Association of nutritional status and serum albumin levels with development of toxicity in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with paclitaxel-cisplatin chemotherapy: a prospective study
© Arrieta et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 17 July 2009
Accepted: 21 February 2010
Published: 21 February 2010
A frequent manifestation of advanced NSCLC is malnutrition, even though there are many studies which relate it with a poor survival, its relation with toxicity has not yet been consistently reported. The aim of this study was to associate malnutrition and albumin serum levels with the occurrence of chemotherapy-induced toxicity in cisplatin plus paclitaxel chemotherapy-treated NSCLC.
We prospectively evaluated 100 stage IV NSCLC patients treated with paclitaxel (175 mg/m2) and cisplatin (80 mg/m2). Malnutrition was assessed using SGA prior treatment. Neutrophil Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) and the Platelet Lymphocyte Ratio (PLR) were used to determine the presence of systemic inflammatory response (SIR) and were related to the development of toxicity. Toxicity was graded according to NCI CTCAE version 3.0 after two chemotherapy cycles.
Median age was 58 ± 10 years, 51% of patients were malnourished, 50% had albumin ≤3.0 mg/mL. NLR ≥ 5 was associated with basal hypoalbuminemia (mean ranks, 55.7 vs. 39 p = 0.006), ECOG = 2 (47.2 vs. 55.4 p = 0.026) and PLR ≥ 150 were significantly related with a basal body mass index ≤20 (56.6 vs. 43.5; p = 0.02) and hypoalbuminemia (58.9 vs. 41.3; p = 0.02). Main toxicities observed after 2 cycles of chemotherapy were alopecia (84%), nausea (49%), neuropathy (46%), anemia (33%), lymphopenia (31%), and leukopenia (30%). Patients malnourished and with hypoalbuminemia developed more chemotherapy-induced toxicity overall when compared with those without malnutrition (31 vs 22; p = 0.02) and normal albumin (mean ranks, 62 vs 43; p = 0.002), respectively. Hypoalbuminemia was associated with anemia (56 vs 47; p = 0.05), fatigue (58 vs 46; p = 0.01), and appetite loss (57.1 vs 46.7; p = 0.004) compared with normal albumin. PLR ≥ 150 was related with the development of toxicity grade III/IV (59.27 vs. 47.03 p = 0.008) and anemia (37.9 vs 53.8 p = 0.004).
SIR parameters were associated with malnutrition, weight loss and hypoalbuminemia. Chemotherapy-induced toxicity in NSCLC patients treated with paclitaxel and cisplatin was associated with malnutrition and hypoalbuminemia. Early nutritional assessment and support might confer beneficial effects.
Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is highly prevalent and the major cause of cancer-related deaths in the U.S., Mexico, and worldwide [1–3]. NSCLC represents approximately 80% of lung neoplasms. While surgery is the principal curative option, fewer than 20% of patients have resectable disease, permitting their being operated at time of diagnosis . Multiple studies have clearly shown that chemotherapy is important in the palliative care of advanced NSCLC, with objective tumor-response percentages of 25-35%; significant extension of overall survival has also been obtained when compared with the best support treatment. One of the most frequently employed first-line regimens consists of cisplatin (P) plus paclitaxel (TXN) .
P is widely used as part of the treatment of various malignant neoplasms, such as ovary, breast, lung, and head and neck cancer [6, 7]. Further improvements in survival have been achieved when it is combined with third-generation agents [8, 9]. TXN has the ability to block cells in the late G2 phase of the cell cycle by microtubule polymerization and stabilization . TXN is transported by binding with plasma proteins, such as albumin, the latter significant for its pharmacokinetic behavior; it is also extensively protein-bound (95-98%) to tissue proteins , and its removal is primarily carried out by hepatic metabolism .
Despite efforts to diminish treatment-related toxicity and to preserve or improve patients' quality of life (QOL), all combinations of platin and third-generation agents including their modifications maintain a percentage of adverse events . The most common hematologic adverse effects comprise leukopenia and anemia, while the most frequently found non-hematologic adverse reactions are nausea and vomiting. Peripheral neuropathy, arthralgias, myalgias, and dermatologic toxicity can be encountered less frequently, rendering dose reduction necessary [14–16].
