Nottingham Prognostic Index in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: a reliable prognostic tool?
© Albergaria et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 4 April 2011
Accepted: 15 July 2011
Published: 15 July 2011
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|4 Apr 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|30 Apr 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Anna Sapino|
|6 Jun 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ian Ellis|
|28 Jun 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Fernando Schmitt|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|28 Jun 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|14 Jul 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Fernando Schmitt|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|14 Jul 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|15 Jul 2011||Editorially accepted|
|15 Jul 2011||Article published||10.1186/1471-2407-11-299|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.