Demethylation by 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine in colorectal cancer cells targets genomic DNA whilst promoter CpG island methylation persists
© Mossman et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 12 January 2010
Accepted: 12 July 2010
Published: 12 July 2010
DNA methylation and histone acetylation are epigenetic modifications that act as regulators of gene expression. Aberrant epigenetic gene silencing in tumours is a frequent event, yet the factors which dictate which genes are targeted for inactivation are unknown. DNA methylation and histone acetylation can be modified with the chemical agents 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine (5-aza-dC) and Trichostatin A (TSA) respectively. The aim of this study was to analyse de-methylation and re-methylation and its affect on gene expression in colorectal cancer cell lines treated with 5-aza-dC alone and in combination with TSA. We also sought to identify methylation patterns associated with long term reactivation of previously silenced genes.
Colorectal cancer cell lines were treated with 5-aza-dC, with and without TSA, to analyse global methylation decreases by High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC). Re-methylation was observed with removal of drug treatments. Expression arrays identified silenced genes with differing patterns of expression after treatment, such as short term reactivation or long term reactivation. Sodium bisulfite sequencing was performed on the CpG island associated with these genes and expression was verified with real time PCR.
Treatment with 5-aza-dC was found to affect genomic methylation and to a lesser extent gene specific methylation. Reactivated genes which remained expressed 10 days post 5-aza-dC treatment featured hypomethylated CpG sites adjacent to the transcription start site (TSS). In contrast, genes with uniformly hypermethylated CpG islands were only temporarily reactivated.
These results imply that 5-aza-dC induces strong de-methylation of the genome and initiates reactivation of transcriptionally inactive genes, but this does not require gene associated CpG island de-methylation to occur. In addition, for three of our selected genes, hypomethylation at the TSS of an epigenetically silenced gene is associated with the long term reversion of gene expression level brought about by alterations in the epigenetic status following 5-aza-dC treatment.
DNA methylation is an epigenetic modification that occurs on cytosine residues in the sequence context 5'-CG-3'. It is well established that DNA methylation acts as a transcriptional repressor of gene expression via recruitment of repressive proteins. These include the Methyl-CpG Binding Protein 1 (MeCP1) and proteins with a methyl-binding domain, such as MBD1, MBD2, MBD3, MBD4 and MeCP2. These proteins hinder transcription through the recruitment of other factors such as nucleosome remodelling complex . In the case of MeCP2, the protein is capable of binding to a single symmetrically methylated cytosine and contributing to the long-term repression of transcription . The binding of these additional protein factors leads to condensation of DNA and confers stability to the chromosome.
In normal cells, repetitive elements such as long interspersed nucleotide elements, Alu repeats, transposable elements, and satellite and non-satellite sequences which together make up almost half of the genome, are methylated [3–5]. Methylation of these regions largely contributes to the level of global methylation, and it is likely that these regions are most drastically affected by aberrant hypomethylation and the stability that the methylation once conferred to the chromosomes is lost. Aberrant methylation is one of the more frequent molecular changes observed in tumour cells  and typically involves the reversal of normal methylation patterns. It has been known for some time that common changes involve genome wide hypomethylation, which impinges on the expression of oncogenes , loss of imprinting and hypermethylation of tumour suppressor genes . These are believed to be a cause rather than a consequence of the malignant process as they arise early in disease development . Supporting this is strong evidence that global hypomethylation plays a crucial role in causing genomic instability in colorectal carcinogenesis . Alternatively, gene specific hypermethylation is another mechanism which can initiate carcinogenesis. This mechanism of gene silencing has been shown by the correlation of methylated promoters with a subsequent decrease in corresponding gene expression. The precise set of events that govern which CpG residues are methylated are not understood, nor is the mechanism that causes hypomethylation .
5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine (5-aza-dC) is a strong inducer of DNA de-methylation. It is an analogue of cytosine, that when incorporated into DNA, irreversibly binds the methyltransferase enzymes as they attempt to methylate the cytosine analogue. This depletion of methyltransferase in the cell results in passive de-methylation, which is known to reactivate epigenetically silenced genes . 5-aza-dC has demonstrated its most positive effect in the treatment of hematologic malignancy such as myelodysplastic syndromes . In this scenario, its effectiveness may be due to sensitisation to other reagents or the re-activation of silenced genes which have an apoptotic effect. Another agent which affects the epigenetic status of genes is Trichostatin A (TSA). TSA was originally developed as an antifungal agent , but was also found to lead to the accumulation of acetylated histones via the inhibition of Histone Deacetylase . The presence of an acetyl group on a lysine amino acid in the N-terminal end of core histone proteins neutralises the positive charge carried by the lysine, weakening the association between the nucleosome and DNA  to favour transcriptional activity. Reports have demonstrated a synergistic effect of TSA with 5-aza-dC in the re-expression of epigenetically silenced genes [17–20]. Currently it is not known how methylation patterns are altered with 5-aza-dC, and how or if these patterns can be restored when drug treatment ceases.
