Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Epidemiological evaluation of concordance between initial diagnosis and central pathology review in a comprehensive and prospective series of sarcoma patients in the Rhone-Alpes region

  • Antoine Lurkin1, 2Email author,
  • Francoise Ducimetière1, 2,
  • Dominique Ranchère Vince1,
  • Anne-Valérie Decouvelaere1,
  • Dominic Cellier7,
  • François N Gilly4,
  • Dimitri Salameire5,
  • Pierre Biron1, 2, 3,
  • Guy de Laroche3, 4, 5, 6,
  • Jean Yves Blay1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and
  • Isabelle Ray-Coquard1, 2
BMC Cancer201010:150

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-10-150

Received: 24 September 2009

Accepted: 19 April 2010

Published: 19 April 2010

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
24 Sep 2009 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
24 Sep 2009 Author responded Author comments - Antoine Lurkin
Resubmission - Version 3
24 Sep 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
2 Nov 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Marcus Lehnhardt
13 Nov 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Christel Bremer Lajer
22 Dec 2009 Author responded Author comments - Antoine Lurkin
Resubmission - Version 5
22 Dec 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 5
27 Jan 2010 Author responded Author comments - Antoine Lurkin
Resubmission - Version 6
27 Jan 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 6
2 Mar 2010 Author responded Author comments - Antoine Lurkin
Resubmission - Version 7
2 Mar 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 7
26 Mar 2010 Author responded Author comments - Antoine Lurkin
Resubmission - Version 8
26 Mar 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 8
Resubmission - Version 9
Submitted Manuscript version 9
Resubmission - Version 10
Submitted Manuscript version 10
13 Apr 2010 Author responded Author comments - Antoine Lurkin
Resubmission - Version 11
13 Apr 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 11
Publishing
19 Apr 2010 Editorially accepted
19 Apr 2010 Article published 10.1186/1471-2407-10-150

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Centre Léon Bérard
(2)
INSERM EA 4129 « SIS »
(3)
ONCORA network, Réseau Oncologie Rhône-Alpes BIOPARC/ADENINE
(4)
CONCORDE network, Réseau Oncologie Rhône-Alpes BIOPARC/ADENINE
(5)
ARC'ALPIN network, Unité de Concertation et de Recherche pour le Traitement des Affections Cancéreuses, CHU A. Michallon
(6)
Institut de Cancerologie de la Loire
(7)
Merck Serono
(8)
INSERM U590 Cytokine et Cancer

Advertisement