Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Transcriptional activation of the Axl and PDGFR-α by c-Met through a ras- and Src-independent mechanism in human bladder cancer

  • Chen-Yun Yeh1,
  • Shin-Mei Shin1,
  • Hsuan-Heng Yeh3,
  • Tsung-Jung Wu2,
  • Jyh-Wei Shin4,
  • Tsuey-Yu Chang4,
  • Giri Raghavaraju1,
  • Chung-Ta Lee2,
  • Jung-Hsien Chiang5,
  • Vincent S Tseng5,
  • Yuan-Chii G Lee7,
  • Cheng-Huang Shen8,
  • Nan-Haw Chow2, 6 and
  • Hsiao-Sheng Liu1, 6Email author
Contributed equally
BMC Cancer201111:139

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-11-139

Received: 25 May 2010

Accepted: 16 April 2011

Published: 16 April 2011

Abstract

Background

A cross-talk between different receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) plays an important role in the pathogenesis of human cancers.

Methods

Both NIH-Met5 and T24-Met3 cell lines harboring an inducible human c-Met gene were established. C-Met-related RTKs were screened by RTK microarray analysis. The cross-talk of RTKs was demonstrated by Western blotting and confirmed by small interfering RNA (siRNA) silencing, followed by elucidation of the underlying mechanism. The impact of this cross-talk on biological function was demonstrated by Trans-well migration assay. Finally, the potential clinical importance was examined in a cohort of 65 cases of locally advanced and metastatic bladder cancer patients.

Results

A positive association of Axl or platelet-derived growth factor receptor-alpha (PDGFR-α) with c-Met expression was demonstrated at translational level, and confirmed by specific siRNA knock-down. The transactivation of c-Met on Axl or PDGFR-α in vitro was through a ras- and Src-independent activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase (MEK/ERK) pathway. In human bladder cancer, co-expression of these RTKs was associated with poor patient survival (p < 0.05), and overexpression of c-Met/Axl/PDGFR-α or c-Met alone showed the most significant correlation with poor survival (p < 0.01).

Conclusions

In addition to c-Met, the cross-talk with Axl and/or PDGFR-α also contributes to the progression of human bladder cancer. Evaluation of Axl and PDGFR-α expression status may identify a subset of c-Met-positive bladder cancer patients who may require co-targeting therapy.

Keywords

Axl PDGFR-α c-Met bladder cancer

Background

The RTK c-Met is expressed during normal development and plays a crucial role in many cell regulatory processes [1]. After binding to its cognate ligand-hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), activated c-Met transmits signals implicated in the cell proliferation, motility, survival, and morphogenesis [24]. C-Met is over-expressed and usually associated with metastatic progression of a variety of human malignant tumors, including bladder cancer [1, 5]. We have reported that c-Met is over-expressed in 32.3%, 63.2%, and 65.2% of superficial, locally advanced and metastatic bladder cancer, respectively [6]. Over-expression of c-Met is positively associated with muscle invasion and poor long term survival (p < 0.001), while it is not related to patient outcome in the subset of superficial bladder cancer. Miyata et al. also reported the significance of c-Met in bladder cancer development and as an important predictor of metastasis and patient survival [7]. Therefore, c-Met is emerging as a novel therapeutic target in many solid tumors [810].

Dimerization is generally required for activating RTKs [11]. In addition to heterodimeric complex formation of the same subfamily [6, 1114], heterologous RTK interaction is also involved in the pathogenesis of human cancers, e.g. between EGFR and RON (a member of the c-Met family) [15, 16]. The biological significance of inhibition of both RTK signaling pathways of cancer cells was demonstrated in the context of cell proliferation, migration, anti-apoptosis and transformation in vitro. [15]. Therefore, identification of cross-talk partners of c-Met involved in the tumorigenesis may provide important biomarkers for co-targeting therapy. In our prior RTK profiling experiment, c-Met was frequently co-expressed with Axl, platelet-derived growth factor receptor α (PDGFR-α), DDR2 and/or IGF1R in the same uroepithelial cells [17], suggesting the existence of yet unspecified cross-talk partners of c-Met.

Axl overexpression is detected in various human cancers, and is associated with invasiveness and/or metastasis of carcinoma of the breast [18], stomach [19], kidney [20], lung [21], and prostate [22]. High expression of PDGFR-α is also detected in a variety of tumors, such as prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, and carcinoma of the ovary, kidney, breast and liver [2326]. Furthermore, PDGFR-α expression provides additional predictive value related to breast cancer progression [23], and patient's survival in the kidney cancer [27] or lung cancer [28]. The implications of these two receptor-related signaling events in the bladder carcinogenesis, however, remain unclear. This study was aimed to identify the novel interaction partners of c-Met, investigate their regulation, effect on biological activity, and the potential significance in association with patient outcome.

Methods

Cell Lines, transfection, and stable cell line establishment

NIH/3T3 mouse fibroblast cell line and bladder cancer cell line T24 were obtained commercially. The four bladder cancer cell lines UB09: stage B2; UB40: stage A, papillary; UB47: stage B1; TSGH8301: stage A were established from patients of transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary tract [6, 29]. UB47 was cultured in RPMI medium 1640 supplemented with 15% fetal bovine serum (FBS). Other cell lines were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% FBS.

The plasmids pTRE-Met and pTet-Lac-Hyg were transfected into NIH/3T3 and T24 cells by Lipofectamine™ 2000 reagent according to manufacturer's protocol (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) [30]. Two stable cell lines: NIH-Met5 and T24-Met3 were established.

