disease biology seems to make the extent of operation performed less important. PTC in younger "low risk" patients have a pattern of frequent (75%) regional nodal metastases when nodal resections are performed, but uncommonly (< 3%) have distant metastases, which are almost entirely confined to the lung when they occur, and a 99% disease-free survival rate at 20 years after treatment [31]. This unique clinical situation of very frequent nodal metastases but excellent survival suggests the use of SLN examination in younger patients with low-risk PTC [32]. Presently, as to the surgical options for PTC with gross lymph nodes involvement, there is no debate about the need for a radical neck dissection for prevention of local recurrence and systemic metastases [33]. The current controversy in the management of occult lymph node metastases in PTC revolves around the clinical contrast between the rather high incidence of metastases in patients with clinically occult nodes (50-80%), with a neck recurrence rate ranging from 1.4 to 30%, yet a 5-year mortality rate ranging from 0.9 to 17% when routine nodal dissection is not performed [34, 35]. Moreover, the greatest complications occurring after a neck dissection is a 25% incidence of postoperative shoulder dysfunction among patients who underwent a lateral neck dissection [36], neck numbness or neuropathic pain [37, 38], and other postoperative sequelae [3639]. Further, the increasing use of preoperative ultrasound conceivably decreases the number of clinically node-negative patients [40]. Finally, life-long TSH-suppressive doses of exogenous L-thyroxin after operation are felt to improve the prognosis of patients with occult metastasis. For these reasons, for clinically node-negative patients with PTC, knowledge of the presence or absence of lymphatic metastases may be of only interest in the staging procedure. However, if the SLN examination is negative, it would seem worthwhile not to have to perform further cervical node evaluation. Our results suggest that the dual SLN procedure would best accomplish this.

The previous studies of the efficacy of SLN biopsy in thyroid cancer seldom segregated different subpopulation in different tumor types so as not to produce more focused finding for discrete subpopulation, which may in reality exhibit different biological behaviors. Moreover, we hypothesized that the combination of the blue-dye method and lymphoscintigraphy/gamma probe techniques can have complementary roles and overcome some limits (such as retrieval of SLN outside the central compartment) to increase the possibility of identification of SLN. Thus, our study is, to the best of our knowledge, the largest comparative analysis of two techniques of SLN biopsy for younger female patients with ipsilateral low-risk PTC (T1-2N0M0) in Chinese population. In consistence with previous reports of 21% to 82% in patients without gross evidence of cervical lymph node involvement [15], the incidence in this study was 71.8% in methylene blue group, 60.0% in dual-agent group, and 65.5% in all patients. It demonstrated the feasibility of both procedures of SLN with identification rate of 86.7% for methylene blue only, 100% for dual-agent technique, and 93.3% for all, with accuracy rate of 82.1% for methylene blue only, 93.3% for dual-agent technique, and 88.1% for all (Table 1). This was consistence with the average rate of SLN identification with 83% (range,65%-95%) for blue dye and 96% (range,77%-100%) for 99 m Technetium, and accuracy rate in most patients (range, 80%-100%) [7, 8, 1020, 35]. A consensus had been reached that using the 99 m Technetium-labeled colloid technique yielded better detection rate of nodal metastases (P = 0.035). Hence, for institutions considering the application of SLN biopsy in low-risk patients with PTC, the combining use of Technetium-99 m for SLN detection offers a potentially higher success rate in identifying SLN. The use of blue dye technique only for SLN detection may be less successful due to transport of the blue dye to the parathyroid glands or prophylactic parathyroid identification resulting the detrimental effect of inevitable perithyroidal tissue dissection and/or minimal thyroid mobilization on the integrity of the lymphatic drainage before injection.