The aim of this study was to examine patterns of DNA methylation in several colorectal cancer (CRC) cell lines, to assess how these patterns are affected by drugs which alter epigenetic status, and profile the re-methylation process at both a genome-wide and gene specific level. Currently, the process of re-methylation following 5-aza-dC is not well documented.
Colorectal cancer cells HCT116, SW48, SW480, HT29 and a fibroblast cell line derived from a healthy donor were all cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% Foetal Calf Serum (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO) at 37°C and 5% CO2. De-methylation was induced with 5-aza-dC (Sigma-Aldrich) treatment at a pre-determined concentration that induced maximal de-methylation of the DNA without killing the cells. Culture media for LoVo and the fibroblast cells contained 10 μM 5-aza-dC, whilst all other cells were treated with 15 μM. Cells were incubated for 72 h with 5-aza-dC with the culture media being replaced every 24 h with fresh media containing 5-aza-dC. DNA and RNA were extracted before drug treatment and after 72 h of drug treatment. Immediately following drug treatment (72 h), a fraction of the cells were washed twice with PBS and allowed to continue growing under regular drug-free conditions. At every two days following cessation of treatment, DNA and RNA were extracted while a fraction of the cells continued to be incubated until ten days of drug free growth. The experiment was also performed on HCT116 cells continuously exposed to 150 ηM Trichostatin A (Sigma-Aldrich) during the treatment and re-methylation period to assess the affect of histone acetylation on DNA re-methylation. This concentration chosen has previously been shown to cause hyper-acetylation in the HCT116 cell line .
Cytotoxicity and Apoptosis testing
The assessment of cytotoxicity and apoptosis was undertaken using pooled cell cultures as per the assay protocol provided with the detection kits. For practicality, the HCT116, SW480 and LoVo cell lines were assayed. Cytotoxicty was quantified using Cytotoxicty Detection Kit (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) according to manufacturer's instructions. Apoptosis was determined using an Annexin V Apoptosis Detection Kit from BD Biosciences and analysed on a BD FACSCantoII flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ) following the manufacturer's instructions.
High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) Analysis of Global Methylation Levels
50 μg of DNA was treated with 5 μL RNAse Cocktail (Ambion, Austin, TX) to remove any residual RNA which would interfere with HPLC analysis. DNA was then phenol-chloroform extracted and resuspended in sterile water. DNA aliquots of 3 μg were digested with 1.5 U of Nuclease P1 (US Biological, Swampscott, MA) and incubated at 37°C for 16 h. Following digestion, 2 μL of Calf Intestinal Alkaline Phosphatase (Promega, Madison, WI) was added and incubated at 37°C for a further two hours. Separation of nucleosides was performed on a Varian Star Chromatography workstation with a Supelcosil LC-18-DB column (Sigma-Aldrich) over 30 min at 35°C with absorbance monitored at 278 nm. Peak areas were quantified with Star Reviewer Software (Varian, Palo Alto, CA) and the 5-methylcytosine content was expressed as a percentage of the total cytosine pool after correction for extinction co-efficients. Standard deviations were calculated and a T-test was employed to compare expression levels in drug treated cells against untreated cells. P-values less than 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.
Illumina arrays and Analysis
Illumina Human Ref-8 expression arrays (Illumina, Hayward, CA) were used to measure genome wide gene expression at four chosen time points; untreated cells, treated cells (day 0 of re-methylation), and at four (d4) and ten days (d10) of drug free growth and re-methylation. These time points were selected based on global methylation levels at these time points. Untreated and treated cells were used to identify changes caused by 5-aza-dC, whilst day 4 would allow an intermediate and day 10 a final assessment of the changes in gene expression during re-methylation. Data analysis was performed in Genespring 7.3.1. software (Agilent, Foster City, CA). Genes were classified according to their expression pattern, and were selected with the aim of comparing methylation patterns in genes temporarily reactivated and those still expressed after 10 days of drug free growth. The genes selected for analysis were CDO1, HSPC105, MAGEA3, RNF113B., ZFP3 and two colorectal cancer related genes CDKN2A and MLH1. These genes displayed different expression patterns in the HT29, SW480, SW48 and HCT116 cell lines that could be further examined.