Microarray array

RNA was isolated using TRIzol reagent (GIBCO BRL, Gaithersburg, MD, USA), followed by mRNA purification using Oligotex™ mRNA kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA). RNA samples were reverse transcribed into cDNA fluorescently labeled either with Cy3 or with Cy5. The labeled cDNA was hybridized with a microarray cDNA chip containing 192 RTK genes [31]. Data were imported and normalized using MeV: MultiExperiment Viewer (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, http://www.tm4.org/mev.html) [32]. Clustering affinity search technique (CAST) was used for gene expression cluster analysis. There are 23 clusters after CAST analysis [33], the gene expression profiles of 8 genes showing the best correlation with c-Met gene were clustered as one group (table 1).
Table 1

The mRNA expression levels of eight RTK genes clustered together with c-Met in RTK c-DNA microarray analysis

RTK name

NIH/3T3

NIH-Met5 day 1

NIH-Met5 day 4

NIH-Met5 day 7

Axl

-0.43

1.48

-0.71

-0.34

ERBB2

-0.24

1.34

-1.07

-0.02

ERBB3

-0.34

1.47

-0.79

-0.35

Met

0.02

1.18

-1.26

0.06

MST1R

-0.35

1.45

-0.84

-0.26

PDGFRα

-0.40

1.48

-0.70

-0.38

PDGFRβ

-0.20

1.13

-1.25

0.32

TIE1

-0.24

1.47

-0.76

-0.47

TIE2

-0.01

1.38

-0.97

-0.40

Antibodies

Anti-phospho-tyrosine antibody was purchased from BD Transduction Laboratories (Lexington, KY, USA), and antibodies to Axl, c-Met, p-Met (phosphorylation of c-Met;Tyr 1234), PDGFR-α, and p-PDGFR-α (phosphorylation of PDGFR-α;Tyr 754) were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA, USA). The Ras antibody was obtained from Calbiochem (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), Sp1 from Upstate Biotechnology Inc. (Golden, CO, USA), p-Axl (phosphorylation of Axl;Tyr 702) from Cell Signaling Technology Inc. (Beverly, MA, USA) and β-actin was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). The Src antibody was obtained from Millipore (Billerica, MA, USA) and p-Src (phosphorylation of Src;Tyr 418) purchased from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA, USA).

Western blot analysis

The western blot analysis was performed as previously described [6]. Briefly, the total lysates were prepared using RIPA solution. Total protein (50 μg) was analyzed by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred to the PVDF membrane. The membrane was probed with targeted protein antibodies and the immune complex was detected with an enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) detection system (Perkin Elmer Life Sciences, USA).

siRNA transfection

Specific siRNA sense sequences were as follows: c-Met siRNA: 5`-AAGTGCAGTATCCTCTGACAG-3`, Axl siRNA: 5`-CGTGGAGAACAGCGAGATTTA-3`, and PDGFRα siRNA: 5`-CGAGACGATTGATGCAGGATA-3`. The cells (5 × 105) were seeded into a 6-cm cell culture dish and incubated in DMEM medium without antibiotics. Lipofectamine 2000 reagent (10 μl) was diluted in 500 μl of DMEM serum-free media and incubated for 5 min at RT. The siRNA was diluted in 500 μl of DMEM serum-free medium to the assigned concentrations. Mock transfection was conducted in parallel using distilled water as the negative control. Then cells were incubated at 37°C in the 5% CO2 incubator for 4 h. The media were replaced with normal media and cells were incubated for additional 48 h before protein extraction.

Trans-well migration assay

The effect of RTK cross-talk on cell migration was analyzed in TSGH8301 bladder cancer cells using a 24-well Transwell™ system (Corning inc., Lowell, MA). Briefly, cells were cultured in a 6-cm plate and transfected with c-Met, Axl, or PDGFR-α siRNA for 24 h, respectively. Then, cells were resuspended with serum-free medium and added into the upper chamber of the trans-well insert (2 × 105 cells/well). The 10% FBS-containing DMEM was added in the lower chamber. Cells were incubated h at 37°C for 36 h. Migrated cells were fixed with 4% formaldehyde in PBS and stained with 2% crystal violet in 2% ethanol. The non-migrated cells in the upper chamber were removed by wiping with a cotton swab. The cells on the lower surface of the filter, representing migration of the cells through the membrane, were counted under a light microscope.

Clinicopathological characteristics of study cases

Since c-Met is important in the progression of bladder cancer, both locally advanced and metastatic bladder tumors were recruited to evaluate the significance of co-expression patterns of c-Met and other RTKs. Archival material of 65 patients (44 men and 21 women; age range, 40 to 84 yr old; mean ± SD, 61.5 ± 9.4 yrs) with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial bladder cancer (21pT2, 27pT3, 17pT4) was analyzed for RTK expression. These patients were diagnosed and treated in the National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan, between 1990 and 1999 years. The numbers with low or high grade urothelial carcinoma were 20 and 45, respectively, according to definitions described previously [34]. Seven patients received partial cystectomy and remaining fifty-eight patients received radical cystectomy and bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection. Among them, 23 (35.4%) patients had pelvic lymph node involvement. An adjuvant systemic chemotherapy, including methotrexate, vinblastine, epirubicin, and cisplatin (M-VEC regimen), was given to 20 patients (30.8%) after radical cystectomy. The survival status was determined by outpatient clinic records and/or confirmed by interview with patients' families. Clinical follow-up ranged from 26 to 140 months (mean ± SD: 50.02 ± 6.46 months). The time of the first tumor recurrence and for disease specific survivals were counted. The time is calculated until the death of the patient due to bladder cancer. Patients who died of other causes or were still alive at the last follow-up were censored.

Immunohistochemical staining

Immunostaining procedures were described in detail previously [6]. Briefly, tissue sections were incubated at RT for 2 h with monoclonal anti-cMet (1:100 dilution; Santa Cruz), anti-AXL (1:10 dilution; Santa Cruz) and anti-PDGFR-α (1:200 dilution; Santa Cruz) antibodies raised against the membrane protein. The optimal dilution was determined by using human kidney as a positive control [5]. Then StrAviGen Super Sensitive MultiLink kit (BioGenex Laboratories, Inc., San Ramon, California) was used to detect the resulting immune complex. Peroxidase activity was visualized using an aminoethyl carbazole substrate kit (Zymed Laboratories, Inc., San Francisco, Califonia).

