Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Clinicopathologic characteristics and prognostic factors of ovarian fibrosarcoma: the results of a multi-center retrospective study

Contributed equally
BMC Cancer201010:585

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-10-585

Received: 6 June 2010

Accepted: 27 October 2010

Published: 27 October 2010

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
6 Jun 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
28 Jul 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Murat Gultekin
5 Aug 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ardeshir Hakam
16 Sep 2010 Author responded Author comments - long huang
Resubmission - Version 3
16 Sep 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
24 Sep 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Murat Gultekin
26 Oct 2010 Author responded Author comments - long huang
Resubmission - Version 4
26 Oct 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
27 Oct 2010 Editorially accepted
27 Oct 2010 Article published 10.1186/1471-2407-10-585

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Gynecology, Cancer Center, Sun Yat-sen University
(2)
State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China
(3)
Guangdong Key Laboratory of Medical Molecular Imaging
(4)
Department of Radiology, First Affiliated Hospital, Medical College of Shantou University

Advertisement