Bisulfite conversion, PCR and direct sequencing
DNA was converted in duplicate using a Qiagen Epitect Bisulfite conversion kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) using 2 μg of phenol-chloroform purified DNA. Samples were eluted in 30 μL of elution buffer and an aliquot was diluted 1:3 prior to PCR and stored at 4°C, whilst the remaining fraction was stored at -20°C. CpG islands surrounding the transcription start site of genes were targeted in PCR analysis using the primers listed in Additional File 1: Table S1. Primers included a non-CpG cytosine at the 3' end in order to preferentially amplify converted DNA sequences. Amplified products were purified with Ampure magnetic bead clean-up system (Agencourt, Beverly, MA). Big Dye Terminator Version 3.1 sequencing mastermix was used with the forward PCR primer and reactions were purified with CleanSEQ magnetic clean-up system (Agencourt). Sequencing was performed in duplicate on an ABI 3730 sequencer and data analysis was carried out using Sequence Scanner software (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). The percentage methylation at each CpG was determined by dividing the cytosine peak by the combined heights of the cytosine and thymine peaks as described previously .
mRNA expression analysis
Extracted RNA was converted to cDNA using Superscript II (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Real time PCR was performed using an ABI 7500 real time PCR machine and SYBR green mastermix (Applied Biosystems) and primers listed in Additional File 1: Table T1. Reactions were carried out in triplicate and the fold change in expression was normalised to the β-actin housekeeping gene using the 2-ΔΔCt method. For the purpose of calculating fold changes in expression, genes with no detectable expression were assigned a Ct value of 40. Standard deviations were calculated and a T-test was employed to compare expression levels in drug treated cells against untreated cells. P-values less than 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.
This study was deemed exempt from ethics approval from the University of Newcastle, and consent was not required due to use of cell lines.
Global Methylation levels
Global methylation response to 5-aza-dC and re-methylation
Cell Death induced by 5-aza-dC and during recovery period.
4 d post treatment
10 d post treatment
4 d post treatment
10 d post treatment
4 d post treatment
10 d post treatment
Global methylation response to combined 5-aza-dC and TSA and re-methylation
Genomic methylation of cells treated with 5-aza-dC alone and in combination with TSA.
Time after 5-aza-dC
5-aza-dC & TSA
Commonly reactivated genes in 5-aza-dC treated colorectal cancer cells
Gametocyte specific factor 1-like
Synovial sarcoma, × breakpoint 6 (Pseudogene)
CCCTC-binding factor (zinc finger protein)-like
Spermatogenesis associated 22
Tubulin alpha 3C
Expression patterns of reactivated genes.
HCT116 + TSA
Gene methylation and expression in response to 5-aza-dC
Bisulfite sequencing of seven individual gene promoter regions revealed that de-methylation and re-methylation changes observed at the genome-wide level were not reflected in CpG Island (CGI) methylation levels of the seven genes examined. Global levels decreased by over 50% in some cell lines, however the reduction of methylation at specific gene CGIs was significantly less. The highest de-methylation observed at a specific gene was ~25% at the RNF113B CGI in the HT29 (See Additional File 3: Figure S3), SW480 and HCT116 cell lines.
Partial methylation was detected in the CGI of MAGEA3 and HSPC105 genes that were actively transcribed in untreated cells however no methylation was detected in the CGI associated with the beta-actin housekeeping gene in any of the cell lines tested. The MAGEA3 and HSPC105 genes in HCT116 and HT29 cells respectively, were both expressed and with CGI methylation of ~50-60% suggesting only one allele was hypermethylated.
HCT116 and SW48 cells are of particular interest since the hypermethylation of the promoter regions of CDKN2A (NM_000077.3) and MLH1 respectively are considered to result in the repression of these genes' expression. In the HCT116 cells, the CDKN2A CGI displayed a region of 50% methylation in the vicinity of the TSS that spanned at least 100 bp (Additional File 6: Figure S6). Consequently, CDKN2A expression was detected at all times points in these cells. With the exception of SW48, MLH1 was expressed in all cells, and no methylation was detected in MLH1 CGI. After 10 days of drug free growth, MLH1 was still expressed in SW48 cells, but this did not correlate with the methylation status of the MLH1 CpG island, which was hypermethylated.