Because no apparent difference of staining intensity was detected, only the proportion of tumor cells stained for c-Met, Axl or PDGFR-α was considered in classification [6]. "High level of expression" indicates > 50% of the tumor cells were immunostained, "low level of expression" indicates 10%-50% reactivity; and "negative" indicates < 10% staining for RTK protein.

Statistical analysis

The association between tumor staging or gross characteristics with expression status of c-Met, Axl, and PDGFR-α was analyzed by Chi-square test as appropriate. The correlation between co-expression patterns of RTKs and disease-specific survival of cancer patients was constructed according to Kaplan-Meier method by Log rank test.

Results

Establishment of stable cell lines harboring inducible c-Met gene

Two stable cell lines, designated as NIH-Met5 (mouse fibroblast) and T24-Met3 (human bladder cancer cell), were established to harbor the inducible c-Met gene, which was expressed only in the absence of tetracycline (Tet) (Figure 1A, lane 3 and 4; Figure 1B, lane 1). When c-Met was over-expressed, the increase of its phosphorylated form (p-Met) indicates an auto-phosphorylation (Figure 1A, lane 3; Additional file 1, lane 6). Expression of p-Met was further enhanced 10 min after treatment with hepatocyte growth factor (HGF; Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) (Figure 1A, lane 4; Additional file 1, lane 7). In contrast, parental NIH/3T3 cells did not express c-Met and p-Met (Figure 1A, lanes 1 and 2; Additional file 1, lane4 1-4). It is interesting to note that c-Met or p-Met was not expressed in NIH-Met5 cells when treated with Tet alone or combined with HGF treatment (Figure 1A, lanes 5 and 6; Additional file 1, lanes 8-9). Concerning T24-Met3 cells, expression of c-Met was suppressed 24 h after treatment with Tet (Figure 1B, lane 2). Together, auto-phosphorylation occurred when c-Met was over-expressed, and HGF treatment further enhanced the phosphorylation of c-Met. The results demonstrate a successful in vitro model in modulating the expression of c-Met using Tet-off system.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2407-11-139/MediaObjects/12885_2010_Article_2639_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

c-Met expression in two stable cell lines in the presence or absence of Tet and/or HGF. The total cell lysate (100 μg) from the treated cell lines was initially precipitated by the phosphorylated tyrosine antibody (p-Tyr), and then blotted with c-Met antibody to evaluate the phosphorylation of c-Met. The expression level of c-Met protein was measured by Western blotting. β-actin was used as an internal control. The intensity of each band in the gel was quantified by densitometry analysis using VisionWorks™ LS image acquisition and analysis software (UVP, USA) and labeled under each band. A: Both NIH/3T3 and NIH-Met5 cells were treated with or without Tet for 24 h, and then replaced with HGF (30 ng/ml) for 10 min. B: The stable human bladder cancer cell line T24-Met3 was maintained in the medium in the presence or absence of Tet for 24 h.

Expression and functional association of c-Met with Axl and PDGFR-α in vitro

To identify the novel interaction partners of c-Met, NIH-Met5 cells were first treated with Tet for 24 h, and then cultured in the absence of Tet for an additional 4 and 7 days (Figure 2A), respectively. Total RNA was extracted and subjected to screening using a cDNA microarray as previously described [35]. Among 192 RTKs, a total of 8 genes were positively correlated with c-Met over-expression, including Axl, PDGFR-α, PDGFR-β, ERBB2, ERBB3, MST1R, TIE1 and TIE2 (table 1). One of these candidate genes-MST1R was recently reported in our laboratory [6]. In addition, co-expression of c-Met with Axl and/or PDGFR-α was also detected in our pilot molecular profiling of RTKs in human bladder cancer cells in vitro [16]. As a result, both Axl and PDGFR-α were chosen for subsequent analysis. The comparable expression patterns of c-Met, Axl and PDGFR-α at RNA level were shown in Figure 2A.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2407-11-139/MediaObjects/12885_2010_Article_2639_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

Expression of c-Met, phosphorylated c-Met, Axl and PDGFR-α in NIH/3T3 and NIH-Met5 cells in the presence or absence of tetracycline. A: A 192 RTK gene cDNA chip was used to screen the gene expression profiles which are positively correlated with c-Met in NIH/3T3 and inducible NIH-Met5 cell lines. A total of 8 RTK genes were shown to positively correlate with c-Met over-expression by CAST analysis (Methods). Only the gene expression profiles of c-Met, Axl and PDGFR-α are shown. NIH/3T3 (1D): the parental NIH/3T3 cell without Tet for 24 h; NIH-Met5 (1D): NIH-Met5 cell without Tet for 24 h; 4D: NIH-Met5 cell with Tet for 24 h followed by Tet-free treatment for another 4 days; 7D: NIH-Met5 cell with Tet for 24 h followed by Tet-free treatment for another 7 days. Relative expression level of each gene is obtained as compared with the common reference RNA [47] B: The expression levels of c-Met, p-Met, Axl and PDGFR-α were evaluated in NIH/3T3 and NIH-Met5 cells without Tet treatment (lanes 1 and 3), or after treatment for 24 h first and then replaced with Tet-free medium for additional 4 and 7 days, (lanes 4 and 5) by Western blotting. β-actin was used as an internal control. The numbers under each band represent the relative intensity.

The regulation was then examined at protein level in NIH-Met5 cells. As shown in figure 2B (lane 3), c-Met was overexpressed in the absence of Tet, while suppressed c-Met expression was demonstrated after treatment of Tet for 24 h, as with that of figure 1. A reversion of c-Met expression gradually appeared after removal of Tet for 4 and 7 days. Expression of c-Met became visible by day 4 and almost completely reversed by day 7 after removal of Tet (Figure 2B, lanes 4 and 5). The parental NIH/3T3 cells were used as a control (Figure 2B, lanes 1 and 2).