The prevalence of malnutrition-associated morbidity in patients with cancer ranges from 40-80% . The process of nutritional and functional decline in the patient with cancer is so common that it is often accepted as part of the disease itself and its treatment. Currently, there is evidence that the presence of a systemic inflammatory response (SIR) is associated with increased weight loss, an elevated resting energy expenditure, loss of lean tissue and functional decline . Malnutrition is associated with a higher risk of developing complications and with mortality, sometimes lengthening the hospital stay by up to 90%, thus increasing hospitalization costs by 35-75% ; malnutrition is also related with a reduction in response [20, 21], hence influencing QOL of patients, their sense of well-being, and emotional aspects. Malnutrition is related with hypoalbuminemia, and both are common in patients with NSCLC , especially in non-developed countries, where malnutrition is prevalent in itself. Currently, there are certain clinical and biochemical measurements utilized in the nutritional evaluation of oncologic patients, such as the Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) , as well as the albumin serum levels, which reflects both the loss of the amount of lean tissue and systemic inflammatory response [18, 24–26]. Neutrophil Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) and the Platelet Lymphocyte Ratio (PLR) have also been demonstrated as indicators of systemic inflammatory response . Indeed, the magnitude of the increase PLR and NLR has been shown to be associated with poorer survival in patients with cancer, particularly in patients with advanced disease [27–30]. The aim of this study was to associate malnutrition and albumin serum levels with the occurrence of chemotherapy-induced toxicity in P plus TXN treated NSCLC.
With previous institutional research and ethics board approval, we conducted a prospective analytical study at the Instituto Nacional de Cancerología in Mexico City. All patients gave written informed consent. We evaluated 100 consecutive patients recently diagnosed with NSCLC who attended the Thorax Neoplasms Clinic from January 2007 to February 2009. Inclusion criteria were as follows: patients with a diagnosis of stage IV histopathological or cytological NSCLC, with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score of ≤2, aged 18-80 years, and eligibility to receive TXN (175 mg/m2) and P (80 mg/m2) based first-line palliative chemotherapy every 3 weeks for at least two cycles. Exclusion criteria included patients who declined participation in the study, who required biochemical or hematological alteration-related P or TXN dose reduction, who had poor functional state, those who had received previous treatment (surgical, radiotherapy, and/or chemotherapy), and patients with signs of infection, acute inflammatory processes, or liver disorders.
Prior to chemotherapy administration, clinical, biochemical, and nutritional evaluations by means of Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) were conducted. Initial values were collected in a database that also included patient characteristics. All patients received chemotherapy at the institution with the same premedication drugs (aprepitant day 1: 125 mg; 2nd and 3rd days, 80 mg PO, ondansetron 16 mg IV, dexamethasone 16 mg IV, chlorphenamine 10 mg IV, ranitidine hydrochloride 50 mg IV) and hydration.
The biochemical evaluation comprised complete blood count (including lymphocytes), blood chemistry (glucose, BUN, and creatinine), and liver function tests (AST, ALT, total and direct bilirubin, total proteins, albumin, and globulin). Venous blood samples were drawn from patients after an overnight fast. All laboratory values were determined using routine automated analyzers at the Department of Clinical Chemistry of the Instituto Nacional de Cancerología. Serum albumin levels were measured with the bromcresol purple method and employed as the biochemical marker of nutritional status: levels <3.5 mg/dL of albumin (hypoalbuminemia) were taken to indicate malnutrition; in addition, levels <3.8 mg/dL were considered for analysis, given that this is the lower limit used at the Institute. The NLR was defined as the absolute neutrophil count divided by the absolute lymphocyte count. The PLR was defined as the absolute platelet count divided by the absolute lymphocyte count. Both the NLR and PLR were calculated from the full blood count routinely performed one day before the first cycle of chemotherapy: NLR ≥5 and PLR ≥150 were taken to indicate SIR as previously described [18, 27–30].
Baseline nutritional status evaluation was performed by three Clinical Nutritionists (CNs) (KS, GS, and ST) and consisted of questionnaires utilized for detection of undernourishment, anorexia, hunger-satiety sensations, and SGA; the CNs were blinded to the toxicity evaluation. SGA consists of a brief nutritional history (weight loss during the last 6 months, dietary changes, and a short physical examination of subcutaneous fat, muscle mass, albumin serum levels and fluid balance). SGA classifies patients as having severe or moderate malnourishment, or being well-nourished.