While some genes were still highly expressed 10 days after 5-aza-dC treatment, there were a group of genes which were temporarily up-regulated or re-expressed but were expressed at low levels after 10 days of drug free growth. Genes in this category that were studied include the ZFP3 (NM_153018.1) (Figure 3) and RNF113B (NM_178861.3) genes in the HT29 cell line. De-methylation was observed at the RNF113B CGI after 5-aza-dC exposure and this level returned to normal levels 10 days after removal of the 5-aza-dC. Genes classified as temporarily reactivated by 5-aza-dC had uniform levels of hypermethylation, unlike those classified as 'permanently' reactivated which carried hypomethylated CpG sites.
Discussion and Conclusions
The involvement of epigenetic factors, particularly DNA methylation on the regulation of gene expression has been recognised for quite some time, however it is a process not totally understood. The events which underlie genomic hypomethylation and hypermethylation of tumour suppressor genes in malignant cells and why these types of genes are targeted remain unresolved. HPLC analysis of genomic DNA was performed to assess the level of total methylation content present in several types of CRC cells. Genome wide hypomethylation was observed in all the CRC cell lines analysed when compared with the fibroblast cell line, and the lower levels of global methylation in the LoVo and HT29 cell lines may contribute to the genomic instability observed in these cell lines. This finding is consistent with previous reports that malignant cells have lower levels of genomic DNA methylation when compared with healthy tissues [23, 24]. The de-methylation observed on a global level did not correlate with that found at specific CGIs, and consequently, expression was observed from genes associated with a hypermethylated promoter. The discrepancy between global and specific gene methylation levels can be explained by the reduced methylation level of Alu elements and LINE methylation. Yang and colleagues  demonstrated Alu elements and LINE methylation is reduced by 16% and 60% respectively in colorectal cancer cell lines treated for 72 h with 5-aza-dC. Repetitive regions are likely to fall within compacted heterochromatin where methyltransferase access to the DNA is limited and as a result these sequences become more readily hypomethylated. Furthermore, methylation reductions in a combination of transposable elements , satellite repeats  and other methylated GC rich areas of the genome which do not form bona fide CpG islands  may also contribute to this difference.
Global methylation levels and response to 5-aza-dC and TSA
In all cell lines studied significant genome-wide de-methylation was observed, and a greater than 50% reduction was observed in SW48, SW480 and HCT116 cells, indicating significant DNA de-methylation. Amongst the cancer cells, higher pre-treatment levels of global methylation appeared to correlate with a larger decrease in global methylation levels. Even with exposure to a high concentration of 5-aza-dC, global methylation levels following treatment averaged ~1.2% in the colorectal cancer cell lines. This may be interpreted to suggest that if total methylation levels fall below this point, cell death may be induced either through de-methylation, or toxicity from excessive DNMT binding to DNA. Further analysis of DNA with genome wide methylation arrays might reveal regions that are common to all cell lines which are resistant to DNA de-methylation induced by 5-aza-dC. This possibility was not examined in the current study.
By the tenth day of drug free growth, the global methylation of all cell lines had increased and was nearing pre-treatment levels. The rate of re-methylation was steady in the SW480, LoVo, HT29 and fibroblast cell lines, whilst periods of rapid re-methylation were observed in HCT116 and SW48 cell lines (Figure 1). Despite genomic methylation increasing, the rate was reduced dramatically after this point which may suggest levels have, or could, plateau below the original level. This scenario could be indicative of an altered pattern of gene expression following 5-aza-dC treatment. The HCT116 and SW48 cell lines are known to harbour epigenetic changes, and were among the most affected by 5-aza-dC which may suggest regulation of DNA methylation in these cell lines is different from the others studied.
Continual exposure of the HCT116 cells to Trichostatin A was performed in combination with regular 5-aza-dC treatment to investigate whether altering histone acetylation and chromatin conformation could affect the DNA methylation process and subsequent gene expression patterns. TSA is an inhibitor of Histone Deacetylase and leads to histone hyper-acetylation. Histone acetylation is associated with regions of active chromatin  and has been shown to assist the binding of a the TFIIIA transcription factor to chromatin templates . With this knowledge, an investigation into whether global de-methylation could be enhanced and if re-methylation could be restricted by histone hyper-acetylation was undertaken. Our results show that at a genome wide level, TSA did not enhance the de-methylation process in HCT116 cells, and continual exposure to TSA for ten days did not significantly alter the re-methylation process (Table 2) in the HCT116 cell line. The p-value of 0.06 indicates the largest difference is at the d0 time point, however at this time the TSA treated cell line had a greater level of global methylation, and therefore did not enhance de-methylation. Based on these observations, DNA methylation is not hindered by histone acetylation. This notion does not conflict with previous findings that 5-aza-dC and TSA have a synergistic effect on gene expression [17, 30] rather it indicates methyltransferase enzymes are not deterred from hyper-acetylated DNA.