Using total c-Met and p-Met as the reference, expression of Axl and PDGFR-α showed a comparable trend to that of c-Met at day 4 and day 7 (Figure 2B, lanes 4 - 5), respectively. This positive association of Axl or PDGFR-α with c-Met expression was also demonstrated in T24-Met3 human bladder cancer cell line (Figure 1B). However, no difference of Axl and PDGFR-α expression was detected in NIH3T3 cells (Figure 2B, lanes 1 and 2). Taken together, expression patterns of total c-Met and p-Met were positively correlated with Axl and PDGFR-α expression, suggesting a functional relationship between Axl/PDGFR-α and c-Met.

Correlation of c-Met expression with Axl and PDGFR-α status in human bladder cancer cells

Both UB40 and UB47 are two bladder cancer cell lines established locally from primary bladder cancer of superficial and muscle-invasive type, respectively [6]. Apparent expression of c-Met and p-Met protein was detected in these two cell lines, and both Axl and PDGFR-α also showed a comparable expression pattern (Figure 3A). To confirm their functional interaction, these cell lines were maintained under serum starvation for 12 h, and then treated with HGF (30 ng/ml) for 10 min (Figure 3A). Up-regulation of Axl and PDGFR-α was demonstrated in UB40 and UB47 cells after HGF stimulation with a corresponding increase of p-Met (Figure 3A). Level of p-Met positively correlated with the expression of Axl and PDGFR-α, suggesting a relationship among c-Met, Axl and PDGFR-α.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2407-11-139/MediaObjects/12885_2010_Article_2639_Fig3_HTML.jpg
Figure 3

Validation of the transactivation of c-Met, Axl and PDGFR-α in human bladder cancer cells. A: Levels of c-Met, p-c-Met, Axl and PDGFR-α were measured in bladder cancer cell lines UB40 and UB47 by Western blotting after serum starvation for 24 h followed by HGF treatment for 10 min. B. c-Met, Axl and PDGFR-α protein expression was measured in UB40 cells after transfection with RTK-specific siRNAs (500 nM) by Western blotting. β-actin is a loading control. M: Mock transfection control. S: scramble siRNA (500 nM) is a negative control. The numbers under each band represent the relative intensity.

To clarify the interaction among c-Met, Axl and PDGFR-α, UB40 cancer cells were transfected with c-Met, Axl and PDGFR-α specific siRNAs at the optimal concentrations for 48 h. When expression of each receptor protein was suppressed by their specific siRNA, expression levels of the other two proteins showed a trend of down-regulation, with a higher correlation between c-Met and Axl (Figure 3B). However, co-immunoprecipitation assay did not reveal evidence of direct interaction among these three RTK proteins at cell membrane level (data not shown). Taken together, the above data demonstrate a cross-talk among c-Met, Axl and PDGFR-α in a protein-protein interaction independent manner in human bladder cancer cells.

The involvement of MEK/ERK signaling pathway in the transactivation of Axl and PDGFR-α by c-Met

There are several reports of signaling regulation about RTK transactivation. For example, a HGF-independent activation of c-Met by fibronectin was reported to promote the tumor invasion/metastasis [36]. Through binding to α5β1-integrin, fibronectin directly associates with c-Met and activates both Src and focal adhesion kinase activity. To clarify the potential involvement of this c-Met/Src-related signaling event, the Src inhibitor PP2 (Calbiochem, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) was used to treat serum starved UB40 cells for 24 h. As shown in Figure 4A, suppression of Src phosphorylation did not alter the levels of c-Met and Axl, indicating that Src is not involved in the cross-talk of the three RTKs.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2407-11-139/MediaObjects/12885_2010_Article_2639_Fig4_HTML.jpg
Figure 4

The involvement of signaling regulation in the cross-talk of RTKs in human bladder cancer cells. A: The UB40 cells were first pre-incubated with Src inhibitor (PP2) overnight. Then, phosphorylation status of Src, c-Met and Axl was evaluated after HGF stimulation for 10min. The PP3 (Calbiochem, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) was used as a negative control for Src inhibition. The numbers under each band represent the relative intensity. B: After serum-starvation, UB40 and UB47 cells were treated with FTI-277 or PD98059 for 1 h, and then with HGF for 24 h. The p-ERK and levels of Ras, ERK, Axl and PDGFR-α expression were measured using specific antibodies by Western blotting. β-actin was used as an internal control. M: Mock transfection control.

It is well known that MEK/ERK 1/2 is one of the most important transducer proteins when HGF binds to c-Met [1]. Both FTI-277 (a Ras farnesylation inhibitor; Calbiochem, San Diego, CA, USA) and PD98059 (a MEK 1 inhibitor; Cashmere Biotech Co., Taipei, Taiwan) were used to verify the involvement of MEK/ERK 1/2 signaling in c-Met-mediated activation of Axl and PDGFR-α. We showed that ERK phosphorylation was abrogated by PD98059 after HGF treatment for 24 h (Figure 4B, lanes 4 and 8) compared to FTI-277 (Figure 4B, lanes 3 and 7), suggesting the existence of a ras-independent phosphorylation of ERK mediated by HGF. The HGF-up-regulated Axl and PDGFR-α could be inhibited by PD98059 (Figure 4B, lanes 4 and 8), supporting the involvement of MEK/ERK 1/2 signaling in this transactivation event. In summary, MEK/ERK 1/2 signaling is involved in the transactivation of Axl and PDGFR-α by HGF/c-Met pathway in human bladder cancer cell lines, but is independent of ras or Src activity.

