Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Impact of maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) evaluated by 18-Fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG-PET/CT) on survival for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma: a preliminary report

  • Kazuhiro Namura1,
  • Ryogo Minamimoto2,
  • Masahiro Yao1, 5,
  • Kazuhide Makiyama1,
  • Takayuki Murakami1,
  • Futoshi Sano1,
  • Narihiko Hayashi1,
  • Ukihide Tateishi2,
  • Hanako Ishigaki3,
  • Takeshi Kishida3,
  • Takeshi Miura3,
  • Kazuki Kobayashi4,
  • Sumio Noguchi4,
  • Tomio Inoue2, 5,
  • Yoshinobu Kubota1, 5 and
  • Noboru Nakaigawa1, 5Email author
BMC Cancer201010:667

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-10-667

Received: 19 May 2010

Accepted: 3 December 2010

Published: 3 December 2010

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
19 May 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
22 May 2010 Author responded Author comments - Noboru Nakaigawa
Resubmission - Version 3
22 May 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
22 May 2010 Author responded Author comments - Noboru Nakaigawa
Resubmission - Version 4
22 May 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 4
22 May 2010 Author responded Author comments - Noboru Nakaigawa
Resubmission - Version 5
22 May 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 5
15 Aug 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Tina Binderup
23 Aug 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Koji Murakami
27 Sep 2010 Author responded Author comments - Noboru Nakaigawa
Resubmission - Version 6
27 Sep 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 6
14 Oct 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Koji Murakami
27 Oct 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Tina Binderup
24 Nov 2010 Author responded Author comments - Noboru Nakaigawa
Resubmission - Version 7
24 Nov 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 7
25 Nov 2010 Author responded Author comments - Noboru Nakaigawa
Resubmission - Version 8
25 Nov 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 8
Resubmission - Version 9
Submitted Manuscript version 9
29 Nov 2010 Author responded Author comments - Noboru Nakaigawa
Resubmission - Version 10
29 Nov 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 10
Publishing
3 Dec 2010 Editorially accepted
3 Dec 2010 Article published 10.1186/1471-2407-10-667

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Urology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine
(2)
Department of Radiology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine
(3)
Department of Urology, Kanagawa Cancer Center
(4)
Department of Urology, Yokosuka Kyosai Hospital
(5)
Advanced Medical Research Center, Yokohama City University

Advertisement