The clinical evaluation included ECOG, weight, height, and body mass index (BMI). Body weight was measured, in light clothing and without shoes, to the nearest 0.10 kg. Height was measured to the nearest 0.5 cm. BMI was calculated as weight (kg)/height squared (m2). BMI <20 is widely accepted as indicating that the subject is underweight, particularly in well-developed countries, and 18.5 is recommended as a practical lower limit for the majority of populations. Therefore, a diagnosis of malnutrition was made when BMI was <18.5 kg/m2.
After two chemotherapy cycles were received, biochemical evaluation was repeated and signs and symptoms of toxicity were evaluated; these were graded according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria of Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) (version 3.0).
For descriptive purposes, continuous variables were summarized as arithmetic means, medians, and standard deviations (SDs), while categorical variables were expressed as proportions and confidence intervals (CIs). Inferential comparisons between groups (changes in biochemical values) were carried out using the Student t or the Mann-Whitney U test, according to data distribution determined by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. The chi squared or Mann-Whitney U test were utilized to associate clinical and biochemical parameters, and malnutrition. Statistical significance was determined as p < 0.05 with a two-sided test. SPSS software package version 15 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was employed to analyze the data.
Clinical characteristics of the patients
n = 100
Age years (mean ± sd)
58.9 ± 10.6
Mean ± sd
24.9 ± 3.7
Mean ± sd
3.1 ± 0.5
Diabetes at diagnosis
The main observed any grade non-hematologic toxicities were alopecia (84%), nausea (49%) neuropathy (46%), weight loss (44%) and vomiting (40%). The most commonly observed any grade hematologic toxicities were anemia, lymphopenia, and leukopenia in 33, 31, and 30% of patients, respectively. No significant differences were found when relating toxicity and age. Male patients developed anemia (38 vs. 61.5; p = 0.001) and neuropathy (44 vs. 55; p = 0.03) more frequently than female patients did. Patients with poor functional status (ECOG 2) presented anemia (32.6 vs. 21.6; p = 0.001) more frequently than those with a good functional status (ECOG 0 and 1).
Clinical and nutritional factors related to chemotherapy-induced toxicity development
Toxicity Grade III/IV
(Female vs male)
(38 vs 61.5)
(44 vs 55)
(55 vs 46)
(0,1 vs 2)
(32.6 vs 21.6)
(45 vs 63)
(51 vs 47)
(>3.1 vs ≤3.0)
(47 vs 56)
(36 vs 64)
(46.7 vs 57.1)
(48 vs 54)
(46 vs 58)
(43 vs 62)
(>10% vs <9.9))
(23 vs 30)
(23.4 vs 30.9)
(≤19.9 vs >20)
(48 vs 76)
(49 vs 68)
(well nourished vs malnourished)
( 31 vs 22)
(≥5 vs ≤5)
(≥150 vs ≤150)
(37.9 vs 53.8)
(59.3 vs 47)
Global toxicity in relation to albumin serum levels before chemotherapy was given.
38.5 vs 53.3
41 vs 54
43.8 vs 62.2
Nutritional and functional deterioration are so frequently encountered in cancer patients that they are often accepted as part of the disease and its treatment . The majority of patients with advanced NSCLC also present with malnourishment [31–34] and subsequently, with hypoalbuminemia. In our study, we found that one half of our patients were malnourished and presented hypoalbuminemia prior to chemotherapy. One of the most frequently employed first-line treatments for NSCLC is P plus TXN , both have been strongly associated with toxic side effects . However, the potential benefits of this therapy in general outweigh the possible risks. The most common side effects of TXN used alone or in combination with other chemotherapy medications and demonstrated in some trials include anemia, leukopenia, neutropenia, alopecia, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea [14–16].