Expression arrays were conducted with the aim of identifying reactivated genes that were differentially expressed between the cell lines and could be subjected to bisulfite sequencing analysis. In addition, the influence of TSA on expression patterns could be observed. Combined treatment of TSA with 5-aza-dC did not cause an increase in the number of reactivated genes which is in accordance with its minor influence on genomic methylation levels. Again, this does not conflict with previous reports of a synergistic effect of the two drugs, but indicates DNA methylation plays a greater role than histone acetylation in reactivating silenced genes on a genome wide level . The synergistic effect of TSA was observed with prolonged expression of 165 genes deemed temporarily reactivated with 5-aza-dC alone, implicating TSA treatment as a valuable tool for maintaining expression of genes reactivated with 5-aza-dC.
The combined use of 5-aza-dC and TSA may be advantageous in overcoming poor outcomes in tumour types that do not respond to 5-aza-dC alone. A 'maintenance' administration of TSA following a 5-aza-dC treatment cycle may assist with prolonged gene expression without the cytotoxic effects of 5-aza-dC. Furthermore, identification of the pre-existing methylation patterns at genes targeted for reactivation could determine whether that gene will respond to treatment and whether a particular patient is suitable for this type of therapy.
Bisulphite sequencing of CpG islands
Bisulphite conversion of DNA followed by PCR and direct sequencing across a CGI permits quantification of the methylation at individual CpG sites and allows for the establishment of a methylation profile of CpG islands. The genes studied displayed varying levels of responsiveness to 5-aza-dC treatment, as observed by a decreased CGI methylation, however the decrease was not consistent with that observed on a genome wide level. The largest decrease in gene specific methylation was in the RNF113B gene. After treatment, CGI methylation levels dropped by over 20% in the HT29 cell line with an associated increase in gene expression. By the tenth day of drug-free growth the CGI methylation returned to pre-treatment levels, which correlated with the return of normal levels of gene expression.
Sequencing of CGIs allowed the detection of several instances where a small cluster of cytosines were hypomethylated amongst an otherwise hypermethylated CpG island in a non-expressed gene. These hypomethylated cytosines appear at a CpG site adjacent to the TSS of a gene, as seen in the MAGEA3 CGI in SW480 cells. Upon culturing the cells for a further four and ten days in drug free media, these cells were found to still be expressing the previously silenced MAGEA3 gene, suggesting the transcriptional status of this gene had been permanently reversed. In comparison, the HCT116 cell line expressed these two genes constitutively. The only common methylation pattern amongst the two cell lines was <50% methylation at the CpG sites 1 bp upstream and 10 bp downstream of the TSS in the MAGEA3 gene. This kind of reactivation was also observed in CDO1, and HSPC105 genes in SW480 cells which also carried hypomethylated CpG sites.
To investigate the possibility that the enduring reactivation of genes was due to continued cytotoxicity or apoptosis, we monitored these levels over the corresponding time period. Both cytotoxicity and apoptosis levels were elevated by 5-aza-dC, but decreased when the drug was removed. This indicates gene expression variation is a result of changes in genomic methylation rather than activation of apoptotic pathways. The fraction of necrotic cells remained higher than in untreated cells which are likely to represent reactivated genes that orchestrate cell death or cells that died in the time prior to the measurement of apoptosis.
Treatment of cells with 5-aza-dC caused the reactivation of numerous genes, although de-methylation within the CGI of specific genes did not correlate with genomic levels (as discussed earlier) or transcription levels. Consequently we observed that 5-aza-dC induced expression can be driven from a largely methylated promoter with localised demethylation at the TSS. One such example is the CDO1 gene in SW480 cells (Additional File 7: Figure S7), where ~10% de-methylation (ie 10% of all alleles) at three CpG sites caused a greater than 1000-fold up-regulation of CDO1 mRNA.