The effect of cross-talk of c-Met, Axl, and PDGFR-α on cell migration

Upon HGF stimulation, c-Met induces several biological responses that collectively give rise to a program known as "invasive growth". To clarify the biological relevance of cross-talk among c-Met, Axl and PDGFR-α, cell migration assay was conducted. The transwell experiment showed that migration of TSGH8301 bladder cancer cells was considerably suppressed by c-Met siRNA knock-down (p < 0.001). In addition, apparent inhibition was also demonstrated when shRNA for Axl or PDGFR-α alone was treated (p < 0.01) (Figure 5A and 5B). Figure 5C shows that the siRNA for c-Met and shRNAs for Axl and PDGFR-α,TSGH8301, indeed suppressed their target gene expression in TSGH8301 cells. This result is consistent with the reports on Axl in the breast [37] and liver cancers [38], and on the PDGFR-α in liver cancer [39], respectively. Our result suggests that c-Met, Axl and PDGFR-α may induce comparable biological functions, possibly through the same signaling pathway or inter-connecting signal network.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2407-11-139/MediaObjects/12885_2010_Article_2639_Fig5_HTML.jpg
Figure 5

The effect of c-Met, Axl and PDGFR-α expression on the migration of bladder cancer cells. (A) TSGH8301 bladder cancer cells (2 × 105 cells/200 μl DMEM) were plated in the upper chamber in the presence of 500 nM siRNA for c-Met, Axl and PDGFR-α, respectively, and analyzed for cell migration at 36 h. The filter was stained with 2% crystal violet, and the cells migrated to the opposite side of the filter were counted. (B) Quantification of (A). Data represents mean ± SD of three experiments. * *: p < 0.01, * * *: p < 0.001, by Student's t test. (C) The inhibitory effect of siRNA on c-Met, Axl and PDGFR-α expression was analyzed by Western blot analysis. Expression of c-Met, Axl and PDGFR-α was suppressed only in those cells transfected with c-Met, Axl or PDGFR-α siRNA/shRNA. There was no reduction of c-Met, Axl or PDGFR-α proteins in cells transfected with scrambled siRNA/shRNA. Ctrl: control treatment; S: scramble siRNA.

Clinical implication of c-Met, Axl, and PDGFR-α co-expression patterns in human bladder cancer patients

To clarify the clinical implication of the above-mentioned findings in vitro, expression levels of c-Met, Axl and PDGFR-α were examined by immunohistochemistry in a total of 65 cases of locally advanced and metastatic bladder tumors. Co-expression of c-Met/Axl/PDGFR-α in a case of a bladder cancer tissue was demonstrated in Figure 6. Collectively, overexpression of c-Met, Axl, and PDGFR-α was found in 30 (46.2%), 52 (80%), and 40 (61.5%) cases, respectively. Co-expression of two receptors was revealed in 22 (33.8%, c-Met/Axl), 27 (41.5%, c-Met/PDGFR-α), and 17 (26.2%, Axl/PDGFR-α) cases. Fourteen cases (21.5%) showed co-expression of three receptors (c-Met/Axl/PDGFR-α). In these human bladder tumors, over-expression of PDGFR-α was correlated with nodal metastasis and overexpression of c-Met or c-Met/Axl/PDGFR-α showed the most significant correlation with poor patient survival (p < 0.01) followed by c-Met/PDGFR-α, PDGFR-α, c-Met/Axl, and Axl/PDGFR-α (p < 0.05) (table 2). Kaplan Meier survival analysis showed that cumulative survival of patients with high expression of c-Met/Axl and c-Met/PDGFR-α was significantly lower than those with lower expression (Log rank test, p < 0.05) (Figure 7A and 7B). After adjusting for nodal status, multivariate analysis using log rank test revealed that indicators associated with poor long term survival were over-expression of c-Met and co-expression of c-Met/Axl/PDGFR-α (p = 0.015) (data not shown). We next used a Cox proportional hazards models to determine the relative risk (RR) of overall survival with 95% confidence interval (CI). The RR of poor long term survival was 3.340 for over-expression of c-Met, and 3.860 for co-expression of c-Met/Axl/PDGFR-α. Taken together, our results indicate that, in addition to c-Met, both Axl and PDGFR-α play a positive role in the progression of human bladder cancer.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2407-11-139/MediaObjects/12885_2010_Article_2639_Fig6_HTML.jpg
Figure 6

Co-expression of c-Met, Axl and PDGFR-α in a human bladder cancer specimen. Representative results of co-expression of c-Met, Axl and PDGFR-α in three serial sections of a human bladder cancer specimen. The three sections were incubated with anti-c-Met, anti-Axl or anti-PDGFR-α antibody, respectively (200X). The arrow indicates the specific expression of receptor protein around the membrane of the cancer cells.

Table 2

Correlation of c-Met, Axl, and PDGFR-α protein expression with clinicopathologic parameters of patients with locally advanced and metastatic bladder cancers

Expression pattern

Grade

T status*

Multiple

Node (+)

Survival

c-Met

0.561

0.904

0.727

0.321

0.009

Axl

0.409

0.105

0.795

0.300

0.789

PDGFR-α

0.344

0.470

0.718

0.049

0.027

c-Met & Axl

0.140

0.070

0.277

0.061

0.031

c-Met & PDGFR-α

0.184

0.686

0.957

0.802

0.011

Axl & PDGFR-α

0.439

0.585

0.762

0.369

0.049

c-Met & Axl & PDGFR-α

0.595

0.377

0.346

0.281

0.008

*Statistical analysis was performed between stage pT2 (21), pT3 (27) and stage pT4 (17), according to TNM (2002) classification criteria.

p value less than 0.05.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2407-11-139/MediaObjects/12885_2010_Article_2639_Fig7_HTML.jpg
Figure 7

Prognostic significance of co-expression of c-Met and Axl or PDGFR-α in human bladder cancer patients. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed that co-expression of c-Met/Axl (A) or c-Met/PDGFR-α (B) is significantly associated with poor survival in bladder cancer patients than those with single-receptor-positive or no receptor expression (p = 0.021 & 0.049, respectively).