The binding of TXN to plasma proteins such as albumin is important for achieving its therapeutic target. Albumin binds TXN and transports it in the bloodstream, allowing its gradual liberation, thus decreasing its toxic effects . Therefore, we thought it would be useful not only for determining nutritional status, but also for predicting toxicity in patients with NSCLC under chemotherapy, given that albumin levels are not influenced solely by the oncologic process, but also by the patients protein and caloric intake prior to and during treatment. We found that patients who were well-nourished and with normal albumin levels benefited in terms of developing less toxicity after two cycles of TXN-P chemotherapy, on comparison with patients who were malnourished and had serum albumin levels below 3.0 mg/dL, mainly in the development of anemia, neuropathy, and nausea. In addition, with more severe hypoalbuminemia, major toxicities were found (Table 3). Serum albumin concentration has been traditionally used as a biochemical marker of nutritional status; it is one of the easiest parameters to measure and that which best reflects the state of visceral protein . Although albumin is the main protein synthesized in liver , its long half-life and broad distribution in the body prevent nutritional changes from being reflected rapidly in albumin serum concentration . Several processes control plasma albumin concentration, including absolute rate of albumin synthesis and fractional catabolic rate (FCR), among others. It has been previously demonstrated that patients with advanced cancer have an important energy expenditure caused by increased tumor metabolism  and specifically in patients with NSCLC, also by means of chronic airway limitation  Therefore, serum albumin levels can be modified by tumor activity via increased FCR, but also by decreasing albumin synthesis, given that the majority of the time, patients with NSCLC display decreased appetite  and diminish their food intake .
Currently, some studies have associated SIR with a poor prognosis in different solid tumors, particularly in lung cancer [40, 45] The development of SIR in oncologic patients is unclear, which might be related to a tumor hypoxia-necrosis and local tissue damage causing disturbances in the neuro-endocrine metabolism, interleukine synthesis and acute phase protein production . Clinical evidence has also shown that the activation of the SIR is one of the earliest and most important contributory factors of cachexia, moreover these findings help explain the failure of simple nutritional programs to reverse weight loss adequately in patients with cancer . In our study, we used two frequently used parameters of measuring SIR, NLR and PLR [18, 27–30].
Besides, albumin synthesis may diminish with SIR found in patients with advanced NSCLC . We found a relationship between ≥5 NLR and baseline hypoalbuminemia and also of PLR ≥150 with baseline hypoalbuminemia and low BMI. Moreover, patients who had an initial PLR ≥150 develop higher toxicity grade III/IV and anemia. In previous studies, PLR and NLR confer an independent prognostic value in oncologic patients; an increase in absolute neutrophil and platelet count might be implicated in the development of methastases  and low lymphocyte levels could be related to a decreased cell-mediated immunity against tumor tissue . However, these values have not been used as markers of chemotherapy toxicity. Thus the NLR and PLR might be potential biomarkers to predict whether a patient will develop toxicity in this regard because it is almost universally available and adds no additional cost to routine laboratory measurements. Clearly further validation work and a feasibility study are required before it can be considered for clinical use.
Although malnutrition has been associated with increased hospitalization, increased susceptibility to infection, reduced QOL, and increased mortality [49–51], nutritional status evaluation may not be afforded sufficient attention in the field of chemotherapy-induced toxicity in patients with NSCLC, who themselves represent a considerable risk factor for complications and co-morbidities. Albumin is habitually included among parameters utilized for nutritional assessment and has recently become more widespread . It has also been established that serum albumin concentration was an independent prognostic variable for survival in 90 patients with NSCLC . Notwithstanding this, to date few data are available in the literature concerning the prevalence and clinical significance of hypoalbuminemia in oncologic patients and the manner in which it affects their treatment.
Albumin levels, PLR and NLR were all related to the development of chemotherapy-induced toxicity. We therefore consider that the SIR, hypoalbuminemia and malnutrition in unison contribute to its further development.
SIR parameters were associated with malnutrition, weight loss and hypoalbuminemia. Malnutrition and hypoalbuminemia are associated with the development of chemotherapy-induced toxicity in patients with NSCLC treated with P and TXN. Therefore, early nutritional assessment and detection of SIR markers might allow identification of patients at higher risk of developing chemotherapy toxicity and the implementation of an adequate nutritional support might be accompanied by beneficial effects when treating patients with NSCLC; in turn, this may permit completion of maximum oncologic therapy and improve treatment results with a more favorable toxicity profile.
Non-small-cell lung cancer
Subjective Global Assessment
Quality of life
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group
body mass index
- NCI CTCAE:
National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria of Adverse Events
Systemic inflammatory response
Neutrophil Lymphocyte Ratio
Platelet Lymphocyte Ratio
Poster presentation of preliminary results at ASCO 2008 Annual Meeting.