The false-negative rate (FNR) is the single most important quality item for the SLN technique. If a negative SLN biopsy could not definitively exclude the presence of positive basin lymph nodes, it adds no further staging information. High numbers of false-negative SLN would render the specific technique unsuitable for routine practice. In the present study, the FNR of the blue dye technique of SLN is 38.9% and 14.3% for dual-agent technique. The higher FNR of the blue dye technique in my study may due to the small size of the primary tumor and low-risk of patients having more SLN lying outside the central compartment (35.6% outside the central compartment). The FNR of methylene blue only was higher than it of dual-agent technique, though the difference did not reach significance. This may be related to the fairly small number of cases studied. There were little data regarding the FNR for SLN, previous trials reported a FNR of 11.3% for use of Technetium-99 m [20] and 10.0%-17.9%for the blue dye technique [12, 13, 15, 16]. In early-breast cancer, the American Society of Breast Surgeons recommends a rate of SLN identification of 85% with a false-negative rate of 5% or less in order to abandon axillary dissection [29]. Hence, Regardless of the acceptable identification rate of SLN by whichever of the both procedures was adopted, high FNR renders considering further improvement in the SLN technique for this subpopulation before a routine application. It could not exclude the possibility that PTC cells may more likely escape from the first draining lymph node of and metastasize to other lymph nodes (skip metastases) as gastric carcinoma of 20-30% and thoracic esophagus cancer of 50-60%[4143], because of different patents and biology of lymph node metastasis. More studies should investigate the technical aspects of harvesting the SLN. Novel methods for SLN detection are currently under investigation, as are the use of MR lymphangiography and carbon dye labeling [44]. Furthermore, it still remains uncertain how best to handle the SLN. The intraoperative examination (frozen-section analysis) and the routing pathologic assessment of SLN can underestimate the true incidence of metastasis [43]. False-negative SLNs may contain tiny deposits of microscopic metastatic disease but these may not be caught in the examined histologic slides. Serial sections, immunohistochemical stains [45] and molecular marker assays (based on the reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction technique) increase the detection rate of SLN metastases and could identifying micrometastases [46].


In our study, comparing to blue dye for younger female patients with ipsilateral low-risk PTC (T1-2N0M0), the combined technique of SLN biopsy could help more accurate lymph node staging and better identification of SLN located out of the central compartment. Regardless of the acceptable identification rate of SLN by whichever of the both procedures was adopted, high FNR renders the SLN technique unsuitable for routing practice; Prophylactic node dissection of level VI might be considered rather than routine practice for patients who did not had SLN biopsy, where only 38.1% of patients had node metastasis.




We thank Professor David Garfield for correcting the language of this paper, and all the surgeons, radiologists, oncologists, pathologists and nursed who contributed.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University
Department of Surgical Oncology, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical College
Department of Surgical Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical College


  1. Noguchi S, Murakami N, Yamashita H, Toda M, Kawamoto H: Papillary thyroid carcinoma: modified radical neck dissection improves prognosis. Arch Surg. 1998, 133 (3): 276-280. 10.1001/archsurg.133.3.276.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Pijpers R, Meijer S, Hoekstra OS, Collet GJ, Comans EF, Boom RP, van Diest PJ, Teule GJ: Impact of lymphoscintigraphy on sentinel node identification with technetium-99 m-colloidal albumin in breast cancer. J Nucl Med. 1997, 38 (3): 366-368.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Borgstein PJ, Pijpers R, Comans EF, van Diest PJ, Boom RP, Meijer S: Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer: guidelines and pitfalls of lymphoscintigraphy and gamma probe detection. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 1998, 186 (3): 275-283. 10.1016/S1072-7515(98)00011-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Pijpers R, Collet GJ, Meijer S, Hoekstra OS: The impact of dynamic lymphoscintigraphy and gamma probe guidance on sentinel node biopsy in melanoma. European journal of nuclear medicine. 1995, 22 (11): 1238-1241. 10.1007/BF00801606.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Pijpers R, Buist MR, van Lingen A, Dijkstra J, van Diest PJ, Teule GJ, Kenemans P, Verheijen RH: The sentinel node in cervical cancer: scintigraphy and laparoscopic gamma probe-guided biopsy. European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging. 2004, 31 (11): 1479-1486. 10.1007/s00259-004-1563-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Wydra D, Sawicki S, Bandurski T: The sentinel node in cervical cancer: scintigraphy and laparoscopic gamma probe-guided biopsy. European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging. 2005, 32 (6): 720-721. 10.1007/s00259-005-1765-4. author reply 722View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Dixon E, McKinnon JG, Pasieka JL: Feasibility of sentinel lymph node biopsy and lymphatic mapping in nodular thyroid neoplasms. World journal of surgery. 2000, 24 (11): 1396-1401. 10.1007/s002680010231.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Stoeckli SJ, Pfaltz M, Steinert H, Schmid S: Sentinel lymph node biopsy in thyroid tumors: a pilot study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2003, 260 (7): 364-368. 10.1007/s00405-003-0594-y.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Schwartz GF, Giuliano AE, Veronesi U: Proceedings of the consensus conference on the role of sentinel lymph node biopsy in carcinoma of the breast, April 19-22, 2001, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Cancer. 2002, 94 (10): 2542-2551. 10.1002/cncr.10539.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Kelemen PR, Van Herle AJ, Giuliano AE: Sentinel lymphadenectomy in thyroid malignant neoplasms. Arch Surg. 1998, 133 (3): 288-292. 10.1001/archsurg.133.3.288.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Haigh PI, Giuliano AE: Sentinel lymph node dissection for thyroid malignancy. Recent results in cancer research Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. 2000, 157: 201-205. 10.1007/978-3-642-57151-0_17.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Arch-Ferrer J, Velazquez D, Fajardo R, Gamboa-Dominguez A, Herrera MF: Accuracy of sentinel lymph node in papillary thyroid carcinoma. Surgery. 2001, 130 (6): 907-913. 10.1067/msy.2001.118372.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Fukui Y, Yamakawa T, Taniki T, Numoto S, Miki H, Monden Y: Sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma. Cancer. 2001, 92 (11): 2868-2874. 10.1002/1097-0142(20011201)92:11<2868::AID-CNCR10129>3.0.CO;2-I.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Pelizzo MR, Boschin IM, Toniato A, Bernante P, Piotto A, Rinaldo A, Ferlito A: The sentinel node procedure with Patent Blue V dye in the surgical treatment of papillary thyroid carcinoma. Acta oto-laryngologica. 2001, 121 (3): 421-424. 10.1080/000164801300103012.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Tsugawa K, Ohnishi I, Nakamura M, Miwa K, Yokoyama K, Michigishi T, Noguchi M, Nonomura A: Intraoperative lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with papillary carcinoma of the thyroid gland. Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie. 2002, 56 (Suppl 1): 100s-103s.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Takami H, Sasaki K, Ikeda Y, Tajima G, Kameyama K: Detection of sentinel lymph nodes in patients with papillary thyroid cancer. Asian journal of surgery/Asian Surgical Association. 2003, 26 (3): 145-148.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Chow TL, Lim BH, Kwok SP: Sentinel lymph node dissection in papillary thyroid carcinoma. ANZ journal of surgery. 2004, 74 (1-2): 10-12. 10.1046/j.1445-1433.2003.02677.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Dzodic R, Markovic I, Inic M, Jokic N, Djurisic I, Zegarac M, Pupic G, Milovanovic Z, Jovic V, Jovanovic N: Sentinel lymph node biopsy may be used to support the decision to perform modified radical neck dissection in differentiated thyroid carcinoma. World journal of surgery. 