Discussion and conclusions

In this study, we showed that both Axl and PDGFR-α have a functional interaction with c-Met in vitro and in vivo. This is the first report showing their potential clinical importance in human bladder cancer. The results concur with co-expression of c-Met/PDGFR-α in all of 9 human bladder cancer cell lines reported by Black and his colleagues [40]. The interaction between c-Met and Axl or PDGFR-α was further corroborated by HGF stimulation and siRNA silencing experiments in vitro. The interaction among these three RTKs may be initiated by protein-protein interaction or signaling transduction. The former possibility was excluded by co-immunoprecipitation assay (data not shown). In terms of signal regulation, the successful inhibition of c-Met activation by PD98059, but not by FTI-277 (ras inhibitor) or PP2 (Src inhibitor), suggests a ras- and Src-independent MEK/ERK 1/2 signaling in the transactivation of Axl and PDGFR-α. Our results seem to imply the existence of a novel mechanism by which c-Met transactivates the expression of Axl and PDGFR-α. Additional experiments are required to clarify whether protein kinase C is involved in this cross-talk in vivo.

Further support for our hypothesis of regulation at transcriptional level comes from several prior reports. The Sp1/Sp3 cis-acting elements were demonstrated to activate the promoter of Axl in various cancer cell lines [41]. Moreover, Sp1 response elements are detected in PDGFR-α promoter region [42, 43]. Given that c-Met induces the phosphorylation of Sp1 and enhances downstream gene expression through MEK/ERK signaling pathway [44, 45], c-Met might up-regulate the expression of Axl and PDGFR-α through Sp1. The dose-dependent suppression of Sp1, Axl and PDGFR-α by c-Met siRNA supports our speculation (Additional file 2).

It has been reported that HGF is expressed in fibroblast-like cells, smooth muscle cells, and endothelial cells of the bladder [46]. Expression of c-Met on the cancer cell surface thus may enable the paracrine activation in vivo, irrespective of their capability to synthesize HGF. The correlation of co-expression of two or three of the RTKs with patient survival supports the "invasive growth" program in carcinomas with multiple RTK over-expression [13, 15, 47]. The prognostic significance of c-Met, whether alone or co-expressed with Axl/PDGFR-α, supports the clinical relevance of c-Met-directed therapy (e.g. PHA665752) for human bladder cancer. Since the importance of co-targeting therapy for human bladder cancer having co-expressed RTKs has been demonstrated [15, 47], a prospective study is imperative to clarify the significance of Axl and/or PDGFR-α as an additional biomarker or implementation of MEK1/2 inhibitor in the design of c-Met-targeting therapy for human bladder cancer patients.

It is interesting to note that induction of Axl via ''kinase switching'' confers the Gleevec resistance in relapsed patients with c-Kit- or PDGFR-α-driven tumors of the gastrointestinal tract [48]. Therefore, evaluation of RTK expression profile in human cancer may provide signaling network information and help in prediction of potential drug resistance [49]. Olaussen et al. showed that combinations of tyrosine kinase inhibitors could induce a synergistic antitumor effect and thus improve the therapeutic efficacy [50]. When more highly selective or multi-target tyrosin kinase inhibitors become available, the discovery of co-expression of RTKs in cancer cells highlights the necessity for individualized therapies in the future.

Notes

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This project was supported by grants of Landmark Project Grant A25 of the National Cheng Kung University funded by the Ministry of Education in Taiwan, 96-2628-B-006-003-MY3 from the National Science Council; and NHRI-EX99-9930BI from the National Health Research Institutes, Taiwan. We thank Dr. R. Zuchini for critical reviewing this manuscript.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of microbiology and immunology, College of medicine, National Cheng Kung University
(2)
Department of pathology, College of medicine, National Cheng Kung University
(3)
Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, National Cheng Kung University
(4)
Department of parasitology, College of medicine, National Cheng Kung University
(5)
Department of computer science and information engineering, National Cheng Kung University
(6)
Center for gene regulation and signal transduction research, National Cheng Kung University
(7)
Graduate Institute of Medical Informatics, Taipei Medical University
(8)
Department of Urology, Chia-Yi Christian Hospital