- Danaei G, Hoorn Vander S, Lopez AD, Murray CJ, Ezzati M: Causes of cancer in the world: comparative risk assessment of nine behavioural and environmental risk factors. Lancet. 2005, 366 (9499): 1784-93. 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67725-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, Murray T, Thun MJ: Cancer statistics, 2008. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. 2008, 58 (2): 71-96. 10.3322/CA.2007.0010.Google Scholar
- Lazcano Ponce EC, Tovar Guzman V, Meneses Gonzalez F, Rascon Pacheco RA, Hernandez Avila M: Trends of lung cancer mortality in Mexico. Archives of medical research. 1997, 28 (4): 565-70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ginsberg RJ, Vokes EE, Raben A: Cancer of the lung, section 2: non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer: Principles & Practice. Edited by: De Vita VT, Hellman S, Rosenberg SA. 1997, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 858-8Google Scholar
- Cullen MH, Billingham LJ, Woodroffe CM, Chetiyawardana AD, Gower NH, Joshi R, Ferry DR, Rudd RM, Spiro SG, Cook JE, Trask C, Bessell E, Connolly CK, Tobias J, Souhami RL: Mitomycin, ifosfamide, and cisplatin in unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer: effects on survival and quality of life. J Clin Oncol. 1999, 17 (10): 3188-94.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Harper P: Current clinical practices for ovarian cancers. Seminars in oncology. 2002, 29 (3 Suppl 8): 3-6. 10.1053/sonc.2002.33525.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Seidman AD: Monotherapy options in the management of metastatic breast cancer. Seminars in oncology. 2003, 30 (2 Suppl 3): 6-10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rinaldi M, Cauchi C, Gridelli C: First line chemotherapy in advanced or metastatic NSCLC. Ann Oncol. 2006, 17 (Suppl 5): v64-7. 10.1093/annonc/mdj953.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vokes EE, Herndon JE, Crawford J, Leopold KA, Perry MC, Miller AA, Green MR: Randomized phase II study of cisplatin with gemcitabine or paclitaxel or vinorelbine as induction chemotherapy followed by concomitant chemoradiotherapy for stage IIIB non-small-cell lung cancer: cancer and leukemia group B study 9431. J Clin Oncol. 2002, 20 (20): 4191-8. 10.1200/JCO.2002.03.054.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rowinsky EK, Donehower RC: Paclitaxel (taxol). The New England journal of medicine. 1995, 332 (15): 1004-14. 10.1056/NEJM199504133321507.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Eisenhauer EA, Vermorken JB: The taxoids. Comparative clinical pharmacology and therapeutic potential. Drugs. 1998, 55 (1): 5-30. 10.2165/00003495-199855010-00002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Venook AP, Egorin MJ, Rosner GL, Brown TD, Jahan TM, Batist G, Hohl R, Budman D, Ratain MJ, Kearns CM, Schilsky RL: Phase I and pharmacokinetic trial of paclitaxel in patients with hepatic dysfunction: Cancer and Leukemia Group B 9264. J Clin Oncol. 1998, 16 (5): 1811-9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Watanabe H, Yamamoto N, Tamura T, Shimoyama T, Hotta K, Inoue A, Sawada M, Akiyama Y, Kusaba H, Nokihara H, Sekine I, Kunitoh H, Ohe Y, Kodama T, Saijo N: Study of paclitaxel and dose escalation of cisplatin in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Japanese journal of clinical oncology. 2003, 33 (12): 626-30. 10.1093/jjco/hyg116.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Timmer-Bonte JN, Punt CJ, vd Heijden HF, van Die CE, Bussink J, Beijnen JH, Huitema AD, Tjan-Heijnen VC: Prophylactic G-CSF and antibiotics enable a significant dose-escalation of triplet-chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer. Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands). 2008, 60 (2): 222-30.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chaudhry V, Rowinsky EK, Sartorius SE, Donehower RC, Cornblath DR: Peripheral neuropathy from taxol and cisplatin combination chemotherapy: clinical and electrophysiological studies. Annals of neurology. 1994, 35 (3): 304-11. 10.1002/ana.410350310.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rowinsky EK, Chaudhry V, Forastiere AA, Sartorius SE, Ettinger DS, Grochow LB, Lubejko BG, Cornblath DR, Donehower RC: Phase I and pharmacologic study of paclitaxel and cisplatin with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor: neuromuscular toxicity is dose-limiting. J Clin Oncol. 1993, 11 (10): 2010-20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gordon JN, Green SR, Goggin PM: Cancer cachexia. Qjm. 2005, 98 (11): 779-88. 10.1093/qjmed/hci127.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- McMillan DC: Systemic inflammation, nutritional status and survival in patients with cancer. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2009, 12 (3): 223-6. 10.1097/MCO.0b013e32832a7902.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vassallo JABE: Actualización Ponderada de los Factores de Riesgo del Cáncer. 2003, Montevideo: Comisión Honoraria de Lucha contra el CáncerGoogle Scholar
