Quality of life assessment as a predictor of survival in non-small cell lung cancer
© Braun et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 27 October 2010
Accepted: 15 August 2011
Published: 15 August 2011
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|27 Oct 2010||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|29 Nov 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Richard Fielding|
|19 Dec 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - thida win|
|22 Dec 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Madelon Pijls-Johannesma|
|9 Jan 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Digant Gupta|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|9 Jan 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|21 Jan 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Richard Fielding|
|2 Feb 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Madelon Pijls-Johannesma|
|5 Aug 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Digant Gupta|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|5 Aug 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|15 Aug 2011||Editorially accepted|
|15 Aug 2011||Article published||10.1186/1471-2407-11-353|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.