2006, 30 (5): 841-846. 10.1007/s00268-005-0298-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Pelizzo MR, Merante Boschin I, Toniato A, Piotto A, Bernante P, Paggetta C, De Salvo GL, Carpi A, Rubello D, Casara D: Sentinel node mapping and biopsy in thyroid cancer: a surgical perspective. Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie. 2006, 60 (8): 405-408.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Carcoforo P, Feggi L, Trasforini G, Lanzara S, Sortini D, Zulian V, Pansini GC, Degli Uberti E, Liboni A: Use of preoperative lymphoscintigraphy and intraoperative gamma-probe detection for identification of the sentinel lymph node in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2007, 33 (9): 1075-1080.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Sahin M, Yapici O, Dervisoglu A, Basoglu T, Canbaz F, Albayrak S, Citak A: Evaluation of lymphatic drainage of cold thyroid nodules with intratumoral injection of Tc-99 m nanocolloid. Clinical nuclear medicine. 2001, 26 (7): 602-605. 10.1097/00003072-200107000-00004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Sherman SI, Brierley JD, Sperling M, Ain KB, Bigos ST, Cooper DS, Haugen BR, Ho M, Klein I, Ladenson PW, et al: Prospective multicenter study of thyrois]carcinoma treatment: initial analysis of staging and outcome. National Thyroid Cancer Treatment Cooperative Study Registry Group. Cancer. 1998, 83 (5): 1012-1021.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Alex JC: The application of sentinel node radiolocalization to solid tumors of the head and neck: a 10-year experience. The Laryngoscope. 2004, 114 (1): 2-19. 10.1097/00005537-200401000-00002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Catarci M, Zaraca F, Angeloni R, Mancini B, de Filippo MG, Massa R, Carboni M, Pasquini G: Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy and sentinel lymph node biopsy in papillary thyroid cancer. A pilot study. Journal of surgical oncology. 2001, 77 (1): 21-24. 10.1002/jso.1058. discussion 25View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Robbins KT, Clayman G, Levine PA, Medina J, Sessions R, Shaha A, Som P, Wolf GT: Neck dissection classification update: revisions proposed by the American Head and Neck Society and the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery. 2002, 128 (7): 751-758.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Morton DL, Hoon DS, Cochran AJ, Turner RR, Essner R, Takeuchi H, Wanek LA, Glass E, Foshag LJ, Hsueh EC, et al: Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy for early-stage melanoma: therapeutic utility and implications of nodal microanatomy and molecular staging for improving the accuracy of detection of nodal micrometastases. Annals of surgery. 2003, 238 (4): 538-549. discussion 549-550PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Leong SP: Sentinel lymph node mapping and selective lymphadenectomy: the standard of care for melanoma. Current treatment options in oncology. 2004, 5 (3): 185-194. 10.1007/s11864-004-0010-x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Goldhirsch A, Wood WC, Gelber RD, Coates AS, Thurlimann B, Senn HJ: Progress and promise: highlights of the international expert consensus on the primary therapy of early breast cancer 2007. Ann Oncol. 2007, 18 (7): 1133-1144. 10.1093/annonc/mdm271.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Lyman GH, Giuliano AE, Somerfield MR, Benson AB, Bodurka DC, Burstein HJ, Cochran AJ, Cody HS, Edge SB, Galper S, et al: American Society of Clinical Oncology guideline recommendations for sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005, 23 (30): 7703-7720. 10.1200/JCO.2005.08.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Leong SP, Cady B, Jablons DM, Garcia-Aguilar J, Reintgen D, Jakub J, Pendas S, Duhaime L, Cassell R, Gardner M, et al: Clinical patterns of metastasis. Cancer metastasis reviews. 2006, 25 (2): 221-232. 10.1007/s10555-006-8502-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Cady B: Presidential address: beyond risk groups--a new look at differentiated thyroid cancer. Surgery. 1998, 124 (6): 947-957. 10.1016/S0039-6060(98)70034-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Shaha A: Selective surgical management of well-differentiated thyroid cancer. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2008, 1138: 58-64. 10.1196/annals.1414.010.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Mirallie E, Visset J, Sagan C, Hamy A, Le Bodic MF, Paineau J: Localization of cervical node metastasis of papillary thyroid carcinoma. World journal of surgery. 1999, 23 (9): 970-973. 10.1007/s002689900609. discussion 973-974View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Lim RB, Wong JH: Sentinel lymphadenectomy in gynecologic and solid malignancies other than melanoma and breast cancer. The Surgical clinics of North America. 2000, 80 (6): 1787-1798. 10.1016/S0039-6109(05)70261-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Wiseman SM, Hicks WL, Chu QD, Rigual NR: Sentinel lymph node biopsy in staging of differentiated thyroid cancer: a critical review. Surgical oncology. 2002, 11 (3): 137-142. 10.1016/S0960-7404(02)00027-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Kupferman ME, Patterson DM, Mandel SJ, LiVolsi V, Weber RS: Safety of modified radical neck dissection for differentiated thyroid carcinoma. The Laryngoscope. 2004, 114 (3): 403-406. 10.1097/00005537-200403000-00002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Terrell JE, Welsh DE, Bradford CR, Chepeha DB, Esclamado RM, Hogikyan ND, Wolf GT: Pain, quality of life, and spinal accessory nerve status after neck dissection. The Laryngoscope. 2000, 110 (4): 620-626. 10.1097/00005537-200004000-00016.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Inoue H, Nibu K, Saito M, Otsuki N, Ishida H, Onitsuka T, Fujii T, Kawabata K, Saikawa M: Quality of life after neck dissection. Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery. 2006, 132 (6): 662-666. 10.1001/archotol.132.6.662.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Laverick S, Lowe D, Brown JS, Vaughan ED, Rogers SN: The impact of neck dissection on health-related quality of life. Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery. 2004, 130 (2): 149-154. 10.1001/archotol.130.2.149.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Grubbs EG, Evans DB: Role of lymph node dissection in primary surgery for thyroid cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2007, 5 (6): 623-630.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Kosaka T, Ueshige N, Sugaya J, Nakano Y, Akiyama T, Tomita F, Saito H, Kita I, Takashima S: Lymphatic routes of the stomach demonstrated by gastric carcinomas with solitary lymph node metastasis. Surgery today. 1999, 29 (8): 695-700. 10.1007/BF02482311.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Matsubara T, Ueda M, Kaisaki S, Kuroda J, Uchida C, Kokudo N, Takahashi T, Nakajima T, Yanagisawa A: Localization of initial lymph node metastasis from carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus. Cancer. 2000, 89 (9): 1869-1873. 10.1002/1097-0142(20001101)89:9<1869::AID-CNCR1>3.3.CO;2-E.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Fortunato L, Amini M, Farina M, Rapacchietta S, Costarelli L, Piro FR, Alessi G, Pompili P, Bianca S, Vitelli CE: Intraoperative examination of sentinel nodes in breast cancer: is the glass half full or half empty?. Annals of surgical oncology. 2004, 11 (11): 1005-1010. 10.1245/ASO.2004.12.005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Nason RW, Torchia MG, Morales CM, Thliveris J: Dynamic MR lymphangiography and carbon dye for sentinel lymph node detection: a solution for sentinel lymph node biopsy in mucosal head and neck cancer. Head & neck. 2005, 27 (4): 333-338. 10.1002/hed.20173.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Weinberg ES, Dickson D, White L, Ahmad N, Patel J, Hakam A, Nicosia S, Dupont E, Furman B, Centeno B, et al: Cytokeratin staining for intraoperative evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes in patients with invasive lobular carcinoma. American journal of surgery. 2004, 188 (4): 419-422. 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2004.06.019.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Pitman KT, Ferlito A, Devaney KO, Shaha AR, Rinaldo A: Sentinel lymph node biopsy in head and neck cancer. Oral oncology. 2003, 39 (4): 343-349. 10.1016/S1368-8375(02)00086-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:


© Huang et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.