We envisage the significant increase in expression of CDO1 is inflated due to non-existent expression in untreated cells, and that modest expression is permitted due to hypomethylation in a small proportion of cells at the TSS. As methylation of surrounding CpG sites was largely unaltered, demethylation of three CpG sites in a 50 bp region surrounding the TSS is permissive of transcription, and does not require hypomethylation of the entire allele. A similar finding has been previously reported in CDKN2A in cervical carcinogenesis  and also in the CDH1 gene in . The minor demethylation of CDH1 in conjunction with large increase of gene expression may suggest that DNA methylation does not repress transcription, and gene up-regulation could be due to either a secondary effect or the involvement of other factors which are also modified by 5-aza-dC treatment.
Clusters of CpG sites were identified in some genes that showed a region of hypomethylation, such as MAGEA3 in HT29 cells (Additional File 4: Figure S4) and ZFP3 in the SW480 cells (Additional File 8: Figure S8). Expression of these genes was detected before 5-aza-dC treatment, demonstrating the importance of methylation in the CpG sites around the TSS, and how a region of hypomethylation is permissive of transcription. Methylation of ~50% was detected at some CGIs including CDKN2A in HCT116 cells. These genes are likely to show mono-allelic methylation which has been reported previously [33, 34], where all expression is from one non-methylated allele.
The MLH1 gene is silenced by methylation on both alleles in SW48 cells . Following 5-aza-dC treatment, de-methylation was induced and the gene was re-expressed and by the tenth day of drug free growth, the gene was still expressed despite methylation returning to pre-treatment levels. The expression level of MLH1 at day 10 may be due to lower methylation at a CpG site 32 bp downstream from the TSS, which is similar to the long term reactivation in the CDO1, MAGEA3 and HSPC105 genes in SW480 cells. The analysis undertaken suggests that genes thought to be under control of epigenetic modifications such as CDKN2A and MLH1 were not shown to have significantly altered patterns of CpG methylation following 5-aza-dC treatment, although an increase in expression was observed.
In non-expressed genes, the identification of regions of hypomethylated cytosine in a generally hypermethylated CpG island raises the question of how these cytosines are maintained in a hypomethylated state. As the region of hypomethylated cytosines in these genes is less than 146 bp - the length of DNA associated with a nucleosome, it would suggest in this scenario at least, an absent nucleosome is not a factor in assisting transcription as previously described . It would appear 5-aza-dC can induce an irregular nucleosomal conformation that permits expression from methylated genes. It is also possible that 5-aza-dC reduces repressive histone tail marks or initiates the gain of active marks in the area surrounding the hypomethylated cytosine following 5-aza-dC exposure. The methylation of Histone H3 Lysine 9 is a modification associated with inactive chromatin and has been shown to be rapidly lost with 5-aza-dC treatment . It is possible that a loss of H3K9 methylation may have been induced by 5-aza-dC in the current study, which may allow binding of transcriptional proteins, which in turn enhance transcriptional reactivation.
Hypomethylated CpG sites which exert control on gene expression may have implications for methods such as methylation-specific PCR and array technologies which rely on the methylation status of a small number of CpG sites in order to determine a given genes methylation status. The observation that a single or small group of CpG sites could affect expression may have greater implications should a polymorphism exist at the site. A polymorphism at the CG dinucleotide will deny methyl-group attachment which would be advantageous to individuals with that change by conferring a protective effect against epigenetic inactivation, particularly in genes such as MLH1.
Our results show that 5-aza-dC induces gene expression, but is not necessarily dependant on DNA de-methylation. The pre-existing level of methylation surrounding the transcriptional start site of a gene appears important in long term reactivation. This was demonstrated as the transcriptional status of silenced genes could be reversed with 5-aza-dC and for up to ten days after its removal in genes with hypomethylated cytosines despite minimal CpG de-methylation. In CGIs which exhibited a uniform level of hypermethylation, transcription could be induced for a short term only. The acetylation of histones was not found to alter the de-methylation or re-methylation process and was therefore not expected to cause a change in the gene expression profile. Although constitutively expressed genes demonstrate hypomethylation, 5-aza-dC treatment was found to force expression from genes with hypermethylated CGIs, suggesting that 5-aza-dC is capable of influencing other factors involved with gene expression, such as proteins with a methyl-binding domain or histone modifications.
High Performance Liquid Chromatography
Methyl-CpG binding Protein
Phosphate Buffered Saline
Polymerase Chain Reaction
Transcription Start Site.
This study was supported by funds from NBN Telethon, the University of Newcastle and the Hunter Medical Research Institute. The authors would like to thank Dr Amanda Cox for proof-reading the penultimate version of this report and Melinda Tooze and Kristy Parsons for assistance with the flow-cytometry assay.