- Muscaritoli M, Bossola M, Aversa Z, Bellantone R, Rossi Fanelli F: Prevention and treatment of cancer cachexia: new insights into an old problem. Eur J Cancer. 2006, 42 (1): 31-41. 10.1016/j.ejca.2005.07.026.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ottery FD: Cancer cachexia: prevention, early diagnosis, and management. Cancer practice. 1994, 2 (2): 123-31.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lochs H, Dervenis C: Malnutrition--the ignored risk factor. Digestive diseases (Basel, Switzerland). 2003, 21 (3): 196-7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bauer J, Capra S, Ferguson M: Use of the scored Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) as a nutrition assessment tool in patients with cancer. European journal of clinical nutrition. 2002, 56 (8): 779-85. 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601412.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Detsky AS, Baker JP, Mendelson RA, Wolman SL, Wesson DE, Jeejeebhoy KN: Evaluating the accuracy of nutritional assessment techniques applied to hospitalized patients: methodology and comparisons. Jpen. 1984, 8 (2): 153-9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kuzuya M, Kanda S, Koike T, Suzuki Y, Satake S, Iguchi A: Evaluation of Mini-Nutritional Assessment for Japanese frail elderly. Nutrition (Burbank, Los Angeles County, Calif). 2005, 21 (4): 498-503.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Laky B, Janda M, Bauer J, Vavra C, Cleghorn G, Obermair A: Malnutrition among gynaecological cancer patients. European journal of clinical nutrition. 2007, 61 (5): 642-6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yamanaka T, Matsumoto S, Teramukai S, Ishiwata R, Nagai Y, Fukushima M: The baseline ratio of neutrophils to lymphocytes is associated with patient prognosis in advanced gastric cancer. Oncology. 2007, 73 (3-4): 215-20. 10.1159/000127412. Epub 2008 Apr 17View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sarraf KM, Belcher E, Raevsky E, Nicholson AG, Goldstraw P, Lim E: Neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio and its association with survival after complete resection in non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009, 137 (2): 425-8. 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2008.05.046. Epub 2008 Aug 29View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Walsh SR, Cook EJ, Goulder F, Justin TA, Keeling NJ: Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic factor in colorectal cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2005, 91 (3): 181-4. 10.1002/jso.20329.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Smith RA, Bosonnet L, Raraty M, Sutton R, Neoptolemos JP, Campbell F, Ghaneh P: Preoperative platelet-lymphocyte ratio is an independent significant prognostic marker in resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg. 2009, 197 (4): 466-72. 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.12.057. Epub 2008 Jul 17View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sarhill N, Mahmoud F, Walsh D, Nelson KA, Komurcu S, Davis M, LeGrand S, Abdullah O, Rybicki L: Evaluation of nutritional status in advanced metastatic cancer. Support Care Cancer. 2003, 11 (10): 652-9. 10.1007/s00520-003-0486-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Busch E, Verazin G, Antkowiak JG, Driscoll D, Takita H: Pulmonary complications in patients undergoing thoracotomy for lung carcinoma. Chest. 1994, 105 (3): 760-6. 10.1378/chest.105.3.760.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bashir Y, Graham TR, Torrance A, Gibson GJ, Corris PA: Nutritional state of patients with lung cancer undergoing thoracotomy. Thorax. 1990, 45 (3): 183-6. 10.1136/thx.45.3.183.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- McMillan DC: An inflammation-based prognostic score and its role in the nutrition-based management of patients with cancer. Proc Nutr Soc. 2008, 67 (3): 257-62. 10.1017/S0029665108007131. Epub 2008 May 1View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fabi A, Barduagni M, Ferraresi V, Cortesi E, Gamucci T, De Marinis F, Saltarelli R, Gabriele A, Pellicciotta M, Ceribelli A, De Marco S, Facciolo F, Cognetti F: The combination of carboplatin and weekly paclitaxel: a safe and active regimen in advanced non small-cell lung cancer patients. A phase I-II study. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2004, 23 (1): 25-32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Paal K, Shkarupin A: Paclitaxel binding to the fatty acid-induced conformation of human serum albumin--automated docking studies. Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry. 2007, 15 (24): 7568-75. 10.1016/j.bmc.2007.09.006.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kratz F, Ehling G, Kauffmann HM, Unger C: Acute and repeat-dose toxicity studies of the (6-maleimidocaproyl)hydrazone derivative of doxorubicin (DOXO-EMCH), an albumin-binding prodrug of the anticancer agent doxorubicin. Human & experimental toxicology. 2007, 26 (1): 19-35. 10.1177/0960327107073825.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- D'Angio RG: Is there a role for albumin administration in nutrition support?. The Annals of pharmacotherapy. 1994, 28 (4): 478-82.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Guthrie RD, Hines C: Use of intravenous albumin in the critically ill patient. The American journal of gastroenterology. 1991, 86 (3): 255-63.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Forrest LM, McMillan DC, McArdle CS, Angerson WJ, Dunlop DJ: Evaluation of cumulative prognostic scores based on the systemic inflammatory response in patients with inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer. Br J Cancer. 2003, 89 (6): 1028-30. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601242.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Holroyde CP, Reichard GA: General metabolic abnormalities in cancer patients: anorexia and cachexia. The Surgical clinics of North America. 1986, 66 (5): 947-56.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wilson DO, Rogers RM, Hoffman RM: Nutrition and chronic lung disease. The American review of respiratory disease. 1985, 132 (6): 1347-65.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Morss Dy S: Enteral and Parenteral Nutrition in Terminally Ill Cancer Patients: A Review of the Literature. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2006, 23: 369-77. 10.1177/1049909106292167.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Casado-Cobo SCR: Dietary interventions in Cancer. Rev Oncol. 2004, 6: 496-500.Google Scholar
- Forrest LM, McMillan DC, McArdle CS, Angerson WJ, Dunlop DJ: Comparison of aninflammation-based prognostic score (GPS) with performance status (ECOG) in patients receiving platinum-based chemotherapy for inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer. Br J Cancer. 2004, 90 (9): 1704-6.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Gabay C, Kushner I: Acute-phase proteins and other systemic responses to in6lammation. N Engl J Med. 1999, 340: 448-454. 10.1056/NEJM199902113400607.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nakahara Y, Mochiduki Y, Miyamoto Y, Nakahara Y, Katsura Y: Prognostic significance of the lymphocyte-to-neutrophil ratio in percutaneous fine-needle aspiration biopsy specimens of advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma. Cancer. 2005, 104 (6): 1271-80. 10.1002/cncr.21290.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lissoni P, Brivio F, Fumagalli L, Messina G, Ghezzi V, Frontini L, Giani L, Vaghi M, Adizzoia A, Gardani GS: Efficacy of cancer chemotherapy in relation to the pretreatment number of lymphocytes in patients with metastatic solid tumors. Int J Biol Markers. 2004, 19 (2): 135-40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sung JBG, Joshi M, Bochicchio K, Costas A, Tracy K, Scalea TM: Admission serum albumin is predicitve of outcome in critically ill trauma patients. Am Surg. 2004, 70: 1099-102.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kuzuya MIS, Enoki H, Okada K, Iguchi A: Is serum albumin a good marker for malnutrition in the physically impaired elderly?. Clin Nutr. 2007, 26: 84-90. 10.1016/j.clnu.2006.07.009.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Win TRA, Wells F, Laroche C: The incidence and impact of low body mass index on patients with operable lung cancer. Clin Nutr. 2007, 26: 440-43. 10.1016/j.clnu.2007.01.009.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Numeroso F, Barilli AL, Delsignore R: Prevalence and significance of hypoalbuminemia in an internal medicine department. European journal of internal medicine. 2008, 19 (8): 587-91. 10.1016/j.ejim.2007.04.029.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Evans WK, Nixon DW, Daly JM, Ellenberg SS, Gardner L, Wolfe E, Shepherd FA, Feld R, Gralla R, Fine S: A randomized study of oral nutritional support versus ad lib nutritional intake during chemotherapy for advanced colorectal and non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1987, 5 (1): 113-24.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/10/50/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.