References

  1. Stuart KA, Riordan SM, Lidder S, Crostella L, Williams R, Skouteris GG: Hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor-induced intracellular signalling. Int J Exp Pathol. 2000, 81 (1): 17-30. 10.1046/j.1365-2613.2000.00138.x.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Li B, Kanamaru H, Noriki S, Fukuda M, Okada K: Differential expression of hepatocyte growth factor in papillary and nodular tumors of the bladder. Int J Urol. 1998, 5 (5): 436-440. 10.1111/j.1442-2042.1998.tb00383.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Peschard P, Park M: From Tpr-Met to Met, tumorigenesis and tubes. Oncogene. 2007, 26 (9): 1276-1285. 10.1038/sj.onc.1210201.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Wang R, Ferrell LD, Faouzi S, Maher JJ, Bishop JM: Activation of the Met receptor by cell attachment induces and sustains hepatocellular carcinomas in transgenic mice. J Cell Biol. 2001, 153 (5): 1023-1034. 10.1083/jcb.153.5.1023.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Cheng HL, Trink B, Tzai TS, Liu HS, Chan SH, Ho CL, Sidransky D, Chow NH: Overexpression of c-met as a prognostic indicator for transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder: a comparison with p53 nuclear accumulation. J Clin Oncol. 2002, 20 (6): 1544-1550. 10.1200/JCO.20.6.1544.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Cheng HL, Liu HS, Lin YJ, Chen HH, Hsu PY, Chang TY, Ho CL, Tzai TS, Chow NH: Co-expression of RON and MET is a prognostic indicator for patients with transitional-cell carcinoma of the bladder. Br J Cancer. 2005, 92 (10): 1906-1914. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602593.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Miyata Y, Sagara Y, Kanda S, Hayashi T, Kanetake H: Phosphorylated hepatocyte growth factor receptor/c-Met is associated with tumor growth and prognosis in patients with bladder cancer: correlation with matrix metalloproteinase-2 and -7 and E-cadherin. Hum Pathol. 2009, 40 (4): 496-504. 10.1016/j.humpath.2008.09.011.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Capdeville R, Buchdunger E, Zimmermann J, Matter A: Glivec (STI571, imatinib), a rationally developed, targeted anticancer drug. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2002, 1 (7): 493-502. 10.1038/nrd839.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Dussault I, Bellon SF: From concept to reality: the long road to c-Met and RON receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors for the treatment of cancer. Anticancer Agents Med Chem. 2009, 9 (2): 221-229.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Puri N, Khramtsov A, Ahmed S, Nallasura V, Hetzel JT, Jagadeeswaran R, Karczmar G, Salgia R: A selective small molecule inhibitor of c-Met, PHA665752, inhibits tumorigenicity and angiogenesis in mouse lung cancer xenografts. Cancer Res. 2007, 67 (8): 3529-3534. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-4416.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Heldin CH: Dimerization of cell surface receptors in signal transduction. Cell. 1995, 80 (2): 213-223. 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90404-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Chen Q, Seol DW, Carr B, Zarnegar R: Co-expression and regulation of Met and Ron proto-oncogenes in human hepatocellular carcinoma tissues and cell lines. Hepatology. 1997, 26 (1): 59-66.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Chow NH, Chan SH, Tzai TS, Ho CL, Liu HS: Expression profiles of ErbB family receptors and prognosis in primary transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder. Clin Cancer Res. 2001, 7 (7): 1957-1962.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Maggiora P, Lorenzato A, Fracchioli S, Costa B, Castagnaro M, Arisio R, Katsaros D, Massobrio M, Comoglio PM, Flavia Di Renzo M: The RON and MET oncogenes are co-expressed in human ovarian carcinomas and cooperate in activating invasiveness. Exp Cell Res. 2003, 288 (2): 382-389. 10.1016/S0014-4827(03)00250-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Hsu PY, Liu HS, Cheng HL, Tzai TS, Guo HR, Ho CL, Chow NH: Collaboration of RON and epidermal growth factor receptor in human bladder carcinogenesis. J Urol. 2006, 176 (5): 2262-2267. 10.1016/j.juro.2006.07.048.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Jo M, Stolz DB, Esplen JE, Dorko K, Michalopoulos GK, Strom SC: Cross-talk between epidermal growth factor receptor and c-Met signal pathways in transformed cells. J Biol Chem. 2000, 275 (12): 8806-8811. 10.1074/jbc.275.12.8806.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Chow NH, Trink B, Eisenberger C, Sidransky D: Tyrosine kinase profile of bladder cancer. J Urol. 1998, 159: 1096-Google Scholar
  18. Meric F, Lee WP, Sahin A, Zhang H, Kung HJ, Hung MC: Expression profile of tyrosine kinases in breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2002, 8 (2): 361-367.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Wu CW, Li AF, Chi CW, Lai CH, Huang CL, Lo SS, Lui WY, Lin WC: Clinical significance of AXL kinase family in gastric cancer. Anticancer Res. 2002, 22 (2B): 1071-1078.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Chung BI, Malkowicz SB, Nguyen TB, Libertino JA, McGarvey TW: Expression of the proto-oncogene Axl in renal cell carcinoma. DNA Cell Biol. 2003, 22 (8): 533-540. 10.1089/10445490360708946.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Shieh YS, Lai CY, Kao YR, Shiah SG, Chu YW, Lee HS, Wu CW: Expression of axl in lung adenocarcinoma and correlation with tumor progression. Neoplasia. 2005, 7 (12): 1058-1064. 10.1593/neo.05640.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Sainaghi PP, Castello L, Bergamasco L, Galletti M, Bellosta P, Avanzi GC: Gas6 induces proliferation in prostate carcinoma cell lines expressing the Axl receptor. J Cell Physiol. 2005, 204 (1): 36-44. 10.1002/jcp.20265.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Carvalho I, Milanezi F, Martins A, Reis RM, Schmitt F: Overexpression of platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha in breast cancer is associated with tumour progression. Breast Cancer Res. 2005, 7 (5): R788-795. 10.1186/bcr1304.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Dabrow MB, Francesco MR, McBrearty FX, Caradonna S: The effects of platelet-derived growth factor and receptor on normal and neoplastic human ovarian surface epithelium. Gynecol Oncol. 1998, 71 (1): 29-37. 10.1006/gyno.1998.5121.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Fudge K, Bostwick DG, Stearns ME: Platelet-derived growth factor A and B chains and the alpha and beta receptors in prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia. Prostate. 1996, 29 (5): 282-286. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0045(199611)29:5<282::AID-PROS2>3.0.CO;2-C.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Stock P, Monga D, Tan X, Micsenyi A, Loizos N, Monga SP: Platelet-derived growth factor receptor-alpha: a novel therapeutic target in human hepatocellular cancer. Mol Cancer Ther. 2007, 6 (7): 1932-1941. 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-06-0720.