- Zhang Y, Ng HH, Erdjument-Bromage H, Tempst P, Bird A, Reinberg D: Analysis of the NuRD subunits reveals a histone deacetylase core complex and a connection with DNA methylation. Genes Dev. 1999, 13 (15): 1924-1935. 10.1101/gad.13.15.1924.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Meehan RR, Lewis JD, Bird AP: Characterization of MeCP2, a vertebrate DNA binding protein with affinity for methylated DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992, 20 (19): 5085-5092. 10.1093/nar/20.19.5085.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Lander ES, Linton LM, Birren B, Nusbaum C, Zody MC, Baldwin J, Devon K, Dewar K, Doyle M, FitzHugh W, et al: Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature. 2001, 409 (6822): 860-921. 10.1038/35057062.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wong LH, Choo KH: Evolutionary dynamics of transposable elements at the centromere. Trends Genet. 2004, 20 (12): 611-616. 10.1016/j.tig.2004.09.011.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yoder JA, Walsh CP, Bestor TH: Cytosine methylation and the ecology of intragenomic parasites. Trends Genet. 1997, 13 (8): 335-340. 10.1016/S0168-9525(97)01181-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jubb AM, Bell SM, Quirke P: Methylation and colorectal cancer. J Pathol. 2001, 195 (1): 111-134. 10.1002/path.923.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Feinberg AP, Vogelstein B: Hypomethylation distinguishes genes of some human cancers from their normal counterparts. Nature. 1983, 301 (5895): 89-92. 10.1038/301089a0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Goelz SE, Vogelstein B, Hamilton SR, Feinberg AP: Hypomethylation of DNA from benign and malignant human colon neoplasms. Science. 1985, 228 (4696): 187-190. 10.1126/science.2579435.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kim HC, Roh SA, Ga IH, Kim JS, Yu CS, Kim JC: CpG island methylation as an early event during adenoma progression in carcinogenesis of sporadic colorectal cancer. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005, 20 (12): 1920-1926. 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2005.03943.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Matsuzaki K, Deng G, Tanaka H, Kakar S, Miura S, Kim YS: The relationship between global methylation level, loss of heterozygosity, and microsatellite instability in sporadic colorectal cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2005, 11 (24 Pt 1): 8564-8569. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-0859.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Liu L, Wylie RC, Andrews LG, Tollefsbol TO: Aging, cancer and nutrition: the DNA methylation connection. Mech Ageing Dev. 2003, 124 (10-12): 989-998. 10.1016/j.mad.2003.08.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Michalowsky LA, Jones PA: Differential nuclear protein binding to 5-azacytosine-containing DNA as a potential mechanism for 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine resistance. Mol Cell Biol. 1987, 7 (9): 3076-3083.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Balch C, Yan P, Craft T, Young S, Skalnik DG, Huang TH, Nephew KP: Antimitogenic and chemosensitizing effects of the methylation inhibitor zebularine in ovarian cancer. Mol Cancer Ther. 2005, 4 (10): 1505-1514. 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-05-0216.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tsuji N, Kobayashi M, Nagashima K, Wakisaka Y, Koizumi K: A new antifungal antibiotic, trichostatin. J Antibiot (Tokyo). 1976, 29 (1): 1-6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yoshida M, Kijima M, Akita M, Beppu T: Potent and specific inhibition of mammalian histone deacetylase both in vivo and in vitro by trichostatin A. J Biol Chem. 1990, 265 (28): 17174-17179.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- McGhee JD, Felsenfeld G: Nucleosome structure. Annu Rev Biochem. 1980, 49: 1115-1156. 10.1146/annurev.bi.49.070180.005343.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cameron EE, Bachman KE, Myohanen S, Herman JG, Baylin SB: Synergy of demethylation and histone deacetylase inhibition in the re-expression of genes silenced in cancer. Nat Genet. 1999, 21 (1): 103-107. 10.1038/5047.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wu Y, Alvarez M, Slamon DJ, Koeffler P, Vadgama JV: Caspase 8 and maspin are downregulated in breast cancer cells due to CpG site promoter methylation. BMC Cancer. 10 (32): 32-
- Ooki A, Yamashita K, Kikuchi S, Sakuramoto S, Katada N, Kokubo K, Kobayashi H, Kim MS, Sidransky D, Watanabe M: Potential utility of HOP homeobox gene promoter methylation as a marker of tumor aggressiveness in gastric cancer. Oncogene. 2010, 15-Google Scholar
