Skip to main content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Bladder metastases of appendiceal mucinous adenocarcinoma: a case presentation

  • Gianluigi Taverna1Email author,
  • Matteo Corinti1,
  • Piergiuseppe Colombo2,
  • Fabio Grizzi3,
  • Mauro Severo1,
  • Alessando Piccinelli1,
  • Guido Giusti1,
  • Alessio Benetti1,
  • Paolo A Zucali4 and
  • Pierpaolo Graziotti1
BMC Cancer201010:62

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-10-62

Received: 7 August 2009

Accepted: 23 February 2010

Published: 23 February 2010

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
7 Aug 2009 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
17 Nov 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Bernardino Rampone
18 Nov 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nikolaos Salemis
22 Nov 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alessandro Cois
4 Jan 2010 Author responded Author comments - Fabio Grizzi
Resubmission - Version 3
4 Jan 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
23 Feb 2010 Editorially accepted
23 Feb 2010 Article published 10.1186/1471-2407-10-62

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Urology
Department of Pathology
Laboratories of Quantitative Medicine
Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Clinico Humanitas