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Tawfik OW, Kramer B, Shideler B, Danley M, Kimler BF, Holzbeierlein J: Prognostic significance of CD44, platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha, and cyclooxygenase 2 expression in renal cell carcinoma. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2007, 131 (2): 261-267.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Donnem T, Al-Saad S, Al-Shibli K, Andersen S, Busund LT, Bremnes RM: Prognostic impact of platelet-derived growth factors in non-small cell lung cancer tumor and stromal cells. J Thorac Oncol. 2008, 3 (9): 963-970. 10.1097/JTO.0b013e3181834f52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Lin YS, Su LJ, Yu CT, Wong FH, Yeh HH, Chen SL, Wu JC, Lin WJ, Shiue YL, Liu HS, et al: Gene expression profiles of the aurora family kinases. Gene Expr. 2006, 13 (1): 15-26. 10.3727/000000006783991962.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Chang TY, Wen YY, Yeh HH, Wang ST, Su IJ, Liu HS: Plasmid harboring lac repressor and tTA activator genes can regulate two inducible genes in mammalian cells. Biotechniques. 1999, 27 (3): 466-469.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Robinson DR, Wu YM, Lin SF: The protein tyrosine kinase family of the human genome. Oncogene. 2000, 19 (49): 5548-5557. 10.1038/sj.onc.1203957.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Novoradovskaya N, Whitfield ML, Basehore LS, Novoradovsky A, Pesich R, Usary J, Karaca M, Wong WK, Aprelikova O, Fero M, et al: Universal Reference RNA as a standard for microarray experiments. BMC Genomics. 2004, 5 (1): 20-10.1186/1471-2164-5-20.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Ben-Dor A, Shamir R, Yakhini Z: CAST - Clustering Affinity Search Technique. J Comput Biol. 1999, 6: 281-297. 10.1089/106652799318274.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Eble JNSG, Epstein JI, Sesterhenn IA, (Eds): Multilocular cystic renal cell carcinoma In: World Health Organization Classification of Tumours. Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of the Urinary System and Male Genital Organs. 2004, 26-
  35. Chen CC, Shieh B, Jin YT, Liau YE, Huang CH, Liou JT, Wu LW, Huang W, Young KC, Lai MD, et al: Microarray profiling of gene expression patterns in bladder tumor cells treated with genistein. J Biomed Sci. 2001, 8 (2): 214-222. 10.1007/BF02256415.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Mitra AK, Sawada K, Tiwari P, Mui K, Gwin K, Lengyel E: Ligand-independent activation of c-Met by fibronectin and alpha(5)beta(1)-integrin regulates ovarian cancer invasion and metastasis. Oncogene. 2010, 30 (13): 1566-1576. 10.1038/onc.2010.532.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Vuoriluoto K, Haugen H, Kiviluoto S, Mpindi JP, Nevo J, Gjerdrum C, Tiron C, Lorens JB, Ivaska J: Vimentin regulates EMT induction by Slug and oncogenic H-Ras and migration by governing Axl expression in breast cancer. Oncogene. 2010, 30 (12): 1436-1448. 10.1038/onc.2010.509.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. He L, Zhang J, Jiang L, Jin C, Zhao Y, Yang G, Jia L: Differential expression of Axl in hepatocellular carcinoma and correlation with tumor lymphatic metastasis. Mol Carcinog. 2010, 49 (10): 882-891. 10.1002/mc.20664.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Gotzmann J, Fischer AN, Zojer M, Mikula M, Proell V, Huber H, Jechlinger M, Waerner T, Weith A, Beug H, et al: A crucial function of PDGF in TGF-beta-mediated cancer progression of hepatocytes. Oncogene. 2006, 25 (22): 3170-3185. 10.1038/sj.onc.1209083.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Black PC, Brown GA, Inamoto T, Shrader M, Arora A, Siefker-Radtke AO, Adam L, Theodorescu D, Wu X, Munsell MF, et al: Sensitivity to epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor requires E-cadherin expression in urothelial carcinoma cells. Clin Cancer Res. 2008, 14 (5): 1478-1486. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-1593.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Mudduluru G, Allgayer H: The human receptor tyrosine kinase Axl gene--promoter characterization and regulation of constitutive expression by Sp1, Sp3 and CpG methylation. Biosci Rep. 2008, 28 (3): 161-176.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Bonello MR, Khachigian LM: Fibroblast growth factor-2 represses platelet-derived growth factor receptor-alpha (PDGFR-alpha) transcription via ERK1/2-dependent Sp1 phosphorylation and an atypical cis-acting element in the proximal PDGFR-alpha promoter. J Biol Chem. 2004, 279 (4): 2377-2382. 10.1074/jbc.M308254200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Kawagishi J, Kumabe T, Yoshimoto T, Yamamoto T: Structure, organization, and transcription units of the human alpha-platelet-derived growth factor receptor gene, PDGFRA. Genomics. 1995, 30 (2): 224-232. 10.1006/geno.1995.9883.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Paumelle R, Tulasne D, Kherrouche Z, Plaza S, Leroy C, Reveneau S, Vandenbunder B, Fafeur V: Hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor activates the ETS1 transcription factor by a RAS-RAF-MEK-ERK signaling pathway. Oncogene. 2002, 21 (15): 2309-2319. 10.1038/sj.onc.1205297.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Reisinger K, Kaufmann R, Gille J: Increased Sp1 phosphorylation as a mechanism of hepatocyte growth factor (HGF/SF)-induced vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF/VPF) transcription. J Cell Sci. 2003, 116 (Pt 2): 225-238. 10.1242/jcs.00237.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Joseph A, Weiss GH, Jin L, Fuchs A, Chowdhury S, O'Shaugnessy P, Goldberg ID, Rosen EM: Expression of scatter factor in human bladder carcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1995, 87 (5): 372-377. 10.1093/jnci/87.5.372.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Su LJ, Hsu SL, Yang JS, Tseng HH, Huang SF, Huang CY: Global gene expression profiling of dimethylnitrosamine-induced liver fibrosis: from pathological and biochemical data to microarray analysis. Gene Expr. 2006, 13 (2): 107-132. 10.3727/000000006783991872.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Mahadevan D, Cooke L, Riley C, Swart R, Simons B, Della Croce K, Wisner L, Iorio M, Shakalya K, Garewal H, et al: A novel tyrosine kinase switch is a mechanism of imatinib resistance in gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Oncogene. 2007, 26 (27): 3909-3919. 10.1038/sj.onc.1210173.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Rikova K, Guo A, Zeng Q, Possemato A, Yu J, Haack H, Nardone J, Lee K, Reeves C, Li Y, et al: Global survey of phosphotyrosine signaling identifies oncogenic kinases in lung cancer. Cell. 2007, 131 (6): 1190-1203. 10.1016/j.cell.2007.11.025.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Olaussen KA, Commo F, Tailler M, Lacroix L, Vitale I, Raza SQ, Richon C, Dessen P, Lazar V, Soria JC, et al: Synergistic proapoptotic effects of the two tyrosine kinase inhibitors pazopanib and lapatinib on multiple carcinoma cell lines. Oncogene. 2009, 28 (48): 4249-4260. 10.1038/onc.2009.277.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/11/139/prepub

Copyright

© Yeh et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.