- Dannenberg LO, Edenberg HJ: Epigenetics of gene expression in human hepatoma cells: expression profiling the response to inhibition of DNA methylation and histone deacetylation. BMC Genomics. 2006, 7: 181-10.1186/1471-2164-7-181.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Flatmark K, Nome RV, Folkvord S, Bratland A, Rasmussen H, Ellefsen MS, Fodstad O, Ree AH: Radiosensitization of colorectal carcinoma cell lines by histone deacetylase inhibition. Radiat Oncol. 2006, 1: 25-10.1186/1748-717X-1-25.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Deng G, Chen A, Hong J, Chae HS, Kim YS: Methylation of CpG in a small region of the hMLH1 promoter invariably correlates with the absence of gene expression. Cancer Res. 1999, 59 (9): 2029-2033.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Feinberg AP, Gehrke CW, Kuo KC, Ehrlich M: Reduced genomic 5-methylcytosine content in human colonic neoplasia. Cancer Res. 1988, 48 (5): 1159-1161.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cui H, Onyango P, Brandenburg S, Wu Y, Hsieh CL, Feinberg AP: Loss of imprinting in colorectal cancer linked to hypomethylation of H19 and IGF2. Cancer Res. 2002, 62 (22): 6442-6446.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yang AS, Estecio MR, Doshi K, Kondo Y, Tajara EH, Issa JP: A simple method for estimating global DNA methylation using bisulfite PCR of repetitive DNA elements. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32 (3): e38-10.1093/nar/gnh032.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Mund C, Hackanson B, Stresemann C, Lubbert M, Lyko F: Characterization of DNA demethylation effects induced by 5-Aza-2'-deoxycytidine in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome. Cancer Res. 2005, 65 (16): 7086-7090. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-0695.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brock GJ, Charlton J, Bird A: Densely methylated sequences that are preferentially localized at telomere-proximal regions of human chromosomes. Gene. 1999, 240 (2): 269-277. 10.1016/S0378-1119(99)00442-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kornberg RD, Lorch Y: Twenty-five years of the nucleosome, fundamental particle of the eukaryote chromosome. Cell. 1999, 98 (3): 285-294. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81958-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lee DY, Hayes JJ, Pruss D, Wolffe AP: A positive role for histone acetylation in transcription factor access to nucleosomal DNA. Cell. 1993, 72 (1): 73-84. 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90051-Q.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Meng CF, Zhu XJ, Peng G, Dai DQ: Re-expression of methylation-induced tumor suppressor gene silencing is associated with the state of histone modification in gastric cancer cell lines. World J Gastroenterol. 2007, 13 (46): 6166-6171. 10.3748/wjg.13.6166.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Nehls K, Vinokurova S, Schmidt D, Kommoss F, Reuschenbach M, Kisseljov F, Einenkel J, von Knebel Doeberitz M, Wentzensen N: p16 methylation does not affect protein expression in cervical carcinogenesis. Eur J Cancer. 2008, 44 (16): 2496-2505. 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.07.014.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tachibana K, Takeda K, Shiraishi M: 5-Aza-2'-deoxycytidine reactivates the CDH1 gene without influencing the methylation of the entire CpG island or histone modification in a human cancer cell line. Proc Japan Acad. 2004, 80 (7): 342-348. 10.2183/pjab.80.342.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Myohanen SK, Baylin SB, Herman JG: Hypermethylation can selectively silence individual p16ink4A alleles in neoplasia. Cancer Res. 1998, 58 (4): 591-593.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mund C, Beier V, Bewerunge P, Dahms M, Lyko F, Hoheisel JD: Array-based analysis of genomic DNA methylation patterns of the tumour suppressor gene p16INK4A promoter in colon carcinoma cell lines. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33 (8): e73-10.1093/nar/gni072.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Robert MF, Morin S, Beaulieu N, Gauthier F, Chute IC, Barsalou A, MacLeod AR: DNMT1 is required to maintain CpG methylation and aberrant gene silencing in human cancer cells. Nat Genet. 2003, 33 (1): 61-65. 10.1038/ng1068.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chavez S, Beato M: Nucleosome-mediated synergism between transcription factors on the mouse mammary tumor virus promoter. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997, 94 (7): 2885-2890. 10.1073/pnas.94.7.2885.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Nguyen CT, Weisenberger DJ, Velicescu M, Gonzales FA, Lin JC, Liang G, Jones PA: Histone H3-lysine 9 methylation is associated with aberrant gene silencing in cancer cells and is rapidly reversed by 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine. Cancer Res. 2002, 62 (22): 6456-6461